Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2010, 08:48 PM   #76
BleedBurgundy
Playmaker
 
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR



this guy says kelly is too fragile for the nfl...
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit."

Thomas Paine
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-30-2010, 09:03 PM   #77
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post


Welcome to the team, Terrence Austin.

Not so bad Buster that Terrence is on the team. I think our newbies will work out nicely. At least they are healthy and have fought to be on the team. The guys on the Bryant thread informed us of all the WR studs coming out next year for the draft!!!
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 09:13 PM   #78
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Can't see trusting that he'll ever be fully healthy. A freaking hamstring shouldn't sideline you for months.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 09:55 PM   #79
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedBurgundy View Post


this guy says kelly is too fragile for the nfl...

LMAO. Somebodies going to HELL!
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:15 PM   #80
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
Well what is the inside word on his condition and do yo believe he makes this team?
Don't know his condition. As recently as this morning I was one of many "insiders" convinced he was a lock to make the team. Not as sure anymore

But you guys do realize this means we're getting DeSean Jackson in 5-10 years, right? Think about it, 1994 (or thereabouts), Casserly wants speedy, small Joey Galloway, Turner wants and gets big, tall Michael Westbrook. Now?Galloway a redskin, Westbrook out of the league. 2001 Snyder wants speedy, small Santana Moss, Marty wants and gets big, tall Rod Gardner. now? moss a redskin, gardner out of the league. 2008 Beemnseven wants small, speedy DeSean Jackson, Vinny wants and gets big, tall Malcolm Kelly. Now? Vinny out of the league...
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:20 PM   #81
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

How can he make the team unless they put him on IR? I say ditch him as cold as that sounds. The guys we have now should do fine, plus we can always draft a guy next season or two.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:20 PM   #82
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Don't know his condition. As recently as this morning I was one of many "insiders" convinced he was a lock to make the team. Not as sure anymore

But you guys do realize this means we're getting DeSean Jackson in 5-10 years, right? Think about it, 1994 (or thereabouts), Casserly wants speedy, small Joey Galloway, Turner wants and gets big, tall Michael Westbrook. Now?Galloway a redskin, Westbrook out of the league. 2001 Snyder wants speedy, small Santana Moss, Marty wants and gets big, tall Rod Gardner. now? moss a redskin, gardner out of the league. 2008 Beemnseven wants small, speedy DeSean Jackson, Vinny wants and gets big, tall Malcolm Kelly. Now? Vinny out of the league...
So were going to get beemnseven?
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:26 PM   #83
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Don't know his condition. As recently as this morning I was one of many "insiders" convinced he was a lock to make the team. Not as sure anymore

But you guys do realize this means we're getting DeSean Jackson in 5-10 years, right? Think about it, 1994 (or thereabouts), Casserly wants speedy, small Joey Galloway, Turner wants and gets big, tall Michael Westbrook. Now?Galloway a redskin, Westbrook out of the league. 2001 Snyder wants speedy, small Santana Moss, Marty wants and gets big, tall Rod Gardner. now? moss a redskin, gardner out of the league. 2008 Beemnseven wants small, speedy DeSean Jackson, Vinny wants and gets big, tall Malcolm Kelly. Now? Vinny out of the league...

Good call. We will just get by until then, and then.... Championship!
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:50 PM   #84
drew54
The Starter
 
drew54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,324
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

IMO this goes to show when drafting WR the priorities should always go hands, speed, route running, and last and least size.
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds.
drew54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 12:02 AM   #85
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Hands and speed are definitely tops.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 12:24 AM   #86
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew54 View Post
IMO this goes to show when drafting WR the priorities should always go hands, speed, route running, and last and least size.
aside from size isn't that about the order of Kelly's strengths?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 01:13 AM   #87
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew54 View Post
IMO this goes to show when drafting WR the priorities should always go hands, speed, route running, and last and least size.
I say it's route running, hands, agility, speed, then size. To me this is how Jerry Rice became the greatest receiver of all time. Route running is first because if you can't get open then it doesn't matter how great your hands are. It's also above speed because when you can't run routes you simply run into coverage faster, at least at the NFL level. Also agility is above speed in part because it goes hand in hand with route running. Being able to execute double moves and quick cuts is essential to being a top receiver.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 01:20 AM   #88
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
You say that like Kelly is getting hurt in the games and from hits. Thats not the case.
Gary Clark had CHRONIC hamstring issues, but he found a way to suck it up for his team on Sundays. I just don't see that kind of toughness in Malcolm Kelly's make-up.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:35 AM   #89
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

For what it's worth though, Kelly was active for all 16 games last year
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 08:54 AM   #90
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

What's the impact of going on IR? I know he can't play all year, but what does the team owe him? base salary is about all he's got on his contract. He's not making a ton of $.

I think IR would be good for him. Give him a year to think about it, get himself healthy & develop a routine for stretching & workouts.

Anything I'm missing? I just don't see what the team stands to lose putting him on IR, assuming he meets the criteria by league rules.

If not IR, I say keep him before galloway.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.67587 seconds with 10 queries