Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What's Considered Success for Next Season?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2006, 01:01 PM   #61
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: What's Considered Success for Next Season?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Ok, well about Portis then? Or Springs? And you know we'll go out and get one or two difference makers. And a full season of Campbell?

I won't even touch the coaching argument.
Portis will help. But can we honestly count on Springs at this point of his career? No. I just think winning the division is a bit of a stretch. Too many holes on defense. I would take 9-7 or 8-8 and a Wild Card. To me that would be a successful season. But our coaches need to coach better. Gibbs needs to be more aggressive. I was shocked when he went for it on 4-4. Where has that been all year long? Sometimes you gotta coach to win instead of coaching not to lose.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-31-2006, 01:13 PM   #62
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: What's Considered Success for Next Season?

It will all depend on the D. If we can get back to 2004/2005 form defensively the sky's the limit.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.50479 seconds with 10 queries