Skins sell ticket straight to scalpers

[stu_nna]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Makes three of us

coming in 4th

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I'm having a hard time caring about any of this.

I can see that view. Most people don't care about what other people go through unless it affects them personally.

Since you don't care about the organization raping some people in it's fan base, do you care that the people in the ticket office contributed to creating a home field disadvantage against the Steelers game last year? Because every fan should be pissed and embarassed that our offense had to use a silent snap count in our own stadium.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

I can see that view. Most people don't care about what other people go through unless it affects them personally.

Since you don't care about the organization raping some people in it's fan base, do you care that the people in the ticket office contributed to creating a home field disadvantage against the Steelers game last year? Because every fan should be pissed and embarassed that our offense had to use a silent snap count in our own stadium.

That's pretty harsh really.


I suppose I care, but this just seems so dang out of whack. Heck didn't you see that DS is the 8th best owner according to Yahoo sports. Geez that proves everything. [/sarcasm]

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

I can see that view. Most people don't care about what other people go through unless it affects them personally.

Since you don't care about the organization raping some people in it's fan base, do you care that the people in the ticket office contributed to creating a home field disadvantage against the Steelers game last year? Because every fan should be pissed and embarassed that our offense had to use a silent snap count in our own stadium.

Actually I mostly don't care because I don't see what the big deal is. It's a business. I'm surprised people are surprised that profit maximizing goes on. I am surprised people are surprised the Skins sue people to pay their contractual obligations. I am surprised people think that Dan Snyder micromanages to a point where he'd have any idea how tickets get sold in the ticket office with any pertinent amount of detail. Mostly I am NOT surprised at the "outrage" since there are certain segments for people who are never going to care for the FO under Dan Snyder no matter what. With the WaPo leading that charge.

And no the issue with the Steelers game wasn't largely the team's fault. The issue is that lots of people sold their tickets. The tickets are expensive and games require commitment. Some people don't have that time and money. The size of the stadium increases the likelihood that there are a good number of "fans" who sell their tickets and there always will be, whether the team is winning games or not.

[souperbad]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

And no the issue with the Steelers game wasn't largely the team's fault. The issue is that lots of people sold their tickets..

I care about this issue but I agree that the Steelers game has NOTHING to do with this issue. People need to realize that the Steelers game was a fact of economic life...a perfect storm if you will...and it will happen again.

Fact #1) Nobody lives western PA anymore. There are no jobs in Pittsburgh. All of the Steelers fans have moved here. In every job I have ever had...there has always been 1 or 2 transplants from PA working with me. I am sure you all have notices this too. This fact is called, "High Demand."

Fact #2) The Steelers coming to DC for a regular season game is a very rare occurence. Under the current NFL schedule rotation, the Steelers will come to Fed Ex once every 8 years. But last year was the first time, I can't rememeber the Steelers comeing to DC for a regular season game in my lifetime. This makes the event a rare occurence. This fact is called "Low Supply"

Fact #3) Season Ticker Holders don't go to every game. They pay a lot of money for their seats and they sell some games each year to make up their losses. They tend to sell the games that differ from their Sunday Game Day Football Routine. They also sell games that bring a lot of money ...such as a high demand low supply Steelers Game. Season ticket holders take a beating on the pre-season games and other lame games like the St. Louis, Kansas City and such.

It will happen again when the Steelers come back to town.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by souperbad

I care about this issue but I agree that the Steelers game has NOTHING to do with this issue. People need to realize that the Steelers game was a fact of economic life...a perfect storm if you will...and it will happen again.

Fact #1) Nobody lives western PA anymore. There are no jobs in Pittsburgh. All of the Steelers fans have moved here. In every job I have ever had...there has always been 1 or 2 transplants from PA working with me. I am sure you all have notices this too. This fact is called, "High Demand."

Fact #2) The Steelers coming to DC for a regular season game is a very rare occurence. Under the current NFL schedule rotation, the Steelers will come to Fed Ex once every 8 years. But last year was the first time, I can't rememeber the Steelers comeing to DC for a regular season game in my lifetime. This makes the event a rare occurence. This fact is called "Low Supply"

Fact #3) Season Ticker Holders don't go to every game. They pay a lot of money for their seats and they sell some games each year to make up their losses. They tend to sell the games that differ from their Sunday Game Day Football Routine. They also sell games that bring a lot of money ...such as a high demand low supply Steelers Game. Season ticket holders take a beating on the pre-season games and other lame games like the St. Louis, Kansas City and such.

It will happen again when the Steelers come back to town.

I will also mention that I do not blame any fan who sold their tickets to a Steelers fan. If someone can pay for their season tickets for the year by selling one or two games to an opposing fan, more power to them.

Snyder does the exact same thing so I will never criticize a fan for doing it. He had made gameday such an expensive event that people are foolish not to sell a game or two.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

I can see that view. Most people don't care about what other people go through unless it affects them personally.

Oh, and as for this snarky shot I would caution you against making assumptions about how much I care about other people. I care plenty. I also think the deadbeats ought to pay their contractual obligations. Financial circumstances not-withstanding they still owe the money. If you can show me how the team is "raping" anyone maybe I'll care.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Oh, and as for this snarky shot I would caution you against making assumptions about how much I care about other people. I care plenty. I also think the deadbeats ought to pay their contractual obligations. Financial circumstances not-withstanding they still owe the money. If you can show me how the team is "raping" anyone maybe I'll care.

