Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2014, 12:01 PM   #46
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

I would like to see the o-line become:

LT: T. Williams
LG: Shawn Lauvao
C: Josh Leribeus
RG: Spencer Long
RT: Moses Morgan

The sooner we get this line up on the field, the better. Give them time to develop and play with each other in real action. Stop shelving young talent.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-22-2014, 01:17 PM   #47
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
I would like to see the o-line become:

LT: T. Williams
LG: Shawn Lauvao
C: Josh Leribeus
RG: Spencer Long
RT: Moses Morgan

The sooner we get this line up on the field, the better. Give them time to develop and play with each other in real action. Stop shelving young talent.
I would love a OL like that.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 01:26 PM   #48
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

^^ I would too. My biggest concerns with that line-up is that it makes a couple of big assumptions: (1) Moses lives up to his talent and doesn't go all "Winston Justice" on us; and (2) LeRib gets his lard butt motivated and plays to his alleged potential. I think that one of those two things is unlikely to occur. I don't know which it will be although my money is on LeRib never becoming a serviceable lineman.

Obviously, there are assumptions about Luavao and Long too - I just think they are more likely to pan out.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 01:30 PM   #49
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
I would like to see the o-line become:

LT: T. Williams
LG: Shawn Lauvao
C: Josh Leribeus
RG: Spencer Long
RT: Moses Morgan

The sooner we get this line up on the field, the better. Give them time to develop and play with each other in real action. Stop shelving young talent.
I dunno...a football kinda looks like a meatloaf, I doubt LeRibeus would let go of it.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 02:11 PM   #50
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,347
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
I dunno...a football kinda looks like a meatloaf, I doubt LeRibeus would let go of it.
What type of football-shaped meatballs have you been eating?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 03:28 PM   #51
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Draft picks tend to get better by playing in games. At some point during the season the young bucks need to take over.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 04:53 PM   #52
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,555
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

True, but having two rookies on the right side of the line to start the season seems awfully ambitious. Don't get me wrong -- if they outshine the incumbents, so be it. But it's not like either were considered 1st round OL studs and it may not be realistic to pencil them in as starters. I realize the strong desire to move on from the Chester-Polumbus matadors; I share it. But I think it will take some time -- perhaps a good part of the season to work toward that goal.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 05:45 PM   #53
sevier2
Impact Rookie
 
sevier2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 538
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
True, but having two rookies on the right side of the line to start the season seems awfully ambitious. Don't get me wrong -- if they outshine the incumbents, so be it. But it's not like either were considered 1st round OL studs and it may not be realistic to pencil them in as starters. I realize the strong desire to move on from the Chester-Polumbus matadors; I share it. But I think it will take some time -- perhaps a good part of the season to work toward that goal.
Thank You!

Why is everyone crying to get the rookies in ASAP? The line wasn't that bad last year and putting rookies on the same side of the line is very risky. People are forgetting about this "adjustment period" it takes for rookies to adapt to the NFL.
__________________
This is an environment of welcoming and you should just get the hell out of here.
sevier2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 06:03 PM   #54
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

i am not expecting playoffs this season, let the rookies get wet.
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 06:20 PM   #55
Gary84Clark
Registered User
 
Gary84Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
True, but having two rookies on the right side of the line to start the season seems awfully ambitious. Don't get me wrong -- if they outshine the incumbents, so be it. But it's not like either were considered 1st round OL studs and it may not be realistic to pencil them in as starters. I realize the strong desire to move on from the Chester-Polumbus matadors; I share it. But I think it will take some time -- perhaps a good part of the season to work toward that goal.

If the rookies can't beat out Chester and Polumbus then we in trouble.
Gary84Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 06:47 PM   #56
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Long is more ready than Moses because there is more to be learned at the Tackle position. But it's going to need to be gauged on a player by player development basis. Can't just throw a player in there if he's not ready whether it's the first game or it's the last. And you can't just throw a player in the game primarily for the sake of his development when he's not ready.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 09:50 PM   #57
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Projected Lineup... Your thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sevier2 View Post
Thank You!

Why is everyone crying to get the rookies in ASAP? The line wasn't that bad last year and putting rookies on the same side of the line is very risky. People are forgetting about this "adjustment period" it takes for rookies to adapt to the NFL.
what frikkin team were u watching last year? the only thing that worked was the zone blocking in the running game. Our pass protection was horrendous. If we pass protect again this year like we did last, I am frightened for RG3's career aspirations. Chester, Monty and Polumbus really sucked a golfball through a garden hose last year.

Their pass protection was absolute liquid shit.
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 10:23 PM   #58
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Projected 2014 starters: Washington Redskins - NFL.com



looks like a good lineup to me, I think our d will be much much better..

Our offensive line scares me. The whole thing except for Trent. There is nobody else on the team that makes me feel any better about it either. I think Moses will be an upgrade but he is a rookie. Im hoping Thomas can move into a starting role also at S. Our front seven on D and the skill positions on O are the tits though.
punch it in is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 10:31 PM   #59
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Trying to figure out why people think Moses wont start day 1

You and me both. Tyler freakin Polumbus is absolute trash. It is one thing to go with experience over youth and a complete other thing to go with it over trash.
punch it in is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2014, 10:40 PM   #60
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
i am not expecting playoffs this season, let the rookies get wet.

Who in the division has you so sure that we wont be winning it this year?
punch it in is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25274 seconds with 10 queries