Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2012, 08:58 PM   #961
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If the Rams draft RGIII they are essentially 'giving up' on Bradford.
There is no way the asking price for a passed over QB is gonna be anywhere near 2 first round picks.
30gut is offline  

Advertisements
Old 02-04-2012, 09:41 PM   #962
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
I smell desperation to get a QB. This talk of giving a ton to get a Qb is crazy.
Depends on the QB. If you're giving up potential Orakpo, Williams, and Kerrigan for Blaine Gabbert then yes. If you're giving up those potential type players for Andrew Luck then you bet your ass it's worth it.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 09:46 PM   #963
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Man, I hope Andrew Luck is as good as advertised.

I really could see this draft having a Leaf/Schuler effect going on. I know Luck is categorized as the next great QB, but how many times have we heard this kind of hype just to be let down. You never know with these kids.

I for one am not willing to part with all that it would take to get Luck.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 02:41 AM   #964
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins5044 View Post
the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.
And there in lies my point. IF Bradford was such a good QB or a franchise QB they would not be getting g rid of him after only a few yrs. There is no reason to give up 2 first RD picks, heck I don't think I would give up one first RD pick.

Now if the Rams are giving the Skins their #2 pick then yes I guess 2 first RD picks but not for Bradford. My fear is the team tosses in several waisted picks for Bradford who's not going to do much better then Grossman and still be the same old Bradford cause our OL is not any better then the Rams was.

I think the most obsurd statements by the media is its ok for the Skins to give up several picks to the Rams because the Rams have need of them and are "rebuilding". But apparently the Skins are not rebuilding like MS said the team was late in the season. I guess the Skins are all set player wise and don't need anything more then Bradford.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 12:09 PM   #965
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
If the Rams draft RGIII they are essentially 'giving up' on Bradford.
There is no way the asking price for a passed over QB is gonna be anywhere near 2 first round picks.
It's not really the traditional "giving up" situation when there are entirely new decision makers in place and they are in position to get the #2 QB in the current draft. All it's saying is that they prefer RG3 and picks over Bradford. if we get Bradford we are in the game...regardless of the cost.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 12:29 PM   #966
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Well, Shefter just said when Manning is released, the Redskins will have "all their eggs in the Peyton Manning basket" and WILL pursue him. Apparently also looking at Matt Flynn and Kyle Orton, as well as possibly moving up to #2 in the draft.

SmootSmack?
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 12:50 PM   #967
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
It's not really the traditional "giving up" situation when there are entirely new decision makers in place and they are in position to get the #2 QB in the current draft. All it's saying is that they prefer RG3 and picks over Bradford. if we get Bradford we are in the game...regardless of the cost.
Teams don't ditch a potential franchise QB because they 'prefer' another QB.

When a franchise makes the decision that they 'prefer' another QB they are telling everyone that they don't believe the QB the had could become a franchise QB.
That is the ultimate de-valution.

You can label it however you like.
But if the Rams draft RGIII it is what it is.

All this is moot though, because I don't think the Rams are gonna draft RGIII.
And if they do I would be more then happy for the Allen/Shanahan to steal Bradford from them on the cheap.
30gut is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 12:55 PM   #968
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Teams don't ditch a potential franchise QB because they 'prefer' another QB.

When a franchise makes the decision that they 'prefer' another QB they are telling everyone that they don't believe the QB the had could become a franchise QB.
That is the ultimate de-valution.

You can label it however you like.
But if the Rams draft RGIII it is what it is.

All this is moot though, because I don't think the Rams are gonna draft RGIII.
And if they do I would be more then happy for the Allen/Shanahan to steal Bradford from them on the cheap.
I agree with one notable exception: if they select RG3 with the intent to trade him to the highest bidder. Then it doesn't say anything about Bradford.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 01:41 PM   #969
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Well, Shefter just said when Manning is released, the Redskins will have "all their eggs in the Peyton Manning basket" and WILL pursue him. Apparently also looking at Matt Flynn and Kyle Orton, as well as possibly moving up to #2 in the draft.

SmootSmack?
Me? No, I've already told teams I'm only signing with the Ravens or Jets
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 01:43 PM   #970
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

lol nice SS
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 01:45 PM   #971
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Well at least we have good idea of where you are going to be playing next year
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 01:57 PM   #972
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Tweet by Eskin:

Howard Eskin@howardeskinReply
Retweet

Favorite
· Open

Told by 2 people close to Mannings that Peyton very likely to be a Redskin despite smokescreen being put of their by Skins to seek other QBs
redsk1 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 01:59 PM   #973
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Signing Payton Manning if healthy give us a top 5 Qb and doesn't cost us any draft picks. If we do get Payton we will trade down and Id assume pick up Mike Adams and Michael Floyd or a quality corner. The emphasis will be on the offense this year.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 02:06 PM   #974
tc2deuce
Special Teams
 
tc2deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 363
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

we will regret not getting RGIII
tc2deuce is offline  
Old 02-05-2012, 02:09 PM   #975
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,515
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by tc2deuce View Post
we will regret not getting RGIII
Heard the same thing in regards to Jimmy Clausen.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40074 seconds with 10 queries