There was nothing snarky about it. I bet if it was your 72 year old family member who has supported the team for 50 years, you would have a different viewpoint. You don't care about these Redskins fans and how they have been treated by the team and no one said that you have to. Caution me all you want. I could care less about what concerns you.

When they sue someone for the face value of the tickets associated with a contract along with the legal fees associated with the judgement and then resell those same tickets to a ticket broker or someone else, that is raping your fanbase in my book. People can call it maximizing profits or whatever you want but I think it is wrong to treat people that way. Especially when you lie to everyone who will listen and say the wait list is 160,000. Now, if they come out and say that people defaulting on obligations is negatively impacting the business, then I would cut them some slack. But they have never said that. They consistently boast that there are thousands upon thousands of people waiting to buy season tickets. If that was the case, why even go through the trouble to sue someone who has hit hard times, just call the next person on the list.

Here is another example of Snyder blatently lying to us. He came on 980 and said that the new tailgaiting rules would actually make things better for the fans. I spoke to my brother in law who went to the Pats game and confirmed that Snyder's spin was just untrue. If you want to grill out and have a typical tailgate, you better get there very early and get ready to park in the furthest row in your section. This change was to maximize parking revenue, not enhance anything for the fans.

I am just tired of hearing them blatently lie to their fans.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

There was nothing snarky about it. I bet if it was your 72 year old family member who has supported the team for 50 years, you would have a different viewpoint. You don't care about these Redskins fans and how they have been treated by the team and no one said that you have to. Caution me all you want. I could care less about what concerns you.

I think we can all agree none of us care about anyone else...except Matty, we have to at least pretend we care about him. Otherwise, there would be no place for us to tell each other how much we don't care about each other.

When they sue someone for the face value of the tickets associated with a contract along with the legal fees associated with the judgement and then resell those same tickets to a ticket broker or someone else, that is raping your fanbase in my book.

Again, a last resort. An unfortunate last resort. Legally right, morally questionable certainly.

People can call it maximizing profits or whatever you want but I think it is wrong to treat people that way. Especially when you lie to everyone who will listen and say the wait list is 160,000. Now, if they come out and say that people defaulting on obligations is negatively impacting the business, then I would cut them some slack.

I don't buy that. No one believes it any time the Redskins say that anything is negatively impacting the business. Because the response is "Well how did you afford to pay Haynesworth $100 million?" And again, the question of the wait list has been an issue lonnnng before Snyder.

Here is another example of Snyder blatently lying to us. He came on 980 and said that the new tailgaiting rules would actually make things better for the fans. I spoke to my brother in law who went to the Pats game and confirmed that Snyder's spin was just untrue. If you want to grill out and have a typical tailgate, you better get there very early and get ready to park in the furthest row in your section. This change was to maximize parking revenue, not enhance anything for the fans.

Well if your brother in law says it's a lie, then it must be

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Oh, and as for this snarky shot I would caution you against making assumptions about how much I care about other people. I care plenty. I also think the deadbeats ought to pay their contractual obligations. Financial circumstances not-withstanding they still owe the money. If you can show me how the team is "raping" anyone maybe I'll care.

But you don't understand. This isn't a business we're talking about. It's just a game. The Redskins don't have bills to pay

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

But you don't understand. This isn't a business we're talking about. It's just a game. The Redskins don't have bills to pay

Smoot, if they come out and say that they cannot sell the tickets on defaulted contracts and that these people are creating a significant drain on their revenue, I would side with them. They have never said that. They talk about the 160,000 strong waiting list.

Which is it?

[redsk1]

Damn..someone made the Wash Post angry. Real angry. I see both sides of the issue. A contract is a promise to pay. However, it could probably be handled a little better on the Skins side too. Let's face it, they should be trying to build up a little more goodwill than they have over the last 10 years. If there is $150,000 on the waiting list for "general admission" then they should just turn around and sell the cancel seasons tix. If it's corporated, then charge the customer cancelling until it gets resold. Goodwill and a good public image goes a long way. I'm sure the skins aren't the only ones doing it though.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by redsk1

Damn..someone made the Wash Post angry. Real angry. I see both sides of the issue. A contract is a promise to pay. However, it could probably be handled a little better on the Skins side too. Let's face it, they should be trying to build up a little more goodwill than they have over the last 10 years. If there is $150,000 on the waiting list for "general admission" then they should just turn around and sell the cancel seasons tix. If it's corporated, then charge the customer cancelling until it gets resold. Goodwill and a good public image goes a long way. I'm sure the skins aren't the only ones doing it though.

All good points. It's also kind of buried though that suing is a last resort for the team.

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

All good points. It's also kind of buried though that suing is a last resort for the team.

Yea, i'm ready for some football now. PS game tonight and then it's almost game week.

[souperbad]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

All good points. It's also kind of buried though that suing is a last resort for the team.

I would not say that its "buried" It's pretty obvious. Suing is always a last resort.