![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.
I pray you're right.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Not sure about Armstrong more close in breaking out than DT. I know it is one game, but so far, he doesn't look like he is going anywhere. I am thinking WR will be a top priority in the draft or the next FA signing period, or both. I love our TE's but you can't always target them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
He got in briefly on a couple of plays, got a penalty for holding and I didn't see much of him after that.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oneida N.Y
Posts: 138
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Joey Galloway will be benched and or cut by week 4. How he is staring is crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,234
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
after watching TJ play last night, I say that was a whiff on Bruce and company not signing that guy. Pisses me off!
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Once the Ravens came into the picture there wasn't much we could do. TJ was already being paid and compared to the Skins the Ravens were a much more viable competitor.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Once the Ravens came into the picture there wasn't much we could do. TJ was already being paid and compared to the Skins the Ravens were a much more viable competitor.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
At this stage of his career TJ was also looking for the best opportunity to perhaps win a super bowl. Consumed with the feeling the Ravens situation offered him a better chance at accomplishing that goal, his choice was easy.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
What did TJ do last night? 1 catch? Yeah I know he just signed there, just saying.
Boldin was the one that impressed me. He's a beast, wish we could have landed him somehow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,234
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
I guess he did only have one catch, he seemed open quit a bit to me. IDK I am just frustrated with our group of WR's.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
He got that pass interference call in the end zone that resulted in the TD. It was a weak call but it counted.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,234
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
IMO as good as a catch; just like Rak's holding plenty. If your talent is good enough to draw penalty and it helps move the ball or allows your team to win that is talent and a accommodate in this NFL (sadly).
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|