Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2009, 08:01 PM   #1
RedskinMike
Special Teams
 
RedskinMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 416
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Betts has been around a while and has never broken through. He filled in for clinton and played his ass off in a contract year. He should've been traded after that and we could have got good value for him. Not now though.
RedskinMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 08:28 PM   #2
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,030
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

He would be expendable if the Skins drafted properly...but they didn't...so...we need him
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 09:05 PM   #3
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
He would be expendable if the Skins drafted properly...but they didn't...so...we need him
Who didn't we draft and where that you would have replaced him with? I'm not a big Betts fan, but just curious.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 10:23 PM   #4
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
He would be expendable if the Skins drafted properly...but they didn't...so...we need him
So if the Skins had drafted a RB in the 3rd round, you would be sending Betts packing? Otherwise you're telling me that you would have been willing to take Knowshon or Wells at #13. How would you have drafted "properly" that right now at this instant you'd be willing to get rid of Ladell Betts.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 10:21 AM   #5
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

The NFL is clearly moving away from the 1 back system. While portis is great, he can't withstand the punishment of an entire NFL season as 25+ carry per game back and still function at the level he's accustomed. Not only do we need a capable backup, we need an explosive robin to Portis' batman. I guess what I'm saying is not only is Betts not expendable, we should be looking for an explosive upgrade.
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper.
- Churchill
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 10:29 AM   #6
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunellMVP? View Post
The NFL is clearly moving away from the 1 back system. While portis is great, he can't withstand the punishment of an entire NFL season as 25+ carry per game back and still function at the level he's accustomed. Not only do we need a capable backup, we need an explosive robin to Portis' batman. I guess what I'm saying is not only is Betts not expendable, we should be looking for an explosive upgrade.
Well put. I agree.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 10:52 AM   #7
Son Of Man
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Ladell is only expendable...once we acquire a suitable replacement.
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 03:03 PM   #8
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

We all know Portis is the man. Unless he gets hurt.

Betts is a great second stringer. Yes, he filled in admirably while Portis was hurt which is why I would keep him and he has the ability to be utilized as a KR/PR. Unless we find someone else who is as good or better he's on the team.

I totally agree with those of you who keep saying Rock is a leader. No question. I totally agree with those who say Rock is one of the best special teamers. No question. The only issue I have is the fact he is not that great of a RB. The question I pose is if we could find someone else who can do KR and PR as good or better then Rock can we let him go? There is no questoin he's not a great leader, but we have leaders all over the field including special teams. If anyone was expendable in the RB position I would think it would be Rock only cause he is 3rd string, and only performs one job admirably and that being a KR. He does not even do the PR duties.

If the team wanted a slasher/scat back then I would hope it is one of the two Aldridge or Dorsey to take over the 3rd stringer position. Then the team can play Portis, when he gets tired put Betts in, and if they need a change of pace put Aldridge or Dorsey in whoever wins the spot.

Somewhere in there I would like to find a young RB for the future to groom to replace Portis and Betts. Now "IF" Mason should happen to step up and play better then Betts then keep Mason. I doubt that will happen as much of a Mason fan as I am. If they could find another RB who is younger to start to groom then fine. I remember recently the majority of you guys wanted the team to get younger. Now no one is expendable.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 08:59 PM   #9
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Is there ever a good time to fumble?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 09:26 PM   #10
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Is there ever a good time to fumble?
On the one yard line, the football can roll under the defenders feet and your teammate picks that sucker up for a touchdown. Ahhhh-haaaa!
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2009, 12:02 AM   #11
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Is there ever a good time to fumble?
I'm sure that Betts tells himself, "Now is a good time to fumble. No one will mind..."
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2009, 11:59 PM   #12
DoggDayAfternoon
Camp Scrub
 
DoggDayAfternoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 51
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?

Anybody is replaceable..and the rb market is a thick one.
DoggDayAfternoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25599 seconds with 10 queries