Post your NFC East predictions here!

[DarkKnight]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

and let the Todd and Colt talk begin...........under what??????? never mind

[MiraclesHappen07]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

I think that is way to conservative an estimate for the NFC East teams.

We are all playing the NFC West and the AFC North this season. Those are not 2 divisions that you can label as "power houses" like the NFC East. The BEST record from 2007 from those 2 divisions is 10-6, and 5 of those 8 teams finished the regular season at .500 or worse. Only 2 of those teams made the post season, because they won thier respective divisions.

Now if the NFC East were playing the AFC South this season I would agree with you.

But other than the disparity between road vs home games and placement of team bye weeks, this is really a cake schedule for the NFC East. Once again our main opposition will come from within our own division.

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughtest. It always is, thats why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

[D'BOYZ]

Originally Posted by MiraclesHappen07

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughest. It always is, that's why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

I can Agree we are the toughest division in the NFL right now and the 90's but from the late 90's and early 00's this division was as soft as a marshmallow we didn't scared anything.

Let's get real when the best thing the division had to offer is the Eagles you don't have a very though division to begin with.

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by MiraclesHappen07

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughtest. It always is, thats why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

Although I concur with you, folks from the AFC South might have an arguement on that. That division also sent 3 teams to the post season last year. Indy, Jacksonville and Tennessee.

[JLW428]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. JC is the best QB we have. I would like to have this conversation again in week 8. I would be willing to bet that you are wrong. $$$?

[Cowell]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

Although I concur with you, folks from the AFC South might have an arguement on that. That division also sent 3 teams to the post season last year. Indy, Jacksonville and Tennessee.

This is true, but Tennessee shouldn't have been in there. They could barely beat the Colts backups to get into the playoffs. Also the NFC East has been tougher historically, this division just showed up on the radar a couple years ago.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by Cowell

This is true, but Tennessee shouldn't have been in there. They could barely beat the Colts backups to get into the playoffs. Also the NFC East has been tougher historically, this division just showed up on the radar a couple years ago.

Yeah and the NFC east is a better division over the last five seasons. Just because they were good last year doesn't make that division a powerhouse.

[WaldSkins]

Is anyone watching the Giants-Browns game, the gmens dline is putting some hurting on Derek Anderson. I hope our line holds up better then the Browns.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

Wow, I can understand that you aren't high on Campbell, but to say that Collins or Brennan are 6 games better...well, I believe there is a straightjacket with your name on it.
Even if we had Peyton Manning as our backup, that would not translate into 6 more wins for just 1 person.
About Campbell, we certainly saw some growing pains last year, but I think he's going to surprise you.

About predictions:
Redskins 11-5
Cowpatties 10-6
Giants 9-7
Eagles 7-9

[GTripp0012]

Jsarno is right on this one, six games is more than the difference between Jon Kitna and Tom Brady, in most estimations. It's pretty downright insane to suggest that Jason Campbell could be so bad that he could single handedly keep a 12-4 team out of the playoffs.

Downright insane.

[The Goat]

I see '08 as something of a repeat of '07. I definitely spect Philly to be at the bottom again w/ either Dono or Westbrook hurt for a while, plus the Philly d won't be as good (Dawkins ain't the same since he got rocked last year). We'll be next and just squeak into the playoffs if we're lucky. The giants will be next primarily because of their freakishly awesome defense and the emergence of Eli as a true elite QB. The Cowpokes have too much talent not to own the division once again, but I believe their coaching structure/confusion continues to thwart a serious playoff run. So...

Pokes: 12-4
Gmen: 11-5 (maybe 10-6)
Skins: 9-7
Eagles 7-9 (maybe 8-8)

[jdlea]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Jsarno is right on this one, six games is more than the difference between Jon Kitna and Tom Brady, in most estimations. It's pretty downright insane to suggest that Jason Campbell could be so bad that he could single handedly keep a 12-4 team out of the playoffs.

Downright insane.

Especially considering that the person stepping in for Campbell would either be Todd Collins or Colt Brennan.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by jsarno

Wow, I can understand that you aren't high on Campbell, but to say that Collins or Brennan are 6 games better...well, I believe there is a straightjacket with your name on it.
Even if we had Peyton Manning as our backup, that would not translate into 6 more wins for just 1 person.
About Campbell, we certainly saw some growing pains last year, but I think he's going to surprise you.

About predictions:
Redskins 11-5
Cowpatties 10-6
Giants 9-7
Eagles 7-9

I'll give you credit for even responding to that post with anything other than: RETARDED POST

[hesscl34]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I'll give you credit for even responding to that post with anything other than: RETARDED POST

Funny how you don't find JC critics calling you all RETARDED, in need of a straight jacket, or losing your minds for loving him so much. Where's the respect for having an opinion, even if it doesn’t agree with your own? Just my...

[irish]

Originally Posted by jdlea

Especially considering that the person stepping in for Campbell would either be Todd Collins or Colt Brennan.

Last time I checked Collins lead the Skins on an amazing end of the season win streak last year that put the team into the playoffs. If memory serves a lot of people on this site said the team would be screwed if TC had to play any significant amount of time (some wanted him gone because they thought he stunk in preseason, he did, and so much for preseason being a predictor of anything) and as it turned out he was the player that salvaged the season.