Yahoo: NFL formally opens investigation into Redskins tampering of Haynesworth

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I haven't heard much about the negotiations, so I assumed the status quo of "we're having an uncapped year" still happened.

I heard they were gonna start in June......

NFL | NFLPA will begin CBA talks with league soon
Wed, 20 May 2009 06:25:25 -0700

Len Pasquarelli, of ESPN.com, reports negotiations toward an extension of the collective bargaining agreement between the league and its players will begin on June 1, NFL executive vice president of labor/legal counsel Jeff Pash said Tuesday, May 19. How long the critical negotiations last, however, might depend on the league's desire to share its ledger books with the players, something it has so far has been reluctant to do. The NFLPA has stated that there will be no deal until the players are able to examine the league's books.

KFFL - NFL News and Notes

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

So you don't think the Redskins would tag Campbell if he lit it up next year?

No way. We would have to hold 15 mil in space for Campbell. Snyder likes to spend in FA so I dont see him holding 15 mil in cap space for Campbell (a player he wanted to trade twice this offseason). I dont even think he could if we wanted to though. No team would trade for Campbell with that price tag.

This is if its capped. If its uncapped their would be no need to Franchise Tag Campbell since we could match any offer.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Well I was criticizing you for mentioning Campbell leaving on a thread about Haynesworth, however, I'll be a hypocrite and continue to discuss Campbell in this thread.

- Since there's a 95% chance there will be an uncapped year in 2010, Jason Campbell will be a restricted free agent.

- If JC does well, the team will keep him by either renewing his contract or tagging him. So JC cannot just pick up and leave.

- If JC doesn't do well, he may be kept as a back up or released.

- The only way JC will leave this team after doing well, is if the FO really feels he's not their QB and trade him after placing the franchise tag on him, which I find unlikely.

Does the Franchise tag exist next year if it is uncapped? I still don't know all the details of the uncapped year.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Does the Franchise tag exist next year if it is uncapped? I still don't know all the details of the uncapped year.

Yes one franchise tag, and two transition tags per team

[Missin21]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I just accepted the idea that he more than likely wont be here after this season. either he tanks and is gone or he does well and leaves because you can tell he doesnt like/trust the FO after this past offseason. So im just lookin ahead for the best options that may be available at the time we may be in the market for a QB.

This should be your signature. That way, when a thread about how a mountain lion came down from the Rockies & damn near devoured Laron Landry's spare tire that was rolling freely around his campsite after a black bear attacked his car & tried to eat all his snickers bars before breakfast, you can simply state..."It's Campbell's fault! See signature". It'll definitely save all of us time.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Missin21

This should be your signature. That way, when a thread about how a mountain lion came down from the Rockies & *** near devoured Laron Landry's spare tire that was rolling freely around his campsite after a black bear attacked his car & tried to eat all his snickers bars before breakfast, you can simply state..."It's Campbell's fault! See signature". It'll definitely save all of us time.

Laron was attacked by a bear and a mountain lion, oh my!

[Missin21]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Laron was attacked by a bear and a mountain lion, oh my!

I left the tiger out for copywrite purposes.



Wait, didn't Campbell go to Auburn? Nevermind, I guess I didn't.

[DBUCHANON101]

Originally Posted by Missin21

This should be your signature. That way, when a thread about how a mountain lion came down from the Rockies & damn near devoured Laron Landry's spare tire that was rolling freely around his campsite after a black bear attacked his car & tried to eat all his snickers bars before breakfast, you can simply state..."It's Campbell's fault! See signature". It'll definitely save all of us time.

Dude chill out, Im sure im not the only one who feels JC hasnt lived up to his expectations.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Dude chill out, Im sure im not the only one who feels JC hasnt lived up to his expectations.

Fair point, it's just that you've made it a point to repeatedly point this out on your posts. Which confuses me because I thought you made an excellent point in one of your first posts on this site, stating that Campbell should be given a shot this year.

[DBUCHANON101]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Fair point, it's just that you've made it a point to repeatedly point this out on your posts. Which confuses me because I thought you made an excellent point in one of your first posts on this site, stating that Campbell should be given a shot this year.

He is getting his shot to prove everyone wrong -including myself-

[Missin21]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Dude chill out, Im sure im not the only one who feels JC hasnt lived up to his expectations.

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Fair point, it's just that you've made it a point to repeatedly point this out on your posts.

This pretty much answers it for me too. I can't look up without seeing you bash Campbell. Your tune IS starting to change a little since our argument last week, even tho you STILL haven't answered some of my questions (funny how that happens), but it still seems like you HAVE to dig the knife in on every thread as if everyone around you DOESN'T know how you feel. Give it a rest already. Despite your belief, there ARE other players on this team we can talk about that have little to nothing to do with the QB position.

[DBUCHANON101]

I just cut the part of the quote im referring to instead of posting an entire quote of someone else.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I just cut the part of the quote im referring to instead of posting an entire quote of someone else.

You do realize that makes your posts much less coherent. Plus, harder for everyone else to know who you are quoting. I know I like to use the backtrack(my term) button, and kind of read through the discussion to see the context of comments. I am pretty sure that I am not the only one.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I just cut the part of the quote im referring to instead of posting an entire quote of someone else.

That's fine but you're still not using it correctly.

The wrong way:

I just cut the part of the quote im referring to

The right way:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I just cut the part of the quote im referring to

The second way someone can actually a) see who made the original post and b) click on the arrow to the right of the username to go to the original post and read the entire quote

[MTK]

Highly doubtful anything comes of this.

Yet again, not much to see here.

[CRedskinsRule]

thanks