Pro-gun article

RedskinRat · 04-23-2013, 05:14 PM

GiantOne, quit while you're behind.

RedskinRat · 04-23-2013, 05:49 PM

From Feistein's bill:

All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least
one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to
accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or
semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.

Any gun owners find this as worrying as I do?

I have at least two of those features on every semi-auto pistol I've owned.

Alvin Walton · 04-23-2013, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

From Feistein's bill:

All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least
one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to
accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or
semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.

Any gun owners find this as worrying as I do?

I have at least two of those features on every semi-auto pistol I've owned.

Shes a blatant gungrabber.
I hope she gets a bad yeast infection.

firstdown · 04-23-2013, 06:09 PM

Personally I think both side have gone too far in trying to defend their rights and to restrict arms. Some common sense would be nice starting with back ground checks for any and all firearm sales.

Giantone · 04-24-2013, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by firstdown

. Some common sense would be nice starting with back ground checks for any and all firearm sales.

Gun nuts and the NRA say no.

Alvin Walton · 04-23-2013, 06:41 PM

There also is no indication in records obtained from the ATF that any of the violations at Riverview involved gun sales tied to the Dec. 14 Newtown shootings.

That article does not reference anything bought illegally or incorrectly by the Lanza's.
Its just a bunch of hype.

Giantone = fail

RedskinRat · 04-24-2013, 05:39 PM

To Obama's dismay, America not outraged by gun control fail, poll suggests

On the surface, the poll released by The Washington Post and Pew Research Center made no sense. Only 47 percent of respondents said they were "disappointed" or "angry" that the Senate last week failed to advance a bill to expand background checks to gun shows and online sales.

Yet in February, a Pew poll found that 83 percent of respondents supported an expansion of background checks to cover gun shows and all private sales – measures that would actually be stricter than what the Senate rejected.

Assault weapons, for example, are used in only a small number of murders every year. And while Obama said up to 40 percent of guns are purchased without background checks, the actual number is closer to 20 percent, according to Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler.

POTUS got upset that the NRA supposedly misrepresented the facts of the debate, yet he used the same ploy to try to get his way.

Giantone · 04-25-2013, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

To Obama's dismay, America not outraged by gun control fail, poll suggests

On the surface, the poll released by The Washington Post and Pew Research Center made no sense. Only 47 percent of respondents said they were "disappointed" or "angry" that the Senate last week failed to advance a bill to expand background checks to gun shows and online sales.

Yet in February, a Pew poll found that 83 percent of respondents supported an expansion of background checks to cover gun shows and all private sales – measures that would actually be stricter than what the Senate rejected.

Assault weapons, for example, are used in only a small number of murders every year. And while Obama said up to 40 percent of guns are purchased without background checks, the actual number is closer to 20 percent, according to Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler.

POTUS got upset that the NRA supposedly misrepresented the facts of the debate, yet he used the same ploy to try to get his way.

Really, a Yahoo poll???ok.

RedskinRat · 04-25-2013, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

Really, a Yahoo poll???ok.

Reading comprehension FAIL. It says right there 'Pew' and 'Washington Post'.

Giantone · 04-25-2013, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Reading comprehension FAIL. It says right there 'Pew' and 'Washington Post'.

So if I hit your link does it ,or does it not take me to Yahoo news, you can't even spin your lies right?

CRedskinsRule · 04-25-2013, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

So if I hit your link does it ,or does it not take me to Yahoo news, you can't even spin your lies right?

A Yahoo news writer wrote an article about a Washington Post Poll. He says that in the second paragraph:

Quote:

On the surface, the poll released by The Washington Post and Pew Research Center made no sense. Only 47 percent of respondents said they were "disappointed" or "angry" that the Senate last week failed to advance a bill to expand background checks to gun shows and online sales.

RedskinRat · 04-25-2013, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

So if I hit your link does it ,or does it not take me to Yahoo news, you can't even spin your lies right?

At 04-25-2013 01:04 AM you posted "Really, a Yahoo poll???"

Is that accurate or not?

My link is a link to a Yahoo News report of two polls, one by The Washington Post and one by the Pew Research Center.

HailGreen28 · 04-25-2013, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

So if I hit your link does it ,or does it not take me to Yahoo news, you can't even spin your lies right?

How in the hell do you figure RR is lying on this? I mean, we know that you're a liar from the other thread, and you've lied in this one. But what the

? This is so obvious!

Giantone · 04-25-2013, 05:54 PM

Oh look , the NRA version of the Pep Boys are all here.

RedskinRat · 04-25-2013, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

Oh look , the NRA version of the Pep Boys are all here.

"Look over there!" isn't going to work.

Please explain yourself or admit you're wrong and go away.

04-23-2013, 05:14 PM	#1
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Re: Pro-gun article GiantOne, quit while you're behind.

04-23-2013, 05:49 PM	#2
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Re: Pro-gun article From Feistein's bill: All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm. Any gun owners find this as worrying as I do? I have at least two of those features on every semi-auto pistol I've owned.

04-23-2013, 06:09 PM	#4
firstdown Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 62 Posts: 15,817	Re: Pro-gun article Personally I think both side have gone too far in trying to defend their rights and to restrict arms. Some common sense would be nice starting with back ground checks for any and all firearm sales.

04-23-2013, 06:41 PM	#6
Alvin Walton Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan Posts: 5,741	Re: Pro-gun article There also is no indication in records obtained from the ATF that any of the violations at Riverview involved gun sales tied to the Dec. 14 Newtown shootings. That article does not reference anything bought illegally or incorrectly by the Lanza's. Its just a bunch of hype. Giantone = fail __________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968

04-24-2013, 05:39 PM	#7
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Re: Pro-gun article To Obama's dismay, America not outraged by gun control fail, poll suggests On the surface, the poll released by The Washington Post and Pew Research Center made no sense. Only 47 percent of respondents said they were "disappointed" or "angry" that the Senate last week failed to advance a bill to expand background checks to gun shows and online sales. Yet in February, a Pew poll found that 83 percent of respondents supported an expansion of background checks to cover gun shows and all private sales – measures that would actually be stricter than what the Senate rejected. Assault weapons, for example, are used in only a small number of murders every year. And while Obama said up to 40 percent of guns are purchased without background checks, the actual number is closer to 20 percent, according to Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. POTUS got upset that the NRA supposedly misrepresented the facts of the debate, yet he used the same ploy to try to get his way.

04-25-2013, 05:54 PM	#14
Giantone Gamebreaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 14,590	Re: Pro-gun article Oh look , the NRA version of the Pep Boys are all here. __________________ ....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.

Pro-gun article

Debating with the enemy