Poll: Starting QB 2006

RedskinPete · 12-02-2005, 10:06 AM

I have to see Campbell play to pick him!!!

skinsfanthru&thru · 12-02-2005, 11:06 AM

I see it as Brunnel unless the team keeps up it's slide to finish the year and Gibbs decides to give the rook some work and then Campbell is able to keep that going through the offseason and preseason. Ramsey isn't even going to be on the team as Gibbs will get atleast something in return for him before he tells the organization to piss off.

by the way as far as #2 wr, anyone else wish we had gone after Joe Jurevicious(sp?) instead of Patten? I know hindsight is pointless but oh well.

onlydarksets · 12-02-2005, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfanthru&thru

I know hindsight is pointless but oh well.

Without hindsight, this board's traffic would decrease by 75%!

SallyJenkins · 12-02-2005, 11:19 AM

I don't think Heath Schuler ever got a fair shake.

Let's bring him back - I mean, what the hell!!?

onlydarksets · 12-02-2005, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyJenkins

I don't think Heath Schuler ever got a fair shake.

Let's bring him back - I mean, what the hell!!?

You'd like that - wouldn't you? More fodder for your "articles"...

saskin · 12-02-2005, 11:21 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't multiple teams after Mark Brunell? And we rushed to sign him before anyone else did?

FirstandTen · 12-02-2005, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins88

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't multiple teams after Mark Brunell? And we rushed to sign him before anyone else did?

Yea exactly if we didn't get brunell we probally be in the mist of the Kurt Warner Experence right now.

12thMan · 12-02-2005, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyJenkins

I don't think Heath Schuler ever got a fair shake.

Let's bring him back - I mean, what the hell!!?

Hey, Sal....please forgive me for being so rude. On the behalf of me and my colleagues, welcome to the board.

Your "hindsight" will be much appreciated.

NFLeurope · 12-02-2005, 12:16 PM

So you would say that if before he was signed you knew that in the first 2 seasons he was here Brunell would not lead the skins to the Playoffs...you still would have signed him to that contract he has (which many people have said is essentially a 3 year contract). I definately would not have...and would have preferred to see what i had already on the roster.

Now if all your saying is that he has played relatively well this year...and given the fact that at this point he is already on the roster...you would consider starting him next year...i dont have a problem with that...i mean i dont neccessarily agree...but i think thats legit...

However, i dont think that negates the fact that signing him in the first place was a mistake. He's here now so def. do with him whats best for the team. But having a guy not win for 2 of the 3 years many have said he is signed for...without knowing what he'll do in his 3rd year....is much closer to a failed signing than a success i would say.

onlydarksets · 12-02-2005, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLeurope

So you would say that if before he was signed you knew that in the first 2 seasons he was here Brunell would not lead the skins to the Playoffs...you still would have signed him to that contract he has (which many people have said is essentially a 3 year contract). I definately would not have...and would have preferred to see what i had already on the roster.

I hadn't thought of it in terms of your first hypothetical. However, I don't think a 2 year turnaround is realistic for this team. We showed a lot of promise at the beginning of the season, but we have also showed that we have a lot of work left to do. So, yes, I would probably still go through with the trade knowing what I know now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLeurope

Now if all your saying is that he has played relatively well this year...and given the fact that at this point he is already on the roster...you would consider starting him next year...i dont have a problem with that...i mean i dont neccessarily agree...but i think thats legit...

I definitely agree with your second hypothetical - he's our only option at this point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLeurope

However, i dont think that negates the fact that signing him in the first place was a mistake. He's here now so def. do with him whats best for the team. But having a guy not win for 2 of the 3 years many have said he is signed for...without knowing what he'll do in his 3rd year....is much closer to a failed signing than a success i would say.

You really can't look at MB for last year - he only played half the games. This year, I look more toward him. By next year, he needs to lead this team. I think he's already doing some leading now, but, by the start of next season, there is no doubt whose team this is.

EEich · 12-03-2005, 07:27 AM

I'd love to say Campbell, but without ever having seen him play...can't do it.

kingerock · 12-03-2005, 09:39 AM

If Brunell is healthy, play him. I'd love to see Ramsey get a shot at starting somewhere else. Arizona, St. Louis, Detroit and Baltimore all could use a starting QB and all have weapons. I like the kid.

