Russell to the skins?

JWsleep · 03-15-2007, 01:29 PM

Here's a thought--Vinny is simply a decoy this year. Gibbs has figured out that he can't pick em, and sends him places where he can do least harm.

It's all the places where Vinny ISN'T that should be of interest.

Riggo44 · 03-15-2007, 01:33 PM

This will never ever happen. It's funny that someone would even wright such a stupid. article.

:yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright

:yeahright

:yeahright

:smashfrea

celts32 · 03-15-2007, 01:33 PM

This may be the most rediculous Redskins rumor of all time.

Riggo44 · 03-15-2007, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

This may be the most rediculous Redskins rumor of all time.

I agree. It's a total waste of time!

JWsleep · 03-15-2007, 01:40 PM

5 pages an counting???? Where are the hijackers when you need them!!!

Hog1 · 03-15-2007, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWsleep

Here's a thought--Vinny is simply a decoy this year. Gibbs has figured out that he can't pick em, and sends him places where he can do least harm.

It's all the places where Vinny ISN'T that should be of interest.

SHHHHHHH, be vawy, vawy, quiet. Whea' hunting Vinnie's.....Cwazy Vinnie

Just remember, if you see a Vinnie, you gotta' lead him! They can move!

724Skinsfan · 03-15-2007, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWsleep

5 pages an counting???? Where are the hijackers when you need them!!!

What's that? A distress call! AMD! TMC! SmootSmack! Rally to me! A worthless thread is in dire need of hijacking.

Did anybody watch the last episode of 24? Jericho? Two of the best episodes for both series this past week.

That Guy · 03-15-2007, 02:16 PM

i don't like either, but i loved last night's south park... it was almost as disturbing as cartman feeding that kids parent's to him in the chili.

freddyg12 · 03-15-2007, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWsleep

Here's a thought--Vinny is simply a decoy this year. Gibbs has figured out that he can't pick em, and sends him places where he can do least harm.

It's all the places where Vinny ISN'T that should be of interest.

but since the Danny just lost that suit to his former housekeeper, Vinny may be logging more hours on the domestic clock than at Redskin Park.

724Skinsfan · 03-15-2007, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

i don't like either, but i loved last night's south park... it was almost as disturbing as cartman feeding that kids parent's to him in the chili.

Since my wife started recording mickey mouse clubhouse and little einsteins for THE BOY(!!!), I have not been able to record the south park episodes due to available disk space on the DVR....{sigh}...

freddyg12 · 03-15-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

i don't like either, but i loved last night's south park... it was almost as disturbing as cartman feeding that kids parent's to him in the chili.

I don't know, that chiil (Scott Tenorman was it?) episode was pretty raw, actually made it hard to laugh at.

Longtimefan · 03-15-2007, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

It makes 100% no sense.

Some of these speculative ideas are so far-fetched and out of the realm of possibility, they don't even warrant a response, and this is one of them. Sometimes people just get lost for something to talk about.

MonkFan4Life · 03-15-2007, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

i don't like either, but i loved last night's south park... it was almost as disturbing as cartman feeding that kids parent's to him in the chili.

I watched it this morning ! Had me in tears !

EternalEnigma21 · 03-15-2007, 02:41 PM

If Russel was available at #6 (and he won't be) and we didn't take him I'd be pissed. With the Raiders showing that they may not be as interested in him as once thought, different scenarios may play out that allow him to fall, so the FO has to be prepared for that, and if he's available why would we not take him?

Again, the Brees/Rivers thing was a good problem to have. Having Brunell as a backup doesn't give us much options in the coming years and Joe Gibbs himself says the #1 most important position on the team is the starting QB, and the #2 is the Backup QB...

I also think, if we hadn't already spent all of our picks, and were in a position to make a move we should.... but thats completely hypothetical and doesn't matter because we are not in a position to do so and would give up entirely too much if it were calling for movement up to #1 to take him...

But... what if he falls to #4, and we could give up Adam Archuletta, Sean Springs, and our #6 pick to move up to take him... and somehow get dre bly in the process... would we do it?

celts32 · 03-15-2007, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canthetuna

If Russel was available at #6 (and he won't be) and we didn't take him I'd be pissed. With the Raiders showing that they may not be as interested in him as once thought, different scenarios may play out that allow him to fall, so the FO has to be prepared for that, and if he's available why would we not take him?

Again, the Brees/Rivers thing was a good problem to have. Having Brunell as a backup doesn't give us much options in the coming years and Joe Gibbs himself says the #1 most important position on the team is the starting QB, and the #2 is the Backup QB...

I also think, if we hadn't already spent all of our picks, and were in a position to make a move we should.... but thats completely hypothetical and doesn't matter because we are not in a position to do so and would give up entirely too much if it were calling for movement up to #1 to take him...

But... what if he falls to #4, and we could give up Adam Archuletta, Sean Springs, and our #6 pick to move up to take him... and somehow get dre bly in the process... would we do it?

I don't even think they should pick him at #6(Unless it's to trade him)...they already drafted a #1 QB and paid a steep price to move in to position to take him. JC has shown nothing to warrent giving up on him so soon.

And as far as Russell goes...throwing the ball 100 yards with the flick of a wrist does not make him a great NFL QB...he is far from a sure thing. Two words...Jeff George

03-15-2007, 01:29 PM	#61
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 55 Posts: 4,717	Re: Russell to the skins? Here's a thought--Vinny is simply a decoy this year. Gibbs has figured out that he can't pick em, and sends him places where he can do least harm. It's all the places where Vinny ISN'T that should be of interest. __________________ Hail from Houston!

03-15-2007, 01:33 PM	#62
Riggo44 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Clemente CA Age: 51 Posts: 2,390	Re: Russell to the skins? This will never ever happen. It's funny that someone would even wright such a stupid. article. :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :yeahright :smashfrea __________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin

03-15-2007, 01:33 PM	#63
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 53 Posts: 2,665	Re: Russell to the skins? This may be the most rediculous Redskins rumor of all time. __________________ Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub

03-15-2007, 01:40 PM	#65
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 55 Posts: 4,717	Re: Russell to the skins? 5 pages an counting???? Where are the hijackers when you need them!!! __________________ Hail from Houston!

03-15-2007, 02:16 PM	#68
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Russell to the skins? i don't like either, but i loved last night's south park... it was almost as disturbing as cartman feeding that kids parent's to him in the chili.

03-15-2007, 02:41 PM	#74
EternalEnigma21 Assistant Regional Mod Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Carbondale CO Age: 44 Posts: 2,958	Re: Russell to the skins? If Russel was available at #6 (and he won't be) and we didn't take him I'd be pissed. With the Raiders showing that they may not be as interested in him as once thought, different scenarios may play out that allow him to fall, so the FO has to be prepared for that, and if he's available why would we not take him? Again, the Brees/Rivers thing was a good problem to have. Having Brunell as a backup doesn't give us much options in the coming years and Joe Gibbs himself says the #1 most important position on the team is the starting QB, and the #2 is the Backup QB... I also think, if we hadn't already spent all of our picks, and were in a position to make a move we should.... but thats completely hypothetical and doesn't matter because we are not in a position to do so and would give up entirely too much if it were calling for movement up to #1 to take him... But... what if he falls to #4, and we could give up Adam Archuletta, Sean Springs, and our #6 pick to move up to take him... and somehow get dre bly in the process... would we do it? __________________ I am the brute squad.

Russell to the skins?

Locker Room Main Forum