|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-28-2006, 02:32 PM | #106 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 209
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
I can't believe this discussion is still going on. Nobody on here is saying Mark Brunell is the premiere QB in the NFL, but this is a guy who 3/4 through the season was at the top of the list of candidates for Comeback Player of the Year before getting injured. Now I'm sorry, but you don't get that sort of recognition simply because your a "component of a system", and to say that player is "bad" is just ignorant.
Would I like to see a little better production from our QB position? Of course. Does a part of me hope the QB position is an open competition so JC can light it up & be our starter? Absolutely. Is Mark Brunell a "Bad" QB? No way in hell.
__________________
<PeterGriffinVoice> Lotta Honky's In Here... </PeterGriffinVoice> |
Advertisements |
02-28-2006, 02:58 PM | #107 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
Gibbs brought Brunell in to run the offense and to teach the younger qbs how to manage the offense and how to be good leaders. Gibbs also brought Brunell in, because he felt Mark gave us a chance to be successful, and so far, Gibbs has been absolutely right. Mark will, again, be our starter on opening day this season. He may or may not finish as our starting quarterback, but there is no reason to make a change now.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
02-28-2006, 03:19 PM | #108 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Ugggg, I've entered a time warp to last September. Maybe we should debate in 9 separate threads whether it was wise to let go of Stephen Davis. This topic is as tired as the elastic on J.Lo.'s panties.
|
02-28-2006, 03:29 PM | #109 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Yeah and 50/50 is going to be our premier receiver this year!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
02-28-2006, 03:55 PM | #110 | |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
Can't believe I got sucked into this thread. |
|
02-28-2006, 03:57 PM | #111 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2006, 04:22 PM | #112 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
it musst be offseason, i think we're done now :P
besides, we have more important things to worry about, like... should we bring in TO, OR should with bring in TO, randy Moss, Meshawn and the defense from the 85 bears? I hear they're only asking for a 7th round pick. |
02-28-2006, 04:34 PM | #113 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 36
Posts: 161
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD...we all beat it to DEATH! this is really how u know its the offseason
__________________
"meet sean taylor" |
02-28-2006, 04:37 PM | #114 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
gladly
|
|
|