Breaking News on team name

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

That site is part of the NFL network. No surprise or coincidence there. It's an absolute joke.

Nope, that's the Redskins website, which is owned by the team.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

time for rich white elitists to move on to something else. The people who love and appreciate freedom won this one.

I agree, unfortunately they'll just move on to some other fake cause that'll piss me off just as much.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Nope, that's the Redskins website, which is owned by the team.

I'd have to look into that. I'd have to believe the league has a say as to what goes on teams official sites. Otherwise, whoever runs the site is just an idiot. This issue is probably one of the nearest and dearest to a lot of Skins fans. Makes no sense to just act like the ruling didn't happen.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

I'd have to look into that. I'd have to believe the league has a say as to what goes on teams official sites. Otherwise, whoever runs the site is just an idiot. This issue is probably one of the nearest and dearest to a lot of Skins fans. Makes no sense to just act like the ruling didn't happen.

Here you go: Redskins.com | Privacy Policy

Don't see anything here about the site being operated by the NFL.

[insane4theskinsi]

mike asshole wise was on espn talking was on espn yesterday and this am talking crap about the redskins and how awful and vuglar we are for not calling for the name to change.only meaningful thing he has done in his life is say bad things about the redskins.

[JoeRedskin]

The Supreme Court's ruling was a huge win for free speech. From the decision:

“A bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.” Matal v. Tam, No. 15-1293, 2017 WL 2621315, at *5 (U.S. June 19, 2017).

The Justices were 8-0 on this. Ginsburg, Sotomayer and the others on the justices on the left reaffirmed this fundamental principle of democracy. Big blow to tyrannical SJW's and thought police everywhere.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by insane4theskinsi

mike asshole wise was on espn talking was on espn yesterday talking crap about the redskins and how awful and vuglar we are for not calling for the name to change.

He is entitled to his offensive opinion and may freely state it - hell, according to the Supreme Court, he can even trademark it.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Here you go: Redskins.com | Privacy Policy

Don't see anything here about the site being operated by the NFL.

If you're right, and it looks like you are, why would the site not cover this story? It makes no sense to me whatsoever. That decison was a big deal for the team and the country in general.

[sandtrapjack]

The NFL is going to give this a wide berth and go all out to avoid dipping their toes in that pond. They are keeping out of this court of public opinion (for once) and letting Washington fight the battle.

I believe if the NFL really wanted to force any suggestion for a name change 'for the collective good of the league' there are avenues they could have taken already. Like not selling the merchandise in the NFL store, removing link references to the team website etc etc etc.

The silence of the NFL on this really speaks volumes of their indifference to the whole thing.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

If you're right, and it looks like you are, why would the site not cover this story? It makes no sense to me whatsoever. That decison was a big deal for the team and the country in general.

I would imagine that the team wants this to become a non-issue, which at this point it is very likely to happen. Best way to make it a non-issue is to not talk about it. Although Snyder did put in a statement about the ruling if I am not mistaken.

[sdskinsfan2001]

If mike wise is on your computer or phone or tv, make it so he isnt. Out of site out of mind. Hes on my Peter King level of full avoidance.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I would imagine that the team wants this to become a non-issue, which at this point it is very likely to happen. Best way to make it a non-issue is to not talk about it. Although Snyder did put in a statement about the ruling if I am not mistaken.

Snyder has talked publicly about it for years which makes it even more weird its not on the team site. Oh well, I'll take the decision and reading about it somewhere else.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

He is entitled to his offensive opinion and may freely state it - hell, according to the Supreme Court, he can even trademark it.

hilarity...


Mike Wise...very tired act.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The Supreme Court's ruling was a huge win for free speech. From the decision:

“A bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.” Matal v. Tam, No. 15-1293, 2017 WL 2621315, at *5 (U.S. June 19, 2017).

The Justices were 8-0 on this. Ginsburg, Sotomayer and the others on the justices on the left reaffirmed this fundamental principle of democracy. Big blow to tyrannical SJW's and thought police everywhere.

It was nice to see the court in total agreement on this. It takes the whole political aspect of it and throws it right out the window,at least in my opinion.

[Alvin Walton]

Political correctness just ate a big bowl of dicks.