Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


RGIII Named Starter

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2012, 12:04 PM   #91
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Mike Shannahan is putting his whole future on RGIII by naming him the starter. Once the draft trade went down the way it did in March he knew this was the way it was going to be. Either they both succeed together or Mike will be gone for failing to win with another QB. Somehow I think this time it will work.
scowan is offline  

Advertisements
Old 05-07-2012, 12:13 PM   #92
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,748
Re: RGIII Named Starter

I'm not surprised by RGIII being the starter, but I am surprised that Shanahan has named him the starter before any OTAs or training camp.

If you are going to go out, might as well do it in a blaze of glory.....or a giant big billow of smoke depending on the outcome.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:16 PM   #93
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,748
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by scowan View Post
Mike Shannahan is putting his whole future on RGIII by naming him the starter.

Well truthfully, he put his future on RGIII the moment that trade was solidified. I guess he sees no harm in naming the dude the starter at this particular time.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:20 PM   #94
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Re: RGIII Named Starter

looks like Grossman will not be inducted into the PF HOF after all ..... maybe 20 yrs from now RG3 will
budw38 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:25 PM   #95
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
Well truthfully, he put his future on RGIII the moment that trade was solidified. I guess he sees no harm in naming the dude the starter at this particular time.
Exactly! I think it was a great move for Shanahan to remove any and all doubt from the get go. It sends a message to RGIII that the coaches are 100% behind him and believe in him. I mean, even if the 'skins go 5-11, I'd much rather see them go 5-11 because RGIII is working out the "kinks" rather than seeing Grossman on the field do his Grossman thing.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:32 PM   #96
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
I'm not surprised by RGIII being the starter, but I am surprised that Shanahan has named him the starter before any OTAs or training camp.

If you are going to go out, might as well do it in a blaze of glory.....or a giant big billow of smoke depending on the outcome.
I think he saw the ridiculous kirk cousins' media hoopla and decided to put it to rest. If this keep going on into camp and preseason (and if cousins looked OK) the media would've gotten way out of hand.

And like others said, this "decision" was made when they drafted rg3.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:38 PM   #97
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Did they really have to announce this and did anyone ever think Rex would start?
firstdown is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:39 PM   #98
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Well it's not like Shanahan came out and declared him the starter. He was asked so he answered. No sense in making any drama out of it.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:52 PM   #99
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Actually the more interesting story will be who starts as the #2 guy. I mean, I think we all pretty much feel Grossman would be the backup, but I think Cousins might be good enough to beat Rex out of that spot. I'd say by next year, Cousins would have the #2 spot wrapped up.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:17 PM   #100
fanarchist
Special Teams
 
fanarchist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Re: RGIII Named Starter

I've read through this entire thread, and no one has addressed Mike implying 3 times, which should cause ones mind to gravitate toward the inference, that we could be employing some incarnation of the option. You're falling off.
fanarchist is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:21 PM   #101
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Well it was mentioned in another thread...where it probably didn't belong.

"You're falling off" What do you mean by that?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:23 PM   #102
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanarchist View Post
I've read through this entire thread, and no one has addressed Mike implying 3 times, which should cause ones mind to gravitate toward the inference, that we could be employing some incarnation of the option. You're falling off.
Oh yeah? Well I haven't read through this thread, mainly because I don't give a shit who Mike calls the starter. If this is what qualifies as "news" nowadays it's no wonder newspapers are going out of business.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:41 PM   #103
SkinItup
Special Teams
 
SkinItup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 155
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Reason number... let's say 212 why we all like Griffin.

"Running the plays was another matter. It’s different when you know what routes you have on a certain play but you’ve got to know where to go with the ball during certain coverage. That’s the biggest thing when it comes to playing quarterback in the NFL.”

He know the right questions to ask himself to improve.
SkinItup is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:59 PM   #104
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Shanny might say that he doesn't pay attention to the press & public reaction, and maybe he doesen't, but naming RGIII the starter so early seems in part designed to avoid any talk of qb controversy.
IMO MS knows RG3's shoulders can handle the weight, MS likes/loves how he carries himself.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 02:01 PM   #105
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Should also be noted that it's 1st team offense vs. 2nd team defense, and 2nd team offense vs. 1st team defense
Yeah, I hope are #2 defense is not that much of a drop of from our #1 defense, same for the offense.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.83062 seconds with 10 queries