Media Bias

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Social media influence is undeniable in forwarding this collapse of viable, honest news media.

Last week CNN wrote this about the Atlanta shootings as a headline article, front page

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/18/polit...ans/index.html

First sentence of the article:

it's immaterial whether the accused killer in the Atlanta spa shootings admits to a racist motivation. Asian Americans, already traumatized by a rising tide of hate, violence and rhetoric, have been living in fear for months

They are openingly saying “the facts don’t matter” here is the narrative you must believe.

This was written as the facts started to unravel in a USA Today article which interviewed people in his group home stating the guy had a sex addiction so terrible he was in group home therapy. They couldn’t find anyone to say he was a racist...social media post aside from a single China Virus” post didn’t give us insight to a character other than he was deeply religious.

If we actually look at crime stats acts of violence against Asians...and just other recent events...the white supremacy argument folds quickly.


It’s what’s exactly is happening today with the Boulder shooting...yesterday the narrative was “another white guy mass shooting”...today it “we need gun control”

What changed? We found out the shooters name. Bigoted statements on social media are being erased included those from meena Harris and daily show about evil whitey.

[SunnySide]

Fox News is burying the sexual misconduct scandals re republicans Gaetz and Cawthorn.

I personally dont care at all that left leaning media leans left and right leaning media leans right.

I do think its odd that people get all up in arms and wave their "media is the enemy" flag though when this happens.

[Chico23231]

Tucker and fox was the first network to have it last night and with the interview everyone is referring to today

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Tucker and fox was the first network to have it last night and with the interview everyone is referring to today

youre right, just watched it. i was wrong

weird interview

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

youre right, just watched it. i was wrong

weird interview

given the two weirdos involved with the interview yeah makes sense

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

given the two weirdos involved with the interview yeah makes sense

MTK...Tucker is a good dude. His time at CNN back when they were an honest news outlet and MSNBC were good. Well liked guy...good guy.

Give it a chance

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

MTK...Tucker is a piece of shit. His time at CNN back when he was only a half a piece of shit was pretty good. Well liked guy by other racist pieces of shit.



Give it a chance

There we go. That’s better.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

MTK...Tucker is a good dude. His time at CNN back when they were an honest news outlet and MSNBC were good. Well liked guy...good guy.

Give it a chance

Oh yeah? Ok I'll give him a chance

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

youre right, just watched it. i was wrong

weird interview

You watched the Tuck? Sunnyside, glad to have you aboard!

And if any laws broken, that dude should go to jail. Period

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

You watched the Tuck? Sunnyside, glad to have you aboard!

And if any laws broken, that dude should go to jail. Period

lol i watched the 8 min interview clip

After watching .. im guessing gaetz is saying there was no 17 year old girl .. but then later on, if there was it was legal

I 100% assumed the age of consent in Florida was 17 and he could get in trouble if he transferred a 17 year old across state lines and had sex.

But Florida, the age of consent is 18 so if he did have sex with a 17 year old, thats statutory rape. Romeo Juliet law allows some consideration if they are within 4 years of age.

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.co...-rape-laws.htm

Well see where it goes ... the whole his family is getting extorted by a DOJ agent thing is weird .. the DOJ agent he is accusing of isnt there anymore, doesnt have the ability to make this DOJ investigation go away and if your dad is wearing a wire, didnt you just make public the sting operation to prove the extortion?

Well see what happens ..

weird dude

the whole I have a son and I let him to go spring break thing is weird to .. he doesnt have a son, he has some 19 year old living at his house for some reason. This 19 year odl has a dad, he isnt named Matthew gaetz.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

lol i watched the 8 min interview clip

After watching .. im guessing gaetz is saying there was no 17 year old girl .. but then later on, if there was it was legal

I 100% assumed the age of consent in Florida was 17 and he could get in trouble if he transferred a 17 year old across state lines and had sex.

But Florida, the age of consent is 18 so if he did have sex with a 17 year old, thats statutory rape. Romeo Juliet law allows some consideration if they are within 4 years of age.

