Post game Packers

[WillH]

Originally Posted by MTK

We're talking about replacing guys 3 games in? With who? If there were better options on the team they'd be in there already.

I think there's some juice for bringing back Gallete in that he is a true speed edge rusher, which we really don't have otherwise.

I'm not opposed to it I guess, but I'm not sure who I'd let go for him.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by MTK

We're talking about replacing guys 3 games in? With who? If there were better options on the team they'd be in there already.

Wouldn't mind seeing Mo Harris get some reps. Why not??

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Wouldn't mind seeing Mo Harris get some reps. Why not??

He was in there yesterday

[jamf]

Trent Williams to have Minor Knee Surgery

[Schneed10]

Yeah if you want to carve up performance by individual player and point to who's helping vs who's hurting, Josh Doctson is definitely the most disappointing. He's just not separating from anybody. No catches yesterday - he drew a couple big PI penalties which I noted before - but no catches is still disappointing.

But Matt Ioannidis is a beast. He's playing like the 1st rounder from that draft class, and Doctson is playing like the 5th rounder.

[WillH]

Doctson is concerning. I will say that there has been little opportunity for him so far, but there just doesn't seem to be much there. I have a feeling that the Saints game is going to require 4 quarters of high octane offense to win. If so, that's when we will need to see him do something. If he gets the looks and doesn't produce, I think we have our answer.

I also have been disappointed with JNo. I hate all the missed tackles from him so far this season, but with the overall production of the D it's hard to say that anyone is underperforming.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by WillH

Doctson is concerning. I will say that there has been little opportunity for him so far, but there just doesn't seem to be much there. I have a feeling that the Saints game is going to require 4 quarters of high octane offense to win. If so, that's when we will need to see him do something. If he gets the looks and doesn't produce, I think we have our answer.

I also have been disappointed with JNo. I hate all the missed tackles from him so far this season, but with the overall production of the D it's hard to say that anyone is underperforming.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I think offensive coordinators still respect him, nobody throws at him too often. I'm not mad at Norman at all.

[Schneed10]

I like how Ioannidis rhymes with Leonidas.

Somebody please patch these two GIFs together:

https://gph.is/1syMmXh

https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses...23376165855232

[sdskinsfan2001]

Still think Doctson is going to be really good for us. Maybe I'm delusional.

[Chico23231]

Adrian Peterson is fifth in the league for rushing yards at 236 yards, 4.2 ypc.

20 yards ahead of somebody named Saquon Barkley


Ballin

[skinsfaninok]

Kerrigan was on the field for 58 snaps and 41 of those was a pass rush and 3 of those resulted in a pressure all of which where hurries as I said earlier today.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Great all-around win. I'm slightly concerned about our rushing defense still in the fact it seems like the other teams get 0 yards or 12. I'd love to see them be a little more consistent in that. Overall, defense is vastly improved...

For all the questions about Doctson, does anyone else feel like the balls throw to him seem really inaccurate? Like, it's almost where it's just bad luck or something. It's like Smith seems accurate to everyone else and then throws a little bit out of reach of Doctson. Maybe he needs to start sacrificing enough to Jobu?

[ethat001]

When you look at the raw stats, you think Washington did great against the pass but struggled to stop the run. So far this season, teams have had more success on the ground than many predicted. But you have to put it all in context: By playing lighter in the box, Washington is challenging the opposing offense to try to push around its defensive linemen and linebackers to take advantage. And for the most part, the front seven is holding up so well that Washington doesn’t have to bring a safety forward. It helps the team allow fewer explosive plays in the passing game. The trade-off is a few more rushing yards, but not enough for it to matter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.2f45305e5224

MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by ethat001

MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..

Ahh, excellent, thanks!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Did anyone else watch the Colts/Eagles game? Just wondered if their defensive line worked the Eagles like they did ours? Really trying to nail down how that all happened and hope it was just a scheme thing.