Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2015, 11:24 PM   #76
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

In a world where Rex Grossman can take you to the Big Dance...anything is possible. Granted, these guys do not appear to be diamonds in the rough, but put a better line in front of them, and good things will be realized. A little coaching up and JG hopefully installing more of his guys in place. SM at the helm of the talent ship.
For the time being, I'm feeling better about this team than I have in years......HTTR
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-18-2015, 05:58 AM   #77
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,101
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Colt is back:
Yes indeed...
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!!
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 02:03 PM   #78
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Have it your way. Six wins. Still not good enough.


Anyone with SB dreams this year is going to be disappointed. It's year 1 of building this shit the right way. I'm almost going to hope for another top 10 pick to get this team stocked up again.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 02:45 PM   #79
donofriose
The Starter
 
donofriose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,097
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Have it your way. Six wins. Still not good enough.
What are your expectations?
donofriose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 04:42 PM   #80
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Anyone with SB dreams this year is going to be disappointed. It's year 1 of building this shit the right way. I'm almost going to hope for another top 10 pick to get this team stocked up again.
Yeah, the way I see this year is that you'll see a team that is much more competitive than what has been put out on the field the last two seasons. However, despite the competitiveness, I don't think that is going to equate into more wins (more than six that is.) But I think we'll see progress on the field.

with that said, to have another top 10 pick would be great.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 05:13 PM   #81
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

i also want the best draft position possible. (i wish we sucked for luck)

im not knocking the colt signing at all, pennies on the dollar .... but i dont get the need to sign him now. why not sign him in july. why not leave the QB3 spot open just in case we want to bring in a pat white for PS purposes or take a flyer on a UDFA?

its not a big deal but i dont see the timing of it (unless another team was close to signing him).
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 05:38 PM   #82
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by donofriose View Post
What are your expectations?
Not asking for a Super Bowl.

Anything short of 8-8 makes us losers (again) but the goal of the game is to win. Math tells us we should always be trying to finish at least 8-8 IMO.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 06:06 PM   #83
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Not asking for a Super Bowl.

Anything short of 8-8 makes us losers (again) but the goal of the game is to win. Math tells us we should always be trying to finish at least 8-8 IMO.
You forgot to mention that Bruce Allen eats babies.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 06:21 PM   #84
Skinzman
The Starter
 
Skinzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain View Post
i also want the best draft position possible. (i wish we sucked for luck)

im not knocking the colt signing at all, pennies on the dollar .... but i dont get the need to sign him now. why not sign him in july. why not leave the QB3 spot open just in case we want to bring in a pat white for PS purposes or take a flyer on a UDFA?

its not a big deal but i dont see the timing of it (unless another team was close to signing him).
You can have up to 90 players on the roster during the off season. I fail to see how this means we cant bring in another QB to compete for a job. We can have QB4, QB5, and QB6 if we want at this time of the year.
Skinzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 06:52 PM   #85
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Yeah McCoy could easily be cut later on if needed. No biggie.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 06:54 PM   #86
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Not asking for a Super Bowl.

Anything short of 8-8 makes us losers (again) but the goal of the game is to win. Math tells us we should always be trying to finish at least 8-8 IMO.
Shooting for mediocrity eh?

I could really care less how we finish this year. I'm more interested in what happens 2-3 years from now.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 07:42 PM   #87
Kope
Special Teams
 
Kope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shooting for mediocrity eh?

I could really care less how we finish this year. I'm more interested in what happens 2-3 years from now.
This
Kope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 08:35 PM   #88
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

average coaching and QB play should get us to around 8 wins. if we fall short, those are two spots you have to look at for change. I think they've done enough on D to keep us from losing games there (assuming the grab a pass rusher in the draft). without at least average QB play, you'll never get anywhere though.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 10:24 AM   #89
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
You forgot to mention that Bruce Allen eats babies.
I understand why you would disagree with me about Bruce Allen. I'm just another ignorant fan.

But Smootsmack has insight into the workings of Redskins Park. And when Reid wrote that Bruce Allen should be fired for incompetence, this is what SS said about Reid:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
he was on point about what has been happening with the organization more than most reporters/columnists covering the team.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 11:58 AM   #90
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Redskins reportedly are not bringing back Colt McCoy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinzman View Post
You can have up to 90 players on the roster during the off season. I fail to see how this means we cant bring in another QB to compete for a job. We can have QB4, QB5, and QB6 if we want at this time of the year.
you're right. if there is no guaranteed money it doesnt matter. i was thinking 53 (or 54 or whatever the active roster is now) and not the expanded roster.
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.12264 seconds with 10 queries