Moss traded to Raiders

MTK · 02-24-2005, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drew54

Williamson most likely will be on the board, but is he a top ten pick? Same thing with Heath Miller. I think we should be able to trade out of this spot and maybe grab us a #2, at least a #3 and some late rounders.

I would much rather see us have a lot of draft picks than a few studs. Especially since we have so many guys coming and going, and the potentical cap purge in a few years.

The more young depth we can find the better.

If Williams and Edwards are both gone, I would definitely look to trade down and grab either Williamson or Clayton and pick up an additonal pick.

Redskins_P · 02-24-2005, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I said it in another thread, don't count on the Vikings taking a WR with that #7 pick, they still need plenty of defensive help and they seem pretty happy with the emergence of Burleson.

Even if Williams and Edwards are gone before #9, I can't see Williamson also being off the board.

I've heard that the Vikings will most likely pursue a FA WR, with some experience. I wouldn't be surprised if I saw Plaxico wearing purple next year.

drew54 · 02-24-2005, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

I've heard that the Vikings will most likely pursue a FA WR, with some experience. I wouldn't be surprised if I saw Plaxico wearing purple next year.

Damn Vikings are raining on our parade here.

Monksdown · 02-24-2005, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I said it in another thread, don't count on the Vikings taking a WR with that #7 pick, they still need plenty of defensive help and they seem pretty happy with the emergence of Burleson.

Even if Williams and Edwards are gone before #9, I can't see Williamson also being off the board.

I dont think the vikings will draft wideout help. I think they will visit the wire. Marty booker is their number 2. Come on...

They may have a difficult time signing anyone until they figure out who owns the team.

MTK · 02-24-2005, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I dont think the vikings will draft wideout help. I think they will visit the wire. Marty booker is their number 2. Come on...

They may have a difficult time signing anyone until they figure out who owns the team.

Their #2 is Marcus Robinson.

Daseal · 02-24-2005, 10:25 AM

wewhite - I also think we could have given MN a better deal for Moss. I think we could have kept our first round pick - or traded with them. As long as we gave them another pick.

Redskins_P · 02-24-2005, 01:51 PM

I wonder how much cap space the Vikings have. If they are way under, then I can see them picking up a FA WR.

Daseal · 02-24-2005, 03:58 PM

Isn't Marty Booker on the Dolphins? Chris Chambers, marty Booker, and David Boston - perhaps the best receiver corps in the NFL. I know everyone hates Boston - but when boston and booker are motivated they can be huge!

MTK · 02-24-2005, 04:13 PM

Boston hasn't done squat in years, Booker is decent, Chambers is the best of the three but he's not setting the world on fire. Best WR corps in the league?? What does that make the Colts then?

SmootSmack · 02-24-2005, 04:15 PM

"When Boston is motivated he can be huge"....motivated or injected I suppose

How could you leave out Derrius Thompson? He's the difference maker there!

Redskins_P · 02-24-2005, 04:42 PM

Booker hasn't done anything since his big year in Chicago. Boston is always injured and has off the field issues.

Bottom line is, both of those guys have had maybe one good year, and Chambers is probably a top 10 receiver. How does that make them the best WR corp?

St.Louis, Indianapolis, Raiders (since they got Moss now) have a much better receiving corp than the Dolphins.

02-24-2005, 10:25 AM	#6
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: Moss traded to Raiders wewhite - I also think we could have given MN a better deal for Moss. I think we could have kept our first round pick - or traded with them. As long as we gave them another pick.

02-24-2005, 03:58 PM	#8
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: Moss traded to Raiders Isn't Marty Booker on the Dolphins? Chris Chambers, marty Booker, and David Boston - perhaps the best receiver corps in the NFL. I know everyone hates Boston - but when boston and booker are motivated they can be huge!

02-24-2005, 04:15 PM	#10
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Moss traded to Raiders "When Boston is motivated he can be huge"....motivated or injected I suppose How could you leave out Derrius Thompson? He's the difference maker there! __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

02-24-2005, 04:42 PM	#11
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Aldie, VA Age: 47 Posts: 4,101	Re: Moss traded to Raiders Booker hasn't done anything since his big year in Chicago. Boston is always injured and has off the field issues. Bottom line is, both of those guys have had maybe one good year, and Chambers is probably a top 10 receiver. How does that make them the best WR corp? St.Louis, Indianapolis, Raiders (since they got Moss now) have a much better receiving corp than the Dolphins.

02-24-2005, 01:51 PM	#7
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Aldie, VA Age: 47 Posts: 4,101	Re: Moss traded to Raiders I wonder how much cap space the Vikings have. If they are way under, then I can see them picking up a FA WR.

02-24-2005, 04:13 PM	#9
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,038	Re: Moss traded to Raiders Boston hasn't done squat in years, Booker is decent, Chambers is the best of the three but he's not setting the world on fire. Best WR corps in the league?? What does that make the Colts then? __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Moss traded to Raiders

Locker Room Main Forum