|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-24-2012, 11:33 PM | #61 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Just teasing. We all have typos sooner or later.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
Advertisements |
07-27-2012, 02:19 PM | #62 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Shannahan bragged about how far Maurice hurt has come in his press conference, saying that him and Polumbus along with Smith would compete for the RT spot.
|
07-27-2012, 02:50 PM | #63 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Quote:
When Jamal Brown tweaked his hip i was wondering why Polumbus was the guy filling in. I think out of the 3 Willie Smith is the best followed by Polumbus then Hurt. With Polumbus only being better than Hurt because of his experience with Shanahan and both the tackle and guard positions. My speculation (thats what we do around here right?) is that they wanted to keep Willie Smith as Trent's primary back up and then Polumbus OR Hurt as the primary RT back up who can also easily go in at either Guard position when in a pinch. So when Jammal first tweaked his hip they didnt put Willie in at RT because they wanted him to take reps at LT with the second team since that would be his primary roll. So now im thinking maybe theyre giving up on Brown if theyre gonna let Smith fight for the RT position and not serve as the primary backup to RGIIIs blind side. Or maybe im reading waayyy to much into very minor things....
__________________
|
|
07-27-2012, 05:06 PM | #64 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
From da man himself:
Quote:
|
|
07-27-2012, 11:44 PM | #65 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
I don't like it that Shanahans putting Compton behind Trent at LT. He should be trying out at the RT position if Trent really is our guy. And especially if Jamaal is injured all the time.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
07-28-2012, 12:04 AM | #66 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Compton is a 6th round pick aka developmental. I think they're planning on Trent playing every snap and, if so, his backup is not relevant.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
07-28-2012, 12:14 AM | #67 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Quote:
It makes perfect sense for Polumbus, Willie Smith and Maurice Hurt to compete at RT as opposed to Compton. Mr.Glass brittle hips all but guarantees that the back-up RT will start/play in a fair share of games if not become the opening day starter. And unlike Compton; Tyler, Willie and Mau all know this ZBS scheme and have played/started in actual NFL games. I don't see how/why grooming Compton as Trent William's back-up says anything about whether 'Trent really is our guy'. |
|
07-28-2012, 12:22 AM | #68 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Quote:
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
07-28-2012, 12:33 AM | #69 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Quote:
A 6th round pick with 0 games started, 0 games played doesn't 'deserve' anything because they haven't earned it yet. They certainly don't deserve playing time over guys that have actually played, started and performed in actual NFL games, regardless of draft position. And again, what does playing Compton as Trent's back-up say about whether or not 'Trent is our guy' |
|
07-28-2012, 04:10 AM | #70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Trent is the guy because of his cap number. The question is: can you rely on him? I think the speculation here is, going into the off-season, there was a need to improve LT depth. Was/is Compton the answer? Only time will tell.
|
07-28-2012, 07:28 AM | #71 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
lol, you think Trent is the guy because of his cap number?
No offense but that is absurd; Trent's talent is so obvious this statement just seems crazy to me. Trent would be the guy if he walked in off the street the day before the Saints game. Quote:
Here's how I see it. There are already 3 possible back-ups RT ahead of him: Polombus, Willie Smith and Maurice Hurt there is only 1 guy ahead of him at LT Willie Smith. Having a 3rd guy that can play LT is more valueable then having a 4th guy at RT. |
|
07-28-2012, 03:48 PM | #72 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
IMO they are trying Compton on the LT spot to see if he can play multiple positions.
|
07-30-2012, 01:26 AM | #73 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
07-30-2012, 06:54 AM | #74 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,477
|
Re: CSN: "The 53: OL starters look set, battles for reserve spots"
Well I guess my question of "is there tobacco pipes for women" can finally be answered.
|
|
|