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.co...-rape-laws.htm

Well see where it goes ... the whole his family is getting extorted by a DOJ agent thing is weird .. the DOJ agent he is accusing of isnt there anymore, doesnt have the ability to make this DOJ investigation go away and if your dad is wearing a wire, didnt you just make public the sting operation to prove the extortion?

Well see what happens ..

weird dude

the whole I have a son and I let him to go spring break thing is weird to .. he doesnt have a son, he has some 19 year old living at his house for some reason. This 19 year odl has a dad, he isnt named Matthew gaetz.

I just watched this. Gaetz is going out of his way to try to throw Tucker under the bus with him. Very weird.

I liked Gaetz, but this interview, not because he's necessarily guilty of anything illegal, but just because of the typical trying to deflect, is off-putting at best and flat out wrong at worst. He's a perfect (and for Americans shitty) politician for DC.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Baltimore, the Siren Song won out tonight. Got off early for dog-sitting duties (my phone literally tried to auto correct to dogfighting). Which would be the best job ever if I could find a way to survive off of it (dog-sitting).

I knew I wouldn't make it too long.

But it's really not that racy:

When was the last time anyone here that constantly shits on Tucker has actually watched a full episode of his show? Not some clip presented on a democrat newscast with no context, an actual episode?

I've offered up the deal to watch someone a liberal likes here for a week if the same person would watch Tucker before, at least 3 times. Never 1 taker. Which is fine, if you have no desire to watch him. But if you refuse to watch him, but then also get to be the judge, jury, and executioner of how racist he is, seems a little weird.

So unless some liberals here magically started watching Tucker in their free time, what is this based off of?

I don't come in here shitting on Chris Cuomo or Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon all the time, because I don't watch them.

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Baltimore, the Siren Song won out tonight. Got off early for dog-sitting duties (my phone literally tried to auto correct to dogfighting). Which would be the best job ever if I could find a way to survive off of it (dog-sitting).

I knew I wouldn't make it too long.

But it's really not that racy:

When was the last time anyone here that constantly shits on Tucker has actually watched a full episode of his show? Not some clip presented on a democrat newscast with no context, an actual episode?

I've offered up the deal to watch someone a liberal likes here for a week if the same person would watch Tucker before, at least 3 times. Never 1 taker. Which is fine, if you have no desire to watch him. But if you refuse to watch him, but then also get to be the judge, jury, and executioner of how racist he is, seems a little weird.

So unless some liberals here magically started watching Tucker in their free time, what is this based off of?

I don't come in here shitting on Chris Cuomo or Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon all the time, because I don't watch them.

I don’t watch any of them. It’s all editorialized entertainment and not news.

I read articles. From the left, from the right, down the middle, here, Reddit etc

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

I don’t watch any of them. It’s all editorialized entertainment and not news.

I read articles. From the left, from the right, down the middle, here, Reddit etc

Reading is definitely the way to go if you're trying to learn something. The talking heads are more about reinforcing your own views. I need to read more think tanks from all sides. And just read more in general.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Baltimore, the Siren Song won out tonight. Got off early for dog-sitting duties (my phone literally tried to auto correct to dogfighting). Which would be the best job ever if I could find a way to survive off of it (dog-sitting).

I knew I wouldn't make it too long.

But it's really not that racy:

When was the last time anyone here that constantly shits on Tucker has actually watched a full episode of his show? Not some clip presented on a democrat newscast with no context, an actual episode?

I've offered up the deal to watch someone a liberal likes here for a week if the same person would watch Tucker before, at least 3 times. Never 1 taker. Which is fine, if you have no desire to watch him. But if you refuse to watch him, but then also get to be the judge, jury, and executioner of how racist he is, seems a little weird.

So unless some liberals here magically started watching Tucker in their free time, what is this based off of?

I don't come in here shitting on Chris Cuomo or Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon all the time, because I don't watch them.

I don't watch them either, so feel free to shit all over them in here.