12-06-2012, 04:55 PM | #46 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Replacing the KO
The more I think about it, the more I come up with reasons why this shouldn't be adopted.
Let's say I just scored and I just want to try to dominate the ball, so I decide to go for this 4th and 15. I call a pass play and illegal contact/pass interference is called on the play. I now get to keep the ball because of an automatic first down? How does that seem fair? The only way I can get on board with that occurring is if it goes both ways. Let's say I'm going for it and one of my linemen is called for holding, I think the ruling should be: other team's ball at my 20. That's really the only way I see it being fair and even then, with the way the NFL skews their officiating toward the offense, it's not really giving the defense a fair shake, in my opinion. If this is going to be a rule, you have to come up with a realistic way to deal with automatic first down penalties. |
Advertisements |
12-06-2012, 05:18 PM | #47 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Replacing the KO
You don't think the Refs would weigh that in any post flag conversation?
Flopping should be a 15 Yard unsportsmanlike, like the roughing the kicker BS we had recently. |
12-06-2012, 05:29 PM | #48 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Replacing the KO
id like to see hard data which shows that kickoffs result in significantly more serious injuries to players than any other play.
I also agree with Jdlea that if you remove the most dangerous play, then another play will become the most dangerous. Then another play. If you keep removing the most dangerous plays from the game, then you're left with 11 guys on the field hugging eachother. The kicking game is integral to the game of FOOTball. Leave it as is. Just come up with ways to make the game safer through technology and minor rule changes. The only significant change i'd support is eliminating overtime. by allowing games to go on longer than 4 quarters, you increase the number of plays in the game and the number of opportunities for players to get hurt. You elminate ridiculous and overly complex overtime rules. You make the actual 4 quarters of the game more meaningful. Sure, there would be ALOT more ties, but that would also change the strategy of the game. I think it would be interesting to see.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
12-06-2012, 05:55 PM | #49 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Quote:
how about making kickoffs a free kick at say the 50 and the receiving team has to have nine guys on the line ten yards downfield. no field goals allowed. |
|
12-06-2012, 06:47 PM | #50 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Pat Kirwan suggested on NFL Radio today that they should do a kickoff at the beginning of each half and overtime but place the ball at the 20 for all other post score scenarios. He didn't however address onside possibilities.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
12-06-2012, 08:00 PM | #51 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Bottom line is Mr. Commish needs to just leave the damn game alone.Enough with this nonsense. Since this clown has taken over the over pussification of the league has gone through the roof. Can't touch the qb's, can't hit the wr's, kick offs are pretty much done away with....a big reason why we watch it the violence. It's like Goodell is trying to make a hyena a house pet. Why the owners like him is beyond me.
|
12-06-2012, 08:02 PM | #52 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Replacing the KO
I'm not sure the hyenas could put up with Goodell. |
12-06-2012, 08:38 PM | #53 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: Replacing the KO
|
12-06-2012, 08:49 PM | #54 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 386
|
Re: Replacing the KO
They should not get rid of kick-offs. Most of the injuries they are trying to protect the players from are not happened on the kick-off. I like the idea someone posted earlier, if you kick it out of the end zone the ball gets placed on the 25 yard line. Like someone else mentioned if they get rid of it because it is the most dangerous play then they will keep doing it with other plays that are dangerous. Why don't they just use robots ...just kidding.
|
12-06-2012, 09:06 PM | #55 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Moving the kickoff up 5 yards has drastically cut down returns and injuries related to returns. At least let the change settle for a couple of years before another big change.
|
12-06-2012, 11:50 PM | #56 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,606
|
The idea in the article is absurd. Who in their rite mind would ever start a game going for it on 4th and 15 at their own 30? Would make punters ultra important though. I like the way it is now - more safe than before but still some returns. If you are going to do away with kickoffs than just do a coinflip, and the winning team can choose to play offense or defense. If you choose offense you start at the twenty. Its basically how most games / drives begin anyway.
|
12-07-2012, 12:37 AM | #57 | |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,606
|
Quote:
|
|
12-07-2012, 12:41 AM | #58 |
From a Land Down Under
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,606
|
|
12-07-2012, 01:09 AM | #59 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
|
Re: Replacing the KO
It amazes me that every week we see a QB or two or three throw to a WR over the middle and throws it slightly too high and a little late, exposing the WR to life changing injury.
- On 9/9/12 Devery Henderson was knocked unconscious in the game against us this year. - Two weeks later Oakland Raiders wide receiver Darrius Heyward-Bey still has no recollection of the devastating hit by Pittsburgh safety Ryan Mundy. - Jags WR Laurent Robinson has sustained three concussions this season -- one in the preseason, one in Week 3 vs. Cincinnati and one in Week 4 vs. Chicago. Sat out the month of October, but played the last two weeks after a Week 9 return vs. Detroit. - Giants WR D. Hixson sustained a concussion in week 2. - Giants WR Ramses Barden sustained a concusion in week 4. - Redskins Snatana Moss was concussed on Nov 4th. I am willing bet more WR's get more head injuries and other potential career threatening injuries then injuries on kickoffs. But do to ratings, since the mid 80's the NFL changed rules to promote more passing because that is what sells. Now we see Qb's throw twice as much as they used to. We are also seeing more these Wr head injuries. Where is the same concern? They want to eliminate the KO but they want more passing. Kind of funny how that works. Last edited by Defensewins; 12-07-2012 at 01:41 AM. |
12-07-2012, 01:55 AM | #60 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Replacing the KO
How bout we tweak Hines wards idea - no helmets, but only on kick offs
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|