Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn?

freddyg12 · 03-12-2009, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Gotta go with Daniels, he's the only potential starter on the list.

I like PD a lot, but I disagree. I went w/Kendall. there are injury questions w/Daniels & Randy Thomas, we don't know how their recovery from injuries will impact their play. Kendall could be a better option at RG than Thomas, he had a solid 08.

GTripp0012 · 03-12-2009, 12:01 PM

Pete Kendall is my answer. What a difference it would make for us if Kendall was our first lineman off the bench at either LG or C. It would allow Rinehart to refine his skills at one position (RG), giving him a greater chance at developing into a replacement for Thomas. It would allow us to keep Jansen as a RT (either as a backup or a starter). And it would give us more unit leadership for a unit where the only certainty is that it will be getting a lot younger really fast.

BigHairedAristocrat · 03-12-2009, 02:15 PM

Can Kendall even play center? I like Kendall and think he would do a fine job, but considering the age of our starting offensive line, id rather have most of our backups be young guys. Geisinger got abused at LT, but id like to give him a shot to be a backup C/G. There are some interesting OL prospects on our practice squad too. If we can resign kendall and not garauntee him anything, then fine - let him compete in camp with younger guys for a backup spot. If he vastly outperforms the young guys, then he's got a job. But if theres a younger guy even 80% as competent as Kendall, then i'd favor going with the younger guy. Our Practice squad was raided by other teams last year - we cant afford to let that keep happening. we've got to keep our promising, younger guys and if it means letting a slightly better veteran go to ensure the young guy doesnt get snatched off the practice squad, then thats the best long-term decision.

MTK · 03-12-2009, 02:39 PM

Yes, Kendall has played center in the NFL

53Fan · 03-12-2009, 04:31 PM

I voted for Daniels but the argument for Kendall is a very sound one. I almost voted for him and now I'm starting to think he would be the best choice. Hopefully we can sign them both.

The Goat · 03-12-2009, 05:15 PM

I voted for Daniels... if healthy he's a bad-ass run stopper, which explains why Denver and Tenn are interested in him. Hopefully the docs and training staff have a good handle on his recovery and how healthy he can be for us this year.

... I feel like if we address RT the way we should then Kendell is unnecessary. Jansen really shouldn't be a backup at tackle any longer.

CRedskinsRule · 03-12-2009, 05:30 PM

Has anybody heard any more information about this?

53Fan · 03-12-2009, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Has anybody heard any more information about this?

I have'nt heard anything since this came out. It's been eerily quiet.

Trample the Elderly · 03-12-2009, 09:12 PM

If we can get Daniels and Wynn in a package deal that cost the same amount as Daniels old contract then I say go for it. They can buy us time until our draft pick is up to speed and then you can cut them in the future without a loss and knowing that you've got someone waiting there. Right now with Evans and Taylor gone we need people. Will Buzbee be able to fill that hole? Will Jackson. If they can prove that in camp then no don't sign them. If they can't, well we've got a two for.

mrreddman · 03-12-2009, 09:16 PM

KENDALL hands down. He's a great backup and he would allow us more flexibility in the draft and the rest of free agency. We would then only really need a RT on offense, where, as of now we still need 2 lineman. Of course we still would need a DE and SLB. Hopefully we can trade down in the draft and address the remaining 3 needs with our first 3 picks. Even though im still down for signing Crowell and drafting a LB in the 3rd. I like Daniels too but his injury factor makes me pick Kendall. I dont want Wynn if he played for FREE! He brings NOTHING to this team . Hence...the Giants cut him and signed TWO lineman to an already stacked DL. And who the heck is Epstein? Does he come with Horseshack and Boom Boom Washington too?

mrreddman · 03-12-2009, 09:22 PM

Of those guys..Kendall hands down! Daniels is coming off a major injury although id still like to have him too as a rotational guy. I just rather have Kendall more as he is still a very descent starter and a great backup who already knows the system. Wynn just absolutely sucks!..Hell no..why do you think the Giants cut him and signed TWO lineman to an already stacked DL? And who the hell is Epstein? Does he come with Horseshack and Boom Boom Washington too?

The Goat · 03-12-2009, 10:17 PM

LOL... looks like both your personalities choose Kendall mrreddman

mrreddman · 03-12-2009, 11:15 PM

sorry that was an accident, thought the first one didnt post. but i guess ya get the point...... WYNN SUCKS. I like Kendall..Daniels is ok at this point but Canty woulda been ideal. Epstein?.....uh no

CRedskinsRule · 03-13-2009, 07:52 AM

What about Juan for Vinny's job, that guy could come up with ANYTHING (for a price)

MTK · 03-13-2009, 08:58 AM

Negative points for the newb.

