Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Update: Saunders Signs Deal with Rams to be OC

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 12:29 PM   #61
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
I agree. I am sure the Rams will let him do what he is being brought there to do. There wont be a 2 year learning curve, the Rams will be humming by week 3 or 4.
Oh really? They have a QB who's best days are far behind him with a terrible offensive line and aging wideouts, tight end?? The worst decision of Gibbs career was to listen to all the experts after our Playoff loss to Seattle. He stopped calling plays for the first time and went out to get Saunders. Gibbs was not the problem in 05' it was Brunnel and no real talent passing besides Moss that year. Gibbs started 6-10 (gets a pass in my book 1st year back) then he won 11 games!! I don't see why he changes the entire system at that point.

Al is a good coach but an entire offensive change was not a good call. Then when he's in Gibbs doesn't like what he is seeing and all of a sudden pulls control from him. Al wan't to blame there. Our offense did show flashes of greatness but also the play calling of Saunders could be questioned in my opinion at times. A reverse to Moss in GB with the lead? Awful call. Gmen game on the goal-line, awful. His redzone plays sucked both years!
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-31-2008, 01:00 PM   #62
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Not quite sure how Marc Bulger has his best days far behind him? If anything, he's starting to blossom. He's 30, a 2 time Pro Bowler, and very capable of leading the Rams to the playoffs...if he can stay healthy. An offensive line (which the Rams are notorious for lacking) will help with that. And while Holt (31) and Bruce (36) are aging, they are still very capable receivers. Plus they have Randy McMichael, a very good pass-catching TE. And with the development of Brian Leonard, have 2 solid running backs. Al Saunders will have a field day with these guys...
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:09 PM   #63
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by BDBohnzie View Post
Not quite sure how Marc Bulger has his best days far behind him? If anything, he's starting to blossom. He's 30, a 2 time Pro Bowler, and very capable of leading the Rams to the playoffs...if he can stay healthy. An offensive line (which the Rams are notorious for lacking) will help with that. And while Holt (31) and Bruce (36) are aging, they are still very capable receivers. Plus they have Randy McMichael, a very good pass-catching TE. And with the development of Brian Leonard, have 2 solid running backs. Al Saunders will have a field day with these guys...

Bulger has looked pretty average past few years. No line means no running game. Look at the fantasy bust of the year Jackson. A stud with nowhere to run. Randy McMichael is out of shape and just a name on a jersey now. He got into substance abuse in Miami and looked bad last year, maybe he turns it around? Rutgers Brian Leonard? Ok that's not really a bigtime player.

Al Saunders is like anyone who gets FIRED, need to keep the paychecks coming in while he's still able to coach and not lay down all day like most senior citizens.
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:15 PM   #64
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

If he stays healthy, Steven Jackson will rush for 2000 yards and have 800 receiving. The Rams biggest problem last year was injuries (even more than us). And don't be suprised to see them take Jake Long to shore up the line with Pace having trouble staying healthy.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:17 PM   #65
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
Yeah! Rams & Redskins both learning a new offense in the same year, should be interesting to see how much farther along the Rams will be with that 700 page playbook than we were in his first year here.
Greg Blache probably knows it better than the Rams will when they come to FedEx.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:20 PM   #66
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by rypper11 View Post
If he stays healthy, Steven Jackson will rush for 2000 yards and have 800 receiving. The Rams biggest problem last year was injuries (even more than us). And don't be suprised to see them take Jake Long to shore up the line with Pace having trouble staying healthy.
Doubt you will see Jackson 2000 / 800.

LT maybe!
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:36 PM   #67
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Gus:

Skins
Lions
Broncos
Bengals
Vikings
Dolphins
Rams
2008 = ?

He should come back. He's used to moving. Collins will be useless without Saunders and he SHOULD follow him to St. Louie.

So we'll be down to Campbell and Brunell in his final year. We need another QB.

I'm fine with bringing Gus back. I liked him while he was here, until he headbutted the wall and hurt his neck. He still occasionally has flashes of talent...all we need for a backup anyways.

Maybe we'll draft another QB in the later rounds.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:38 PM   #68
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Gus:

Skins
Lions
Broncos
Bengals
Vikings
Dolphins
Rams
2008 = ?

He should come back. He's used to moving. Collins will be useless without Saunders and he SHOULD follow him to St. Louie.

So we'll be down to Campbell and Brunell in his final year. We need another QB.

I'm fine with bringing Gus back. I liked him while he was here, until he headbutted the wall and hurt his neck. He still occasionally has flashes of talent...all we need for a backup anyways.

Maybe we'll draft another QB in the later rounds.

