|
10-11-2004, 07:07 PM
|
#61 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,501
|
Actually, if you ask the reporters who've watched both Ramsey and Brunell in practice (myself included) there's no comparison in arm strength. Brunell's passes simply don't get to the receivers as quickly as Ramsey's, and his deep passes are generally late and underthrown. Deep passes have got to lead the receiver, and drop in over the coverage. Brunell doesn't have the arm to do that anymore. At least, not as much as Ramsey does.
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
10-11-2004, 07:08 PM
|
#62 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
|
guess thats it huh?
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 07:11 PM
|
#63 | |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Quote:
I'm so depressed. The fact that he said he wouldnt even consider it really irks me. I understand that its not just Mark Brunell, and hes getting piled on more than he desereves, but the exact things that are the problem, are things Ramsey is good at. I am almost to the point where I hope Brunell has to leave a game with a minor injury ( I never wish major injury on anyone ), and Ramsey just has a feild day. I'm taking a nap..... Same sh*t, different year
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 07:17 PM
|
#64 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
Brunell's arm strength doesn't even remotely compare to Ramsey's. Heck, even Hamdan had more arm strength. Shoot, I think I've seen Rod Gardner gun it better than Brunell when he's thrown the ball
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 07:18 PM
|
#65 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
|
we better finish with a better record than last year... even spurrier came in yr 1 and went 8-8... why? he had a defense that kept that poor offense in games... gibbs has the same now so what's the deal? 107 yards!!??!!??
ZZZzzz |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 07:20 PM
|
#66 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
If it was Ramsey throwing the ball to Coles on that fly rout lastnight where deion got his int, IMO it would have be a touchdown. Anyone watching the game could clearly see that the ball was underthrown by a mile and Coles had a step on the "2" defenders. But that is just my opinion.
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 07:23 PM
|
#67 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Larry Hill.. Check! Who's ready for the angry mob treatment!
God, another week of Brunell. Holloween's coming up, maybe Brunell could dress up as a quarterback! |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 08:08 PM
|
#68 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
VTskin, spurrier went 7-9 that year... right now gibbs isnt getting it done though and from what i heard, is refusing to change
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 08:55 PM
|
#69 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 157
|
i liked the dood doing the mike check/comedy hour... he gave props to someone there for being able to get really good weed. very random!
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 08:58 PM
|
#70 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
What about me gman? I've been ripping Brunell for weeks
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 09:01 PM
|
#71 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 09:05 PM
|
#72 | |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Quote:
If you put say Priet Holmes in Portis's spot, hes going ot do just as bad becasue there are no holes. Does anyone think having a Holmes or Tomlinson back there would make a difference? If we had say Issac Bruce and Torry Holt as wideouts instead of Coles and Gardner, does anyone really think there would be a difference. Maybe a catch or two, but in the long run theres no difference. If we had a whole new offensive line, does anyone think it would make a difference in whats going on right now? The only postion that would matter is right tackle, but if we replaced the whole offensive line, we wouldnt be that much better. Now riddle me this... If we put Peyton Manning in at Quarterback in our system. Is it just me, or do people think we would move the ball a hell of alot more effectivley than we are now? I think we do. I think changing that one postion, changes the entire game for our offense. Now dont misquote me, Ramsey is NO Petyon Manning, but hes young, and has a cannon and can air it out so teams respect our run. When Gibbs ( I'm really trying to stay far away from bashing him or what he thinks, because I belive in him 100% outside of the qb issue ), but when Gibbs is trying to defend Brunells ability to air out the ball, on a pass in which he underthrew his target and was picked off... thats telling me somthing. I dont know, everyone has their own takes. If we lose to Chicago, and Brunell plays like sh*t and stays our QB, so help me god.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 09:47 PM
|
#73 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
i agree... qb is the weakest link for total offense, and a good passing game would cover up the run blocking on the O line... if we had a moss or TO i think it would make a difference... but thats 2 WRs out of hundreds in the league...
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 11:15 PM
|
#74 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 11:23 PM
|
#75 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