View Poll Results: Which Over 30 Veteran Should We Re-Sign?
Phillip Daniels	88	44.44%
Pete Kendall	62	31.31%
Juan Epstein	13	6.57%
Renaldo Wynn	5	2.53%
None of the Above	30	15.15%
Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll

03-12-2009, 12:01 PM	#92
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 36 Posts: 15,994	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Pete Kendall is my answer. What a difference it would make for us if Kendall was our first lineman off the bench at either LG or C. It would allow Rinehart to refine his skills at one position (RG), giving him a greater chance at developing into a replacement for Thomas. It would allow us to keep Jansen as a RT (either as a backup or a starter). And it would give us more unit leadership for a unit where the only certainty is that it will be getting a lot younger really fast. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

03-12-2009, 02:15 PM	#93
BigHairedAristocrat Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,712	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Can Kendall even play center? I like Kendall and think he would do a fine job, but considering the age of our starting offensive line, id rather have most of our backups be young guys. Geisinger got abused at LT, but id like to give him a shot to be a backup C/G. There are some interesting OL prospects on our practice squad too. If we can resign kendall and not garauntee him anything, then fine - let him compete in camp with younger guys for a backup spot. If he vastly outperforms the young guys, then he's got a job. But if theres a younger guy even 80% as competent as Kendall, then i'd favor going with the younger guy. Our Practice squad was raided by other teams last year - we cant afford to let that keep happening. we've got to keep our promising, younger guys and if it means letting a slightly better veteran go to ensure the young guy doesnt get snatched off the practice squad, then thats the best long-term decision. __________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.

03-12-2009, 02:39 PM	#94
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,568	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Yes, Kendall has played center in the NFL __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-12-2009, 04:31 PM	#95
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? I voted for Daniels but the argument for Kendall is a very sound one. I almost voted for him and now I'm starting to think he would be the best choice. Hopefully we can sign them both. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-12-2009, 05:15 PM	#96
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? I voted for Daniels... if healthy he's a bad-ass run stopper, which explains why Denver and Tenn are interested in him. Hopefully the docs and training staff have a good handle on his recovery and how healthy he can be for us this year. ... I feel like if we address RT the way we should then Kendell is unnecessary. Jansen really shouldn't be a backup at tackle any longer. __________________ 24-34

03-12-2009, 05:30 PM	#97
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 57 Posts: 21,451	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Has anybody heard any more information about this?

03-12-2009, 09:12 PM	#99
Trample the Elderly Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 47 Posts: 2,906	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? If we can get Daniels and Wynn in a package deal that cost the same amount as Daniels old contract then I say go for it. They can buy us time until our draft pick is up to speed and then you can cut them in the future without a loss and knowing that you've got someone waiting there. Right now with Evans and Taylor gone we need people. Will Buzbee be able to fill that hole? Will Jackson. If they can prove that in camp then no don't sign them. If they can't, well we've got a two for.

03-12-2009, 09:16 PM	#100
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? KENDALL hands down. He's a great backup and he would allow us more flexibility in the draft and the rest of free agency. We would then only really need a RT on offense, where, as of now we still need 2 lineman. Of course we still would need a DE and SLB. Hopefully we can trade down in the draft and address the remaining 3 needs with our first 3 picks. Even though im still down for signing Crowell and drafting a LB in the 3rd. I like Daniels too but his injury factor makes me pick Kendall. I dont want Wynn if he played for FREE! He brings NOTHING to this team . Hence...the Giants cut him and signed TWO lineman to an already stacked DL. And who the heck is Epstein? Does he come with Horseshack and Boom Boom Washington too?

03-12-2009, 09:22 PM	#101
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Of those guys..Kendall hands down! Daniels is coming off a major injury although id still like to have him too as a rotational guy. I just rather have Kendall more as he is still a very descent starter and a great backup who already knows the system. Wynn just absolutely sucks!..Hell no..why do you think the Giants cut him and signed TWO lineman to an already stacked DL? And who the hell is Epstein? Does he come with Horseshack and Boom Boom Washington too?

03-12-2009, 10:17 PM	#102
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? LOL... looks like both your personalities choose Kendall mrreddman __________________ 24-34

03-12-2009, 11:15 PM	#103
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? sorry that was an accident, thought the first one didnt post. but i guess ya get the point...... WYNN SUCKS. I like Kendall..Daniels is ok at this point but Canty woulda been ideal. Epstein?.....uh no

03-13-2009, 07:52 AM	#104
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 57 Posts: 21,451	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? What about Juan for Vinny's job, that guy could come up with ANYTHING (for a price)

03-13-2009, 08:58 AM	#105
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,568	Re: Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn? Negative points for the newb. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn?

Locker Room Main Forum