Why Jason Campbell should stay in DC.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

so smoot, a few questions for the rumor-starved:

1) when will he be traded?
2) who are currently the most likely partners (we've heard 5 teams mentioned before)?
3) what are we likely go accept for him?

[SBXVII]

Big, I know it wasn't addressed to me but I keep hearing...

Panthers
Raiders
Bronco's (with a package for Marshall)
Bills

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Big, I know it wasn't addressed to me but I keep hearing...

Panthers
Raiders
Bronco's (with a package for Marshall)
Bills

why would Denver want Campbell,Orton and Quinn?

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Big, I know it wasn't addressed to me but I keep hearing...

Panthers
Raiders
Bronco's (with a package for Marshall)
Bills

Thanks, do you mind saying where you're hearing this information? are these teams genuinely interested or are these just the teams we're trying to push him on?

personally, i'd love to trade Campbell and swap first rounders with Denver in exchange for Marshall. i'd also rather get a conditional 2011 pick that could increase to a 3rd than just take a 5th or 6th rounder in this years draft.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

why would Denver want Campbell,Orton and Quinn?

A better question would be: why would any team want any of them?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

so smoot, a few questions for the rumor-starved:

1) when will he be traded?
2) who are currently the most likely partners (we've heard 5 teams mentioned before)?
3) what are we likely go accept for him?

1. I'm guessing my day 2 of the draft at the latest
2. Bills, Raiders, Jaguars, Panthers (in that order)
3. Between a 3rd and 5th (or some combination)

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

why would Denver want Campbell,Orton and Quinn?

JC is an upgrade over either, ESPECIALLY Quinn.

I doubt they'd want another new QB though this offseason though, they already picked up a big name (small game) QB with Brady Quinn.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

1. I'm guessing my day 2 of the draft at the latest
2. Bills, Raiders, Jaguars, Panthers (in that order)
3. Between a 3rd and 5th (or some combination)

thanks for the info. Raiders would definitely be the best deal for us, as their picks are higher. Panthers would probably be the best opportunity for Campbell.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

thanks for the info. Raiders would definitely be the best deal for us, as their picks are higher. Panthers would probably be the best opportunity for Campbell.

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

horrible, meddling owner. horrible head coach. that may have accurately described the 2008 and 2009 redskins, but its no longer the case here. i'm pretty sure no one will trade anything of value for campbell unless that team gets a reasonable assurance from campbell that he'd sign an extension with the team. no way campbell does that with oakland.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

I agree. If he doesn't mind the bitter slice of humble pie that comes with the #2 QB slot, i would LOVE him backing up Donovan McNabb. Unless the o-line is drasticly improved, McNabb won't last that long. Not that he's a stranger to 40+ sack seasons, he isn't getting younger. I just guess we'll have to wait and hope we do a lot during the time of the draft with rookies and trades to get a better o-line for McNabb

[CRedskinsRule]

kjohnsoncsn via twitter

Jason Campbell tells me he doesn't know if he'll attend mini camp;it's voluntary; He's still exploring trade opport's 2 be starter somewhere

[freddyg12]

this is a good thread, considering the lull before the draft. for all those that don't want to talk about JC at least it's not the same old he's good v. get rid of him debate; we're now talking about what's best for him more so than the skins.

I like the intent of the first post; that his career will be better if he stays. Given McNabb's age & potential for injury the #2 job here might see some serious time. I'm hoping that he stays & ends up winning some games for us, reclaims the starting job & re-signs. I realize that is highly unlikely though.

At this point it's purely fate as to how his career pans out, he's not good enough to excel in sub-par circumstances, such as he's had here. I think the possibilities have been thrown out there in this thread & when you look around the league, Oakland really is the most in need. Cleveland I guess is too. He's young, so what looks bad now might be alright in a couple of years. I don't see any team giving him much more than a 2 year deal either, so if & when he leaves DC, there's a good chance it won't be his last time going to another team.

[RedTempleSkin]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

That would not be the case, Panthers have a line that I wish we have. The running game has to be one of the top 3 in football. They do however have only one receiver.

[jdc65]

I believe the Panthers are committed to Matt Moore for the foreseeable future, and the Raiders like Gronkowski. I don't think any teams will give him a real shot at winning a starting role this year, except maybe as a caretaker to a high draft pick. I think he may want to leave just because of everything that happened here, but if he really looks around the league, he might realize this is his best option. I think Shanahan really wants him here as a dependable back-up and capable starter. He is not worth trading for a 4th round pick in my opinion.