Five-year-old boy accidentally shoots, kills sister

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Not much different than the shit you have been slinging.
Why dont you go cry to some Giants fans....

I keep the football stuff where it belongs and that's not here, this section of the forums has nothing to do with football.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

Not much different than the shit you have been slinging.
....

.... a tremendous difference.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Giantone

.... a tremendous difference.

Do you need a box of tissues?

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Giantone

.... a tremendous difference.

The exchange rate is more than fair, you've used 'Right-wing gun nut' multiple times.

I doubt very much that any of the pro-gun rights people on this board are 'Right-wing gun nuts, but that wouldn't fit in with your bed-wetting hysterical viewpoint, would it?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I see you can make jokes as others lose their lives, interesting how you right wing gun nuts do that try and make things lite ,spin it to suit you.



Jeffrey Nugent says his brother Ted Nugent is wrong on background checks - The Washington Post

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, gives one students opinion .

So, you call me a right wing gun nut (I promise I am neither), push an article that is one guys impassioned opinion, than bash another article as a student's opinion.

and you conveniently ignore any facts in any of the points presented against your position.

one of the worst thing about the state of our country's political discourse is that it is wrapped up in hyperbole, highly emotionalized, and mostly lacking in rational critical discussion.

if Sandy, and Moore, have shown us anything, life is given and taken in tragedy every day, I am done trying to explain why "just one life" is an emotionally cynical push to get a bad law passed that normally would not have a chance.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

if Sandy, and Moore, have shown us anything, life is given and taken in tragedy every day, I am done trying to explain why "just one life" is an emotionally cynical push to get a bad law passed that normally would not have a chance.

1)Sandy and Moore are two completely different thing and Ray Charles could see that.
2) It's not that "you're done explaining" ,fact is you still haven't come up with any good reason yet why if a law that one side says won't work anyway, saves just one life ...is a bad law .

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

1)Sandy and Moore are two completely different thing and Ray Charles could see that.
2) It's not that "you're done explaining" ,fact is you still haven't come up with any good reason yet why if a law that one side says won't work anyway, saves just one life ...is a bad law .

Fact is you have not responded with one reason that says it is not a bad law, and I have listed several reasons why the justification of "saving just one life" is a bad method for writing new laws.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Giantone

1)Sandy and Moore are two completely different thing and Ray Charles could see that.
2) It's not that "you're done explaining" ,fact is you still haven't come up with any good reason yet why if a law that one side says won't work anyway, saves just one life ...is a bad law .

A law that saves one life is just a bad law. Then we would not have anymore buckets, electricity, cars, bikes, plane, trains, bath tub, showers, etc... I could go on all day. Just about everything we make has killed one person in some way so if your willing to make a law to save one life lets not stop there.

BTW I forgot football and how many people have died playing the game.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by firstdown

A law that saves one life is just a bad law. .

If any parent that has lost a child has a choice and that one law would save their child how much you wanna bet it wouldn't be a bad law?

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Giantone

If any parent that has lost a child has a choice and that one law would save their child how much you wanna bet it wouldn't be a bad law?

They have already lost a child, how would that law save anyone? All your suggesting is allowing piss poor parenting to be hand-held by the rest of society.

No.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by Giantone

If any parent that has lost a child has a choice and that one law would save their child how much you wanna bet it wouldn't be a bad law?

Then address the post above yours.
Would you ban field trips?

(this is so looney I cant believe I'm even asking this question)

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Giantone

lol, I see I hit a nerve with the PEP Boys of the board.

I just explained the insult exchange rate, nothing more. You give yourself too much credit.

[CRedskinsRule]

Law Banning 4th Grade field trips enacted after tragedy:

1 child dead, 1 missing after landslide sweeps over fourth-graders on field trip in Minn. | Fox News

[/sarcasm]

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Law Banning 4th Grade field trips enacted after tragedy:

1 child dead, 1 missing after landslide sweeps over fourth-graders on field trip in Minn. | Fox News

[/sarcasm]

Ok, I'll agree to that law and you must agree to a law where no child under the age of 15 can have a gun

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Ok, I'll agree to that law and you must agree to a law where no child under the age of 15 can have a gun

I wouldn't agree to either law, because both would be based on flawed logic.

edit: on reflection, I am pretty sure most laws don't allow children under 15 to purchase or own guns so I guess you are on your way to banning field trips.