Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Rexi

Well who the **** can cover Anquan Boldin or Larry Fitzgerald genius? Harris had one of the best seasons I've seen a corner have in a while.

And you are an idiot if you think Clements is actually going to get 80 million. Try 1/4 of that, if the math isn't too difficult for you.

Did I touch a nerve, Lexi? Well if no one can cover them, why did you just pay a corner 81 million?

Btw, he is getting 22 million in guaranteed money. Let's see in second grade, I learned that 4 x 22 equals 88. Any more questions, you mental midget?

I guess his base salaries are going to be negative. You should take your comedy act on the road but don't travel on any highways with double digits, you may get lost.

[Questfor31]

The 9ers way overpaid for Nate Clements. Nate's skills were beginnning to diminish during his last two years in Buffalo. He was not the shut down, ball hawk of a corner that he was the three years prior. Nate's a good corner, but he's no Champ Bailey. 8 years, $80 mil for an overrated player is a bit excessive.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Questfor31

The 9ers way overpaid for Nate Clements. Nate's skills were beginnning to diminish during his last two years in Buffalo. He was not the shut down, ball hawk of a corner that he was the three years prior. Nate's a good corner, but he's no Champ Bailey. 8 years, $80 mil for an overrated player is a bit excessive.

Don't tell Lexi that, he may throw his bizarro world math on you...

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

Did I touch a nerve, Lexi? Well if no one can cover them, why did you just pay a corner 81 million?

Maybe because he will do a better job at covering them then nearly anyone else in the NFL would? It's called an upgrade. Are you saying that because some WR's are nearly uncoverable there is no point in signing good corners???

Btw, he is getting 22 million in guaranteed money. Let's see in second grade, I learned that 4 x 22 equals 88. Any more questions, you mental midget?

Then why the hell did you say he isn't worth 80 million? You acted like we just handed him the check.

I guess his base salaries are going to be negative. You should take your comedy act on the road but don't travel on any highways with double digits, you may get lost.

... okay?

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by Questfor31

The 9ers way overpaid for Nate Clements. Nate's skills were beginnning to diminish during his last two years in Buffalo. He was not the shut down, ball hawk of a corner that he was the three years prior. Nate's a good corner, but he's no Champ Bailey. 8 years, $80 mil for an overrated player is a bit excessive.

Well shut down corners don't really exist. Even Bailey isn't a shut down corner, though he finally lived up to his reputation somewhat this season. What I like about him is how aggressive he is.

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

I like Nate Clements, but he's not the best defensive player in the league even though he's getting paid like he is.

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

Don't tell Lexi that, he may throw his bizarro world math on you...

Bizarro world math? Do you disagree that 22 is roughly 1/4 of 80? If that's bizarro world math to you then estimation must be tough.

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

I like Nate Clements, but he's not the best defensive player in the league even though he's getting paid like he is.

I agree, that would go to Shawn Merriman. But nearly everyone is over-paid as a FA. It's the nature of the market.

[Pocket$ $traight]

quote=Rexi;283186]Bizarro world math? Do you disagree that 22 is roughly 1/4 of 80? If that's bizarro world math to you then estimation must be tough.[/quote]


What about the base salaries, Stephen Hawking? Did you forget about those? When you learn simple arithmetic we can talk contracts.

[Rexi]

And BTW, is changing the first letter of my screen name from an 'R' to an 'L' when addresssing me supposed to be a clever insult? Am I missing something or are you just that lame?

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

I like Nate Clements, but he's not the best defensive player in the league even though he's getting paid like he is.

I bet Frank Gore would be better at corner. Since he is better than Emmit and Tomlinson, he has nothing to prove as a runningback.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Rexi

And BTW, is changing the first letter of my screen name from an 'R' to an 'L' when addresssing me supposed to be a clever insult? Am I missing something or are you just that lame?

Just explain to me how Clements is only going to earn roughly 1/4th of his 81 million dollar contract when he will recieve 22 million without stepping on the field.

I have my laughtrack ready.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Rexi

Maybe because he will do a better job at covering them then nearly anyone else in the NFL would? It's called an upgrade. Are you saying that because some WR's are nearly uncoverable there is no point in signing good corners???
Then why the hell did you say he isn't worth 80 million? You acted like we just handed him the check.
... okay?

Champ could cover them. But since he didn't sign with the 9ers, I guess he isn't in the same league as Clements.

If no one can cover them, I would say the money would be better spent on someone like Thomas or a defensive lineman. If you can't cover the receiver you should pressure the QB.

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

quote=Rexi;283186]Bizarro world math? Do you disagree that 22 is roughly 1/4 of 80? If that's bizarro world math to you then estimation must be tough.

What about the base salaries, Stephen Hawking? Did you forget about those? When you learn simple arithmetic we can talk contracts.[/quote]Do you think 80 million is his base salary or something?

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Rexi

What about the base salaries, Stephen Hawking? Did you forget about those? When you learn simple arithmetic we can talk contracts.

Do you think 80 million is his base salary or something?[/quote]

Read your posts and then we can talk about this. You have no idea what you typed, do you...