I think we should sign Collins. That would be best for our 08' QB situation. How many years has Collins followed Saunders and he did bring him to Washington but who gave him real playing time? WASHINGTON!
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:39 PM   #69
ksmitty7723
Camp Scrub
 
ksmitty7723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

I totally agree with using a draft pick this year on a QB. Maybe Flacco will drop to the 3rd and the skins can get him. I have said it before, I would not be surprised to see another QB really push or take JC's job away. We have to clear Brunell's money off of us!
ksmitty7723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:40 PM   #70
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksmitty7723 View Post
I totally agree with using a draft pick this year on a QB. Maybe Flacco will drop to the 3rd and the skins can get him. I have said it before, I would not be surprised to see another QB really push or take JC's job away. We have to clear Brunell's money off of us!
Snyder hires Zorn with JC in mind! He's not losing his job to anyone.

Why waste pick on QB in 3rd round? We could use that one Defensive lineman, CB, or WR.

Sign Collins if possible.
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:43 PM   #71
ksmitty7723
Camp Scrub
 
ksmitty7723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Signing Collins will be a waste without Saunders. What has Jason done after a full year of starting to say he is irreplaceable? Late picks against TB and Dallas? Don't get me wrong, I like him and root for JC, but let's don't get ahead of ourselves. And another thing, do you really think Zorn took the job by looking at the QB situation?
ksmitty7723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:45 PM   #72
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by QBall View Post
Bulger has looked pretty average past few years. No line means no running game. Look at the fantasy bust of the year Jackson. A stud with nowhere to run. Randy McMichael is out of shape and just a name on a jersey now. He got into substance abuse in Miami and looked bad last year, maybe he turns it around? Rutgers Brian Leonard? Ok that's not really a bigtime player.
Jackson ran for 1000 last year behind a line more riddled with injuries than the Skins line. And did it in 12 games. On top of that, he had another 38 catches. A 2000/800 season isn't that unrealistic if the Rams can sure up their O-Line. McMichael was 3rd on the Rams last year in catches and receiving yards. And while Leonard isn't a big time player, he's a solid backup.

As far as Bulger being average, in 2006, he passed for over 4300 yards (3rd in NFL), 24 TDs (T-4th)/8 INTs (Lowest among starters). Those aren't average numbers...
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 02:00 PM   #73
QBall
Special Teams
 
QBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by BDBohnzie View Post
Jackson ran for 1000 last year behind a line more riddled with injuries than the Skins line. And did it in 12 games. On top of that, he had another 38 catches. A 2000/800 season isn't that unrealistic if the Rams can sure up their O-Line. McMichael was 3rd on the Rams last year in catches and receiving yards. And while Leonard isn't a big time player, he's a solid backup.

As far as Bulger being average, in 2006, he passed for over 4300 yards (3rd in NFL), 24 TDs (T-4th)/8 INTs (Lowest among starters). Those aren't average numbers...
Stats are not the only barometer.

03' Rams 12-4 Bulger 22td-22int
04' Rams 8-8 Bulger 21td-14int
05' Rams 6-10 Bulger 14td-9int
06' Rams 8-8 Bulger 24td-8int
07' Rams 3-13 Bulger 11td-15int

So you're telling me he made playoffs in 03' and has shit the bed since and he's ready to explode with Saunders? Ok buddy. Jackon no doubt is a star but wins are more important.
__________________
IT WAS THE TIME OF THE PREACHER.............IN THE YEAR OF 01'. NOW THAT THE LESSON IS OVER, THE KILLINGS BEGUN.......
QBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 02:31 PM   #74
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by QBall View Post
Stats are not the only barometer.

03' Rams 12-4 Bulger 22td-22int
04' Rams 8-8 Bulger 21td-14int
05' Rams 6-10 Bulger 14td-9int
06' Rams 8-8 Bulger 24td-8int
07' Rams 3-13 Bulger 11td-15int

So you're telling me he made playoffs in 03' and has shit the bed since and he's ready to explode with Saunders? Ok buddy. Jackon no doubt is a star but wins are more important.
Bulger's starts those seasons: '03 - 15, '04 - 14, '05 - 8, '06 - 16, '07 - 12

While I agree wins are important, one must remember that the Rams defense shit the bed as well.
'03 - 16th
'04 - 17th
'05 - 30th
'06 - 23rd
'07 - 21st

Can't pin team records on just the QB...I think offensively under Saunders, the Rams will do well. It's the defense that is going to be the key factor.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 02:32 PM   #75
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Saunders Close to Deal with Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by QBall View Post
Bulger has looked pretty average past few years. No line means no running game. Look at the fantasy bust of the year Jackson. A stud with nowhere to run. Randy McMichael is out of shape and just a name on a jersey now. He got into substance abuse in Miami and looked bad last year, maybe he turns it around? Rutgers Brian Leonard? Ok that's not really a bigtime player.

Al Saunders is like anyone who gets FIRED, need to keep the paychecks coming in while he's still able to coach and not lay down all day like most senior citizens.
IMO, Saunders was limited by a QB that is just too slow with the ball. When Collins came in and the ball finally started coming out fast we got a taste of what the O could have been.

Today's NFL is a passing game but Gibbs never could come to terms with that (I think because he had no faith in his QB or WRs to do it).
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.83310 seconds with 10 queries