![]() |
|
|
#121 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Even though we have a quality backup it would be a mistake to depend on the option because of the high injury risk. I think it could be used effectively as long as RG3 is not taking a lot of hits.
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#122 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
If he chooses not to for whatever reason perhaps someone who knows him can get his sources. I'm interested in reading the actual person's(s) take who saw Cousins out-playing RG3 in 7 on 7.
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I agree. If you're going to put information like that out there, the least you can do is back it up, or if it's just your personal opinion, put that out there. My unnamed source tells me that putting unsubstantiated claims out there is not well received in the journalism business.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Just to clarify. I'm not saying we should use the option as our primary package, or alter the system completely, but instead offer more option looks to disturb defensives predictive abilities. I don't believe the option will be used (if it is at all), as a systemic staple. Moreover what I was eluding to in saying it's a hopeful prospect applies more to the coaching staffs willingness to adopt a less popular package in order to facilitate, and reinforce the strengths of the personel. The hopefulness spawns from the logic that this microcosm could eventually permeate the overall mentality.
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Where did Mike Shanahan hint at the option (3 times)?
Had a busy weekend and hadn't heard this..... |
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I thought RG3 said he is a pocket passer, that is his strength. Not a run a scrambling QB running the option. Let him learn the offense first. Once he gets injuried running the ball, I dont want to hear the complaining. U know why the option isnt run in the NFL?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
#128 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
Mike Shanahan: 5-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
I agree, if coach Shanahan is sincere (I believe he is) it is exciting to hear his willingness to tweak the offense to use all of RG3's weapons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Kinda didn't plan on listening to 30 minute interview on a rookie mini-camp just to hear a couple of sentences.
Could someone just tell me what he said or tell me where he spoke about running the option? |
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
Coach Shanahan at 23:55 - "...the fun part about Robert, the reason why we gave up what we gave up, is that he can do some things I believe no one has done. The dropping back, play action, quarterback keeps, option, and we'll see what he is comfortable with as time goes on..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
you know what would scare defenses more from the Skins? Basic, competent decision making from the QB position.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
![]() |
|
|