|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-05-2013, 03:13 PM | #106 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,420
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
Also, it dawned on me that you have the wrong chart displayed. This is a chart displaying ALL the spending (fed/state/local) and not just federal. The real chart is here. US Fed Spending Pie Chart for 2013 - Charts Military spending 24% compared to Welfare's 11% and 23% in pensions. Here are the actual numbers. US Federal Budget FY13 Estimated Spending Breakdown - Pie Chart
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
Advertisements |
03-05-2013, 04:52 PM | #107 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
|
|
03-05-2013, 07:10 PM | #108 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,428
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
samples base tax return(italics not changeable): Def:24% Hlthcare:22% Welfare:12% Education:4% Pensions:22% Interest:6% Other:10% allowing +/- 5% for a person's discretion: NC Skins Def: 19 Hlth:24 Welfare 14 Ed: 5 Other:10 P&I 28 AW Def 29 Hlth:20 Welfare 9 ed 4 other 10 P&I 28 FD Def 29 Hlth:22 Welfare 7 Ed 4 other 10 P&I 28 Mine Def 22 Hlth 22 Welfare 12 Ed 6 other 10 P&I 28 Obviously this is purely a simplistic example, but it wouldn't be any harder to implement then the rest of the boondoggle that is the US tax code (enter slinging sammy with fair tax discussion) |
|
03-05-2013, 07:56 PM | #109 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,420
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
Not sure why you think I want welfare raised. I don't. I'm just sick and tired of hearing how the welfare (aka..food stamps) is killing this country, when in fact, it plays very little in the grand scheme of things. I'm willing to bet you right now, if I were to do a poll with every single conservative friend I have, I bet you that the majority of them would list Welfare is the #1 issue. Also, when it comes down to it, I'd rather feed somebody than bomb them. If anything, our citizens are too stupid and I'd rather spend that money on education. Def 15 Hlth 25 Welfare 12 Ed 10 other: 10 P&I 28 Things I would increase: NASA - increase by 3 billion Things I would end: Oil subsidies: (account for 4-5 billion each year) Farm subsidies: (in most cases) save about 5 billion a year I know slashing the military that much seems drastic, but I'm in favor of pulling all of our bases and bring back our men/women to defend our own country. We don't need to be world police, and should intervene if people ask us to. We don't need brand new air craft carriers at this point, we don't any new jets at this point. We can use these guys to fortify our borders. Even slashing it to 15% would still have us spending way more than anybody else in the world. Including China, who currently has the largest army in the world.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty Last edited by NC_Skins; 03-05-2013 at 09:30 PM. |
|
03-05-2013, 09:09 PM | #110 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,428
|
Quote:
its weird that I can agree with slashing defense yet disagree about how. I do agree about bringing nearly all troops back, and putting leading tech projects on hold, but I would absolutely maintain airforce and navy forces and train for defense of vital airways and sealanes. I also find your increasing NASA interesting. |
|
03-05-2013, 09:46 PM | #111 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
There's plenty of money that could be shifted from military to NASA (military and non-military uses).
|
03-05-2013, 10:48 PM | #112 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2013, 06:58 PM | #113 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Right before the sequester happend i heard a guy on a the radio say something really funny. He said, if your family needs to cut a few percent from their budget you would cut out dinning, or a cable package, or even a cell phone plan. Obama on the other hand is selling this as you should stop feeding the baby and putting gas in your car.
Meanwhile, since things arnt going nearly as bad as Obama had scared us into believing they would: Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised - Washington Times GOP Congressman Makes CDC Director Squirm After Confronting Him on Children’s Vaccine Cuts: ‘Let Me Get This Straight…’ | Video | TheBlaze.com Quote:
__________________
|
|
03-08-2013, 12:42 PM | #114 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
|
|
03-08-2013, 12:49 PM | #115 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
This President will do anything to get his way even if it means running this country into the ground. The Dems are also playing the race card. Democrats pull out race card in sequester game - Washington Times Last edited by firstdown; 03-08-2013 at 01:32 PM. |
|
03-11-2013, 12:58 PM | #116 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
I probably just made a big mistake telling the lady at the IRS that I hope her job is done away with because of Sequestraqtion. I could tell from the minute she answered the phone after I held fo 15 min she had that attitude thing going. I got hit with a $329.60 penalty for paying my taxes one day late (talk about excessive). They were actually paid on the due date but was processed the following day. She shrugged it off as no big deal, would not answer my question about it being excessive, and then when I ask she said "what do you want me to do about it". Thats when I got pissed but I probably should have waited until I protested the fine.
Last edited by firstdown; 03-11-2013 at 01:04 PM. |
03-11-2013, 03:02 PM | #117 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,987
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
The Washington Times,really?
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
03-11-2013, 05:05 PM | #118 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Whats really sad is that the economic policies of Democrat seem to have the largest impact of negitively affecting the majority of minorities.
Here is a great documentry about the Democratic Plantation: Runaway Slave - DVD Available Now Runaway Slave Movie - Own it on DVD! - YouTube
__________________
|
03-11-2013, 05:10 PM | #119 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
__________________
|
03-11-2013, 05:27 PM | #120 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
|
|
|
|