|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-01-2012, 05:09 PM | #46 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
|
Re: The "we should have takens"
I should have taken route 29 instead of I-95 this morning.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
Advertisements |
05-01-2012, 06:46 PM | #47 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: The "we should have takens"
Well played sir
__________________
24-34 |
05-01-2012, 08:24 PM | #48 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: The "we should have takens"
Quote:
First of all I think Tannehill is a much better QB then his perception. People view him as the default 3rd QB because of circumstance and not because of skillset. But, Tannehill's physical skillset rivals Luck and Griffin he simply lacks playing experience but he is entering into the best circumstances possible. The Dolphins scheme is almost identical to his scheme at Texas A&M from concepts to verbiage. I think Tannehill's rookie year production will rival Griffin and Luck...well if Miami had some WRs.(to that end the Fins should be all over Gaffney and Jacoby Jones) I think Weeden will play regardless of how McCoy plays. There will be too much egg on their face if they used a 1st round pick on a 28 year old QB that can't beat out the QB you want him to replace. |
|
|
|