![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Whether Campbell was the better choice than the other two guys mentioned here for 2009 and whether he was the better choice for for 2009 and beyond are two different things.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I do believe for 2009 alone, he was far better than a turn-over prone rookie or an interception machine with a short temper though. If either of the other two were in burgundy and gold, the results would have been far worse than Campbell's salvaging of the broken offense. Sanchez would've hit IR at about Week 10 and Cutler would have thrown at least 35 picks without Forte and his college buddy to throw to.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
For the future, obviously the jury is out on Sanchez. He's promising but still needs a lot of seasoning.
Cutler really needs to get the INTs under control for him to take a step forward. If he continues on like this he's going to be a coach killer for sure. JC obviously has plenty of room for improvement. That said, as we know the situation around him this year was less than ideal and he still put up numbers better than half the starters in this league. I'm looking forward to seeing what Shanahan can do for him, assuming JC is brought back of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
best way to judge, gtripp do you think the redskins could get what the bears got in a trade? i highly doubt it
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|