Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

So, ESPN took it down. Then, they put it back and added a small paragraph to the end...I don't know what to believe.

Redskins | Randle El agrees to contract
Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:57:23 -0800

ESPN.com reports free agent WR Antwaan Randle El has agreed to a six-year contract with the Washington Redskins, according to a source close to ESPN.com's Michael Smith.

From KFFL

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Just keep your fingers crossed!

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

ESPN ticker still posting Randle-El is a skin.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Any teams interested in trading for Jacobs?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=EXoffender]