I believe Gibbs will be here for the whole contract unless he's having health issues.

On a side note, I wonder if Marriuci or Martz would like to come on staff as an offensive coordinator.?

Redskins8588 · 12-03-2005, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingerock

If Brunell is healthy, play him. I'd love to see Ramsey get a shot at starting somewhere else. Arizona, St. Louis, Detroit and Baltimore all could use a starting QB and all have weapons. I like the kid.

I believe Gibbs will be here for the whole contract unless he's having health issues.

On a side note, I wonder if Marriuci or Martz would like to come on staff as an offensive coordinator.?

I would believe that Martz would be here in an offensive coordinator role before Marriuci, Martz offensve philosiophy is similar to Gibbs. I believe that they both worked in the "air coryell" offense.

skinsguy · 12-03-2005, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

I would believe that Martz would be here in an offensive coordinator role before Marriuci, Martz offensve philosiophy is similar to Gibbs. I believe that they both worked in the "air coryell" offense.

I dunno though. How long was Marriuci with the 49ers before he became head coach? I know it had to have been the time when the 49ers were still amongst the elite teams in the league.

View Poll Results: Starting QB: Opening Day 2006
Brunell	64	57.66%
Ramsey	5	4.50%
Campbell	39	35.14%
Other (who)	3	2.70%
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

12-02-2005, 10:06 AM	#1
RedskinPete The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Camino,Ca Posts: 1,174	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 I have to see Campbell play to pick him!!!

12-02-2005, 11:19 AM	#4
SallyJenkins Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 20	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 I don't think Heath Schuler ever got a fair shake. Let's bring him back - I mean, what the hell!!?

12-02-2005, 11:21 AM	#6
saskin Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: San Antonio Age: 38 Posts: 355	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't multiple teams after Mark Brunell? And we rushed to sign him before anyone else did?

12-02-2005, 12:16 PM	#9
NFLeurope Camp Scrub Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 85	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 So you would say that if before he was signed you knew that in the first 2 seasons he was here Brunell would not lead the skins to the Playoffs...you still would have signed him to that contract he has (which many people have said is essentially a 3 year contract). I definately would not have...and would have preferred to see what i had already on the roster. Now if all your saying is that he has played relatively well this year...and given the fact that at this point he is already on the roster...you would consider starting him next year...i dont have a problem with that...i mean i dont neccessarily agree...but i think thats legit... However, i dont think that negates the fact that signing him in the first place was a mistake. He's here now so def. do with him whats best for the team. But having a guy not win for 2 of the 3 years many have said he is signed for...without knowing what he'll do in his 3rd year....is much closer to a failed signing than a success i would say.

12-02-2005, 11:06 AM	#2
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 46 Posts: 3,815	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 I see it as Brunnel unless the team keeps up it's slide to finish the year and Gibbs decides to give the rook some work and then Campbell is able to keep that going through the offseason and preseason. Ramsey isn't even going to be on the team as Gibbs will get atleast something in return for him before he tells the organization to piss off. by the way as far as #2 wr, anyone else wish we had gone after Joe Jurevicious(sp?) instead of Patten? I know hindsight is pointless but oh well.

12-03-2005, 07:27 AM	#11
EEich The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Bristol, CT Age: 62 Posts: 1,001	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 I'd love to say Campbell, but without ever having seen him play...can't do it.

12-03-2005, 09:39 AM	#12
kingerock Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Killeen, TX Age: 50 Posts: 360	Re: Poll: Starting QB 2006 If Brunell is healthy, play him. I'd love to see Ramsey get a shot at starting somewhere else. Arizona, St. Louis, Detroit and Baltimore all could use a starting QB and all have weapons. I like the kid. I believe Gibbs will be here for the whole contract unless he's having health issues. On a side note, I wonder if Marriuci or Martz would like to come on staff as an offensive coordinator.? __________________ Redskins fan lost in Texas for 20 years. Need a ride to D.C.

Poll: Starting QB 2006

Locker Room Main Forum