Bucs Postgame

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Crazier things have happened, what if we get Chicago round 1? I like that match up.

We would have under 200 yards of offense and lose. Also the Bears are scoring points w/ Tribisky at QB. He had 6 td passes against the Bucs defense. So far bringing in Nagy looks like a great hire.

[skinsfaninok]

Houston will be a good close game, Houston isn't as good as TB, or even INDY on Offense. I love Watson though, he's a tough kid and a good QB. Their OL is not very good so we should get pressure.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Houston will be a good close game, Houston isn't as good as TB, or even INDY on Offense. I love Watson though, he's a tough kid and a good QB. Their OL is not very good so we should get pressure.

If Fitzpatrick scrambled like Tarkenton, what do you think Watson can do? 2 legit receivers in Hopkins and Thomas. Remember the Falcons patched line? Redskins need to dominate on D to win this game, after to iffy performances on D they are due to play better.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If Fitzpatrick scrambled like Tarkenton, what do you think Watson can do? 2 legit receivers in Hopkins and Thomas. Remember the Falcons patched line? Redskins need to dominate on D to win this game, after to iffy performances on D they are due to play better.

Watson moves a little but he's also injury prone so they limit his mobility.
Have we given up a 100 yards to a RB yet this yr? If not that is damn impressive, I can't remember that last time we did that thru 9 games.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If Fitzpatrick scrambled like Tarkenton, what do you think Watson can do? 2 legit receivers in Hopkins and Thomas. Remember the Falcons patched line? Redskins need to dominate on D to win this game, after to iffy performances on D they are due to play better.

Houston doesn't have the same receiving threats that the Bucs do. The Redskins D played it safe and kept the Bucs receivers in front of them all game. Hence why I think they allowed Fitz to scramble so much. After DeAndre Hopkins (who is an elite threat at receiver), I don't think any of their receivers scare anyone (we got lucky with Fuller being out).

Hopefully the Redskins D can contain Watson the same way they contained Cam. It'd be nice to have Dunbar back, last thing I want is to see Danny Johnson or Stroman covering Hopkins.

[Buffalo Bob]

Let me see in the last 5 seasons we have 3 wins, 4 wins, 9 wins, 8 wins, and 7 wins, yet we have guys complaining about 6-3. As Vince Lombardi used to say "What the hell is going on here?" Do note I have only been a hardcore Redskin fan since moving from Cali in 2011, but I didn't think it was always Super Bowl or bust here, this is finally a step in the right direction, stop complaining and look forward to further improvement.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

Let me see in the last 5 seasons we have 3 wins, 4 wins, 9 wins, 8 wins, and 7 wins, yet we have guys complaining about 6-3. As Vince Lombardi used to say "What the hell is going on here?" Do note I have only been a hardcore Redskin fan since moving from Cali in 2011, but I didn't think it was always Super Bowl or bust here, this is finally a step in the right direction, stop complaining and look forward to further improvement.

I have been a hardcore fan for probably 40 years or so. It is certainly not super bowl or bust. Nobody in their right mind thinks we are or should be going to the super bowl. We all want to, but nobody really thinks or believes that. Anyway, we have had moments, 1999, 2005,2007,2012, 2015 where we “thought” we were heading in the right direction also. Last time I checked you get no recognition in the history books for starting a season 6-3. The Carolina win was our only win against a team 500 or better. In the last two weeks we got absolutely man handled by a team with a losing record and we beat another team with a losing record because they gave us the game on a silver platter. I am simply reserving judgment until I see consistently good play because no team ever has made a living out of winning like we did yesterday.
It is ok to be skeptical about this team. Given their history. Given their injuries. Given their lackluster offense. It really is.

[jamf]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Houston doesn't have the same receiving threats that the Bucs do. The Redskins D played it safe and kept the Bucs receivers in front of them all game. Hence why I think they allowed Fitz to scramble so much. After DeAndre Hopkins (who is an elite threat at receiver), I don't think any of their receivers scare anyone (we got lucky with Fuller being out).

Hopefully the Redskins D can contain Watson the same way they contained Cam. It'd be nice to have Dunbar back, last thing I want is to see Danny Johnson or Stroman covering Hopkins.

Deandre Hopkins is 4th in the NFL in receiving yards. He has 5 TDs in the last 4 games and is on pace for 110+ receptions and 1500+ yards.

This guy is a matchup nightmare.

[httr198020]

I'm thrilled to be 6-3, but I'm not impressed with this team. The defense is very good. They went up against the best offense in football and only gave up 3 points. They forced 4 turnovers which is impressive. Yet they gave up 500 yards of total offense and a lot of that was a result of poor tackling and being out of position. We beat them by double digits. But keep in mind we played the worst defense in the league and we could only put up 16 points? In my opinion, we need a qb change right now. Alex Smith is horrible. I don't see us continuing to win with this below average passing game.

[NorCall11]

has anybody found out what all weapons we will have back next weekend? im getting sick of hearing about thompsons bruised ribs and then more bruised ribs. wear pads you idiot!

[skinsfaninok]

Nobody is talking about the skins.

Last 5 games = 4-1
VS the NFC = 6-2 (3rd best in conference)
Have not allowed over 17 points in 4 of the last 5.
+11 Turnover ratio.

4th in the NFL is Rush Defense.
Tied for 12th in sacks.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Nobody is talking about the skins.

Last 5 games = 4-1
VS the NFC = 6-2 (3rd best in conference)
Have not allowed over 17 points in 4 of the last 5.
+11 Turnover ratio.

4th in the NFL is Rush Defense.
Tied for 12th in sacks.

But we suck

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

But we suck

Wild and unbelievable stat: the Washington Redskins are in sole possession of first place in the NFC East in week 10 for the first time since 1991.

Another one

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Nobody is talking about the skins.

Last 5 games = 4-1
VS the NFC = 6-2 (3rd best in conference)
Have not allowed over 17 points in 4 of the last 5.
+11 Turnover ratio.

4th in the NFL is Rush Defense.
Tied for 12th in sacks.

I think it was on ESPN about a week ago listing the Division leaders, the teams that have the inside track to the wild card spots and those on the bubble. Of all those teams the only one receiving a negative comment was the Redskins. It said "Division leader because of a weak NFC East."

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

I think it was on ESPN about a week ago listing the Division leaders, the teams that have the inside track to the wild card spots and those on the bubble. Of all those teams the only one receiving a negative comment was the Redskins. It said "Division leader because of a weak NFC East."

What cracks me up is when other divisions are bad and the winner is 10-6 or 11-5 , they never talk down on that team.. Of course the Redskins get shit on