Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Who is the better back, Portis or Betts?
Portis 71 83.53%
Betts 14 16.47%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2007, 12:44 PM   #91
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I do know that Betts is fresh, relatively healthy, and has no theoretical abuse issues. Sellers is the same way...but he can't block for himself.
Well Betts does have a long history of injuries. Does anyone remember that he almost got cut by Gibbs because he was always falling prey to some injury.

And let me reiterate that I really don't care who is playing in the backfield as long as we are running the ball effectively. I just think Portis is clearly the better option at this point. Hopefully, Buges will coach up the linemen and they will gel as the season continues and this whole issue will become a moot.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-30-2007, 12:46 PM   #92
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Well Betts does have a long history of injuries. Does anyone remember that he almost got cut by Gibbs because he was always falling prey to some injury.

And let me reiterate that I really don't care who is playing in the backfield as long as we are running the ball effectively. I just think Portis is clearly the better option at this point. Hopefully, Buges will coach up the linemen and they will gel as the season continues and this whole issue will become a moot.
Agreed.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 03:53 PM   #93
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgack View Post
What's wearing him down is the fact that he carried the ball almost 350 times a season for back-to-back seasons. As I've said a number of times, his ypc is way, way, WAY down since leaving Denver, in part because we're trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole by forcing him into an offense that isn't well-designed for his body or talents. He's making it work by compensating with quantity, and that is taking its toll on his body.

Again, this effect is well known in fantasy football circles, but this is a case where the fantasy impact does correlate back to the real game because it directly speaks to a RB's durability and career longevity.

Here's are some of the articles on the topic:

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Football analysis and NFL stats for the Moneyball era - Authors of Pro Football Prospectus 2007 (this one isn't bad)
David Yudkin - RB Production After Seasons With 400+ Touches (Including Regular & Postseason) (more FF oriented than "real" NFL based)
Pro-football-reference.com blog » Running Back Overuse and Injuries, Part One
Pro-football-reference.com blog » Running Back Overuse and Injuries, Part Two (Playoff Edition) (by far the best articles I've read on the phenomenon)
FootballDocs Fantasy Football - Effect of Running Back Carries on Future Production (this one is old but it's interesting to see how their predictions panned out)

Excellent post!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 01:32 AM   #94
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Yup Portis is washed up. He's just got more rushing yards than every back besides Adrian Peterson and Willie Parker.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 01:38 AM   #95
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Yup Portis is washed up. He's just got more rushing yards than every back besides Adrian Peterson and Willie Parker.
Wow. He sure does. That's awesome. Imagine if he wasn't banged up all offseason/preseason. With Peterson getting dinged today he has a chance for the rushing title if he stays healthy. (A loud, resounding knock on wood).
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 01:44 AM   #96
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Yup Portis is washed up. He's just got more rushing yards than every back besides Adrian Peterson and Willie Parker.
He's also one of 5 backs to be averaging more than 20 carries a game.

His now 4.2 yards a carry is more than acceptable to run with every game. If he can keep up this pace, we should keep feeding him.

If it falls off, we should go back to emphasizing the pass.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 02:40 AM   #97
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Yup Portis is washed up. He's just got more rushing yards than every back besides Adrian Peterson and Willie Parker.
He had a good game. That's two in a row now. But those were way overdue.

For some reason I didn't think it would take until Week 9 to see it.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 02:42 AM   #98
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
Impact Rookie
 
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 57
Posts: 890
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

portis did well today. Finally the last two weeks he done well, but the other 12 weeks he was shit.
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 02:45 AM   #99
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR View Post
portis did well today. Finally the last two weeks he done well, but the other 12 weeks he was shit.
12 weeks?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 02:51 AM   #100
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
Impact Rookie
 
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 57
Posts: 890
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

yes his first 100 hundred yard game last week was his first in the last 12 weeks that he played in against the jets
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 05:11 AM   #101
flashalexb
Camp Scrub
 
flashalexb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 95
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Portis. just took him half the season to get back into playing shape
flashalexb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:35 AM   #102
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

It's funny that 2 weeks ago Portis was "washed up," has been "worn down by injury," has "lost his vision," is "no better than a 3rd down back," etc. and now people are saying that he wasn't irredeemable. Eat your crow like a man and admit that you were wrong; Portis's career wasn't done like so many implied or expressly stated.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:37 AM   #103
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
It's funny that 2 weeks ago Portis was "washed up," has been "worn down by injury," has "lost his vision," is "no better than a 3rd down back," etc. and now people are saying that he wasn't irredeemable. Eat your crow like a man and admit that you were wrong; Portis's career wasn't done like so many implied or expressly stated.
He's rushed for 333 yards the last 2 games. Not bad for a 3rd down back.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 11:46 AM   #104
dgack
The Starter
 
dgack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
He's rushed for 333 yards the last 2 games. Not bad for a 3rd down back.
I know this isn't what you guys are specifically calling out, but to me this just proves one of my original theorems -- that prior to the last 2 games, we have been calling the wrong plays for an effective run game with the staff we have.

I think even CP was saying this a few weeks ago, that the playcalling has been anything but productive for him.

I also still think that we're leaning too hard on him and that's dangerous. As I said several posts ago, we are getting CP his yards through quantity -- he's carried a whopping 66 times in the past 2 games! When you consider the most heavily worked RB in the league -- Willie Parker -- gets 23.6 carries a game, I think we should all be a little concerned about CP seeing 30 and 36 carry games.

However, it appears that Ladell's penchant for coughing up the ball in key situations is still very much an issue, so certainly it's difficult to say right now he should be in there instead of Clinton. That said, Portis has the dubious honor of being tied for 8th on the NFC's fumbles leader list (ugh, J-Cam is first), so it's not as though Betts is alone in his woes here.

In any event, IMO, the important numbers of the past two games are the rushing average and the long runs. I hope these continue to climb while the actual number of carries fall, because we are still WAY down the charts on big rush plays and could be doing a lot better in yards per carry.
__________________
"To bring a Sherm Lewis in to a Jim Zorn and whoever his offensive coordinator is, it's like bringing in another man to help teach you how to make better love to your wife or something." -- Tre Johnson
dgack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 11:54 AM   #105
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
He's rushed for 333 yards the last 2 games. Not bad for a 3rd down back.
Betts lost a drive-killing fumble on his only run of the day. We were lucky McNabb gave it right back to us, but Ladell belongs on the bench when CP is healthy.

Makes this poll look pretty stupid.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.36292 seconds with 11 queries