![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Quote:
[ but anyoen who says Betts over Vilma is out of their minds.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 896
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
I just hate giving up guys that are loyal...we have a bad track record for this stuff working out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
I think around here, no one doubts Vilma's abilities. What we're doubting is the quality of the trade (should it even happen).
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
leon isn't that great. the jets O line was better than expected last year, and it's only going to get better, which would let lesser talent at RB get by (See chester taylor and the vikes), but a good runner could really help them.
vilma is a GREAT player, but without DTs to protect him, his value to the defence would be greatly diminished. and depending on griffin to stay healthy and golston to turn into a superstud overnight is just betting too much on ifs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
the jenkins thing was purely speculative to begin with. it's not happening, unless the skins aren't going to try for a FA corner this offseason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Let me say that I am not trying to piss on our O-line. First of all, I think we have a top 5 line.
That being said, we don't have dock at the moment. To say that Jansen is a potential pro-bowler is more than wishful thinking. To honestly believe that our line is better than Indianapolis' at this point in time is beyond blind faith. At this present time we have one legitamate pro-bowler. Thomas is a candidate but he is not the same player that he was in '05. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
I could see a three-way trade!! The Skins send Betts and Arch. to the Bears. The Bears send T. Jones to the Jets, and the Jets send the Skins Villma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Benson and Betts seem pretty similar to me. Why would the Jets dump Vilma for T. Jones who may be released at some point (since Benson was a #4 pick)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 59
Posts: 890
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Well i wouldnt make that deal unless extra picks were involved. But hey were talking about the skins so we probably throw our other two picks in too to get Ramsey back lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
not that this matters, but i was talking to a bunch of football fans at work. all of them say that they would do this trade in a heartbeat, if they are the skins. i tend to agree. betts is a backup that fumbles too much for my liking. and running back isn't one of our weaknesses. and Vilma is a proven MIDDLE linebacker. not someone us fans are trying to convert
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Quote:
Also, I think it would be a decent gesture to allow Betts to go somewhere else and compete to be a #1 back, although that really shouldn't come into play when making the decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Two categories that offensive lines are judged on are rushing yards and sacks given up.
Just for the sake of throwing this out there the Skins were 4th in the NFL in rushing yards this year, the Colts were 18th. The Skins were 3rd in the NFL in sacks given up with 20, the Colts were #1 in the league and gave up 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
betts for vilma straight up is a steal. but moving out of that #6 pick for a #25 gaurantees you're DL is going to be awful all of next year. if we got a monster DL guy instead, #25 overall is a great spot for a top tier MLB. linebackers are easier to get in the 2nd round. it's hard to find elite QBs/LTs/DEs/DTs outside the top 10-16 picks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
The Jets just released Kevan Barlow which makes them even more determined to get a running back and are said to like betts will they be willing to add a extra draft pick to the trade now
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Draft Day Trades: Jets Interested? (rumor)
Quote:
Barlow sucks anyway, I don't think this changes the complexity of the deal any.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|