![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
thanks 53. The point I was trying to make was we had a elite D in the making with him which would put a little less pressure on O. So FO was on the right track in some ways that we are not considering. He was a huge loss. Obviously
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
I don't know if we really have an "elite" D. Though this is probably more a matter of perception. My perception is that we were more of a very good D, who's numbers might have been better because our offense didn't really create a sense of urgency from our opponents.
To me though the elite D's this year belonged to the Titans, Steelers, and Ravens. Defenses that not only stopped people but destroyed them. Our D was more of a "stop you" kind of defense, which isn't exactly a bad thing, but it's obvious that we're not the type of team that can win 10 or 11 games with our D. We need at least a top 15 offense to supplement them, which is pretty good when you think about it, but teams like those I mentioned above were able to get over 10 wins with offenses ranked 21 (Ten), 22 (Pit), and 18 (Bal). We were 19th in total offense for anyone who wants to know. Side Note: 2,400th post FTW
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Damascus, MD
Posts: 354
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Just having Sean Taylor would have allowed our other bomb playmaker (Landry) to play his natural song safety position and blow some people up.
__________________
"No one runs on the Cowboys" - Wade Phillips Incorrect Wade...the Burgundy and Gold just ran all over you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
The friendship between Dan Snyder and Vinny Cerrato is sooooo overblown, VC was actually probably better friends with Gerald Snyder than with Cerrato.
And Snyder's "meddling" in team affairs is overblown as well, especially in relation to other owners' "meddling" with their teams. But ultimately it doesn't matter. Ultimately, VC just has to be removed from any football-related decision making. Not so much because of what he has and hasn't accomplished, but because fans just don't believe anything but what they decided to believe a long time ago. As for Sean Taylor, we miss him big time on the field! Big time! Not to mention the fact that were he alive we probably would have spent the picks on Moore and/or Horton elsewhere, perhaps the line.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Until we win a Superbowl the blame will always go right here. I am more pumped to win a SB because then I can tell all haters to shut it. I hope it happens sometime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Not necessarily...it would depend on who the GM was and how much respect he has around the league. But maybe I am not the right person to answer that because I don't believe that Dan meddles much on a day to day basis to begin with. I believe that he lets Vinny do his job for the most part...I just don't think he makes Vinny accountable in the same way he has made everyone else there accountable over the last 10 years. And the proof of that is that he's pretty much the only one still there from the start.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Quote:
I'd be fine with a change of regime with the caveat that it's a full changing of football operations with one voice, one philosophy and a organizational structure that we're committed to. Just adding Allen to the muddled mess we currently have is rather pointless.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
That's what I meant when I said our FO was on the right track in ways we are not considering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: RUMOR: Bruce Allen to Redskins?
Quote:
I do agree on the point that Snyders day to day meddling is most likely overblown.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|