|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-02-2009, 12:42 PM | #76 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
I say a big no on extending JC because he has done little to get one. He is soso at best. Now if he burns up the league then he is going to make the Skins pay be the odds are that will not happen.
|
Advertisements |
04-02-2009, 12:45 PM | #77 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
Quote:
We can win with Campbell whether he's voted to the Pro Bowl or not. We did with Doug Williams and Mark Rypien, neither were "franchise", big-name QBs, but we built a great team around them. Sacrificing the years we've invested in Campbell and giving away future draft picks will not allow us to accomplish this again. Cutler's price and risk are both too high.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
04-02-2009, 01:28 PM | #78 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
Why would you extend Campbell if we haven't already? If we thought that he was worth extending we wouldn't be looking at Cutler, obviously. If we don't change QBs this year there's a very good chance we will next, unless Campbell plays lights out all year long.
|
04-02-2009, 04:25 PM | #79 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
Most of us had high expectations of Campbell going into last year, and he showed glimpses of greatness. Yes, he had his bad days, but as most of us pointed out already, that was due to a large number of factors including oline and coaching.
So I get the Campbell for Jay Cutler trade rumors cause people want better than what they have, problem is, not sure Cutler is indeed better, or a product of a MUCH MORE wide open offense. (note the ints) Although that is a comment for another thread. My biggest beef is the amount of "Redskins to trade up to get QB in draft" suggesting Sanchez. And of course those on here that don't think a lick of Campbell. What the hell happened people? When all of sudden did Campbell go from being a "promising qb with limitless potential", to a bum that we need to replace or run out of town on a rail?
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
04-02-2009, 04:26 PM | #80 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
When people on the internet said so, I guess.
I remember when people on the internet were Patrick Ramsey fans.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
04-02-2009, 04:28 PM | #81 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 36
|
Re: I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
Quote:
|
|
04-02-2009, 04:33 PM | #82 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
RedTempleSkin -- You mean a product of virtually the same offense we run here in DC? Oh what a shame.
No one is calling Jason Campbell trash. Jason Campbell is an okay QB in the NFL. He's a serviceable starter -- but he's not exactly a franchise QB. I think, as Redskins fans, we often end up over valuing our players. Every player that takes a snap in the NFL has the potential to be great, and often shows glimpses. But it really comes down to performance. While in football everyone must act as a cohesive unit, responsible players are also very responsible for their play. For instance, Jason Campbell gets sacked a lot. Part of this responsibility falls on the offensive line. Part of it also falls on Campbell. He's always trying to make a play, thus sometimes takes the big hit. It's a trade off. No one is calling Jason Campbell a bum, but when you compare him to a QB with the stature of Cutler, Jason Campbell is simply in a class below.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
04-02-2009, 04:39 PM | #83 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Re: I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
Quote:
|
|
04-02-2009, 05:05 PM | #84 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,399
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
Quote:
|
|
04-02-2009, 05:14 PM | #85 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: I'm confused...when EXACTLY did Campbell become trash?
Quote:
When people are ready to ship our starting QB off and ready to draft a kid to replace him they are basically saying he is a bum. I understand your points, I can see the lure of Cutler, but I am just not sure this is the answer...especially considering we would be taking a HIT to do so.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
04-02-2009, 05:19 PM | #86 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
Do not pay players until they earn it.
|
04-02-2009, 06:23 PM | #87 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
if we liked JC we would have extended him already...he's proven to be a mediocre QB so far, and if we get a chance to get Cutler...we will. So i'm planning on seeing Cutler in a Redskins Uniform next year. I think JC has had ample time to prove some kind of brilliance...i'm so tired of seeing him overthrow recievers and making awful reads...although I know a lot of that falls on the OL.
|
04-02-2009, 06:34 PM | #88 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?
Quote:
Cuter went to Chicago. |
|
|
|