Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2009, 10:07 PM   #91
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Well if you're always beating yourself and you're not prepared then what does that make you? I don't think we're bad, we're just average. I think we're well coached on defense. I think we're poorly coached on offense.
Please defend this claim. I'll take just one example.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-20-2009, 10:09 PM   #92
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Please defend this claim. I'll take just one example.
I never see blown coverages, guys seem to be in position. We don't give up a lot of big plays.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:10 PM   #93
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I never see blown coverages, guys seem to be in position. We don't give up a lot of big plays.
I could be wrong, but I think today our CBs were not playing well and were giving the Rams WRs a lot of room.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:10 PM   #94
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I never see blown coverages, guys seem to be in position. We don't give up a lot of big plays.
Fair enough.

Couldn't you say exactly the same thing about our offense, that we never take obscenely negative plays on offense, we just sometimes end up in third and long thanks to uninspired first and second down play?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:12 PM   #95
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I could be wrong, but I think today our CBs were not playing well and were giving the Rams WRs a lot of room.
That's true, the DB's didn't play all that well today. But I didn't see guys blowing coverages. STL scored 7 points so in two weeks the defense has given up 23?
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:14 PM   #96
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

I think I said this already, but I thought Blache called a solid game. He seems to do well against offenses built around a single player.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:15 PM   #97
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

I think he misused Rogers against Laurent Robinson, but that seems to be more of a complete personnel issue. Last year, you could have gone with Rogers against Avery, and Springs against Robinson. This year, Robinson is just a mismatch for whoever we have on him.

Big and physical receivers are going to own us all year. That's not Blache's fault, we just constructed the secondary poorly in the offseason.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:16 PM   #98
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Fair enough.

Couldn't you say exactly the same thing about our offense, that we never take obscenely negative plays on offense, we just sometimes end up in third and long thanks to uninspired first and second down play?
Well yes there aren't a lot of neagative plays cause the offense is conservative. But that doesn't mean we're not poorly coached on offense.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:17 PM   #99
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think he misused Rogers against Laurent Robinson, but that seems to be more of a complete personnel issue. Last year, you could have gone with Rogers against Avery, and Springs against Robinson. This year, Robinson is just a mismatch for whoever we have on him.

Big and physical receivers are going to own us all year. That's not Blache's fault, we just constructed the secondary poorly in the offseason.


What would you have done? Kept Springs?
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:20 PM   #100
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Well yes there aren't a lot of neagative plays cause the offense is conservative. But that doesn't mean we're not poorly coached on offense.
Well I agree with that, but doesn't that make the defense just as conservative? I know we blitz a lot, but if you just play the same boring coverage scheme, how aggressive are you really being?

If the argument is that the Skins D is well coached because they don't blow many assignments, and the offense also hardly blows any assignments, I'd say that, in this example at least, the units are equally disciplined.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:23 PM   #101
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
[/b]

What would you have done? Kept Springs?
Not necessarily. I would have driven a harder bargain with Hall, cut Smoot, used the leverage in the FA market to the best of my ability, would have extended Rogers at the price of the Hall contract, and would have made sure that at least one player that I brought in could match-up with bigger receivers. I know the NFC East went a lot smaller at WR this offseason, but the Giants didn't have much trouble throwing on Hall at all.

If Springs had fit in, I wouldn't have been against keeping him, but he was kind of a non-essential part of the plan, at least until we didn't really replace him.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:30 PM   #102
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
Special Teams
 
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queens Village, NY
Age: 44
Posts: 349
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

I'm officially waiting on Mike Shanahan to come on in and fix this offense right away. He will completely change this offense into a scoring machine. I thought Zorn would be alright but he does not have a clue. It just make me wonder if Campbell is the problem with the offense. Maybe Campbell is not showing that he knows the playbook good enough to call certain plays. Just a guess! We have too much talent on both sides of the ball to be mediocre. We need to start a petition to get rid of Zorn and Blache. If I see our cornersback play 10 yards again on a 3rd and 5 again I will completely lose it.

Last edited by Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor; 09-20-2009 at 10:31 PM. Reason: Correction
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:35 PM   #103
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I'd also examine Santana Moss a little bit... Whats up with him? He basically hasn't done anything in 2 weeks. And when he did have a chance to do something, he fumbled the ball like a dope.

What's with him? I mean is he even #1 calibur anymore? Sure doesn't look like it to me..
Yeah, I found myself asking the same thing today -- where the hell is Santana Moss? What, now the Rams are shutting him down?

Maybe he'll show up against the Lions....
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:35 PM   #104
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think he misused Rogers against Laurent Robinson, but that seems to be more of a complete personnel issue. Last year, you could have gone with Rogers against Avery, and Springs against Robinson. This year, Robinson is just a mismatch for whoever we have on him.

Big and physical receivers are going to own us all year. That's not Blache's fault, we just constructed the secondary poorly in the offseason.
Well said. Big WRs take our DBs to school. Our big WRs get schooled by every DB they face. It's very Alice in Wonderlandish.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:36 PM   #105
JPPT1974
Special Teams
 
JPPT1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 476
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Rams)

No wonder his last name is Smoot, because of smooting them down!
__________________
Happy New Year 2025 and January Jumping!
JPPT1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.67798 seconds with 10 queries