![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Shanahan also picked Clady with a first rounder. I think taking a top tackle would be a good way to start rebuilding the line.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Remember that the last two expansion franchises started with quarterbacks, and got nothing out of them not because the picks were all that terrible, but because when the QB is the first part, and not part of an existing system, there's nothing to build on, no place to go. And David Carr got to play with Andre Johnson for the better part of four seasons.
It's not that you have to have a pro bowl offensive line to draft a QB, not that you have to spend a top five pick on a receiver first, but you should have SOMETHING. It's my conclusion that the Redskins have a pair of TEs right now, and nothing more but potential prospects and non-prospects.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
If JC isn't veiwed as the future here, than I think Shanny needs a qb pick this year. Doesn't have to be the 1st round, but would almost have to be this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Smoot mentioned McClain, LB from bama, the other day. I think Smoot, you said there was some early interest from the skins?
Regardless, just want to remind everyone that the 1st pick is likely not a debate simply of qb v. O line w/the new regime. I'm sure there are some defensive players that they like quite a bit. Seems this draft is tilted to defense in the top players. If the 1st 3 picks are Clausen, Okung & Berry, I think Suh is too much to pass up. It is not all that unrealistic. That's kind of what I'm hoping for, and that we draft o line in the 2nd & get D. LeFevour in the 3rd via trade or 4th. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
Anyway, dude is a beast & I agree w/the sleeper call, especially if the 4-3 system is kept in place. In the pregame last night several teamates talked about how well he quarterbacks the D. Would be a good replacement of Fletcher. Not sure HB Blades is the long term answer at MLB. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
St Louis...not sure they'll pass on Suh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Replace Fletcher? You serious?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
At this point, but after the combine, interviews, workouts, etc. he may be considered worth the #4. If you want a LB to call signals & make plays, it's worth using a high pick IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I wanted to go through and declare the best QB picked in the first round in every three year window going back to 1991.
1991-1993 Brett Favre 1992-1994 Drew Bledsoe 1993-1995 Steve McNair 1994-1996 Steve McNair 1995-1997 Steve McNair 1996-1998 Peyton Manning 1997-1999 Peyton Manning 1998-2000 Peyton Manning 1999-2001 Chad Pennington OR Drew Brees 2000-2002 Chad Pennington OR Drew Brees 2001-2003 Carson Palmer OR Drew Brees 2002-2004 Philip Rivers or Ben Roethlisberger 2003-2005 Philip Rivers or Ben Roethlisberger 2004-2006 Philip Rivers or Ben Roethlisberger 2005-2007 Aaron Rodgers or Jay Cutler or Vince Young or Jason Campbell or Kevin Kolb or something 2006-2008 Matt Ryan 2007-2009 Matt Ryan If you don't count anyone in my hodgepodge mess of 2005-2007 where I don't feel there's a clear cut best quarterback drafted in those three years (most would say Rodgers, but that's based on this year alone...I'd go Young, gun to my head, also based on this year alone), there's been 10 different passers to lead this category since 1991, but 16 different opportunities. Basically, I think there's been a lot of underwhelming quarterback classes. At times, the league has gone more than three years without a surefire success story at QB, and even moving Matt Ryan to that category might be a little premature.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Also if, and I'm not sure we will, we switch to a 3-4 McLain makes sense
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I think Iupati could be the Michael Oher of next year. I Love this guy, the problem is theres no reason for us to take him with the 4th overall pick, which will probably be a QB or OT. Plus in Free Agency is Guards Chester Pitts and Cris Kuper from Houston and Denver, so they already know the offense. And with our second rounder, we'll probably get whatever position we don't get with our first round pick. I personally think we should get Bradford, because all I keep hearing is how he is "super accurate" "good at getting rid of the ball and releasing it quickly" how he can "make all the NFL throws" and is "accuate when he is on the run as well". When I look at a QB the number one thing I'm looking at is is he accurate? Can he get the balls to his receivers? Thats this guy. This guy doesn't come out every year. Russell Okung and Anthony Davis type LT's come out pretty much every year. Plus you look at some of the LT's in the NFL and a lot of them are found pretty much from all the rounds of the draft. QB's that are good are typically in the first round. We've had Jason for 5 years and of the 4 he's played he really hasn't shown me he can be the QB that could take us to the Super Bowl. He's showed me that he can be a back up and fill in if the starting QB gets injured, but thats it. I have more bad memories and moments of Jason than positive moments of him (the time against the Giants he threw and interception 5yds passed the line of scrimmage really sticks out, as well as the games against Dallas, Pittsburgh, Giants where he held onto the ball way way too long, where he should have thrown it away. Pretty much every game which he throws a pass that ends up being a yard short of the first down, instead of going deep.Against the Saints when he was picked off against Vilma and Giants when he stepped way to far back in the pocket and Osi stripped him and ran the fumble in for a score. The only positive moment I have of Jason is when he threw that bomb against the saints a year ago to win, then again that seems to be the only highlight of jason that espn and nfln seem to show when they talk about him)
So I say we draft Sam Bradford and make him the opening day starter, and deal with the OL in FA and what ever we don't get there, get in the draft, which we will. Who knows maybe Bruce campbell of Maryland falls to us in the second round or Bryan Bulaga of Iowa or Jason Fox (he should definitley be there) or a Ciron Black or maybe who knows a Trent Williams could fall just enough for us to trade up |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
^ I think you are dreaming! Not many of those all pro caliber tackles will be around in the 2nd round. This year seems a little shallow on OL prospects. I'm no expert, but in AllenHan I trust!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Ok, so I know some people on this board want Sam Bradford, and others don't. For those of you who don't want him, I think you should atleast watch these two videos of Super Accurate Sam, before you completely write him off. This is all of his passes from the national championship game, against the top ranked defense of florida who has atleast 3 first round picks starting for them in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
The guy isn't garbage, but he isn't a franchise QB IMO. Can he be solid at the next level, possibly in the right situation. But I don't waste the #4 overall pick on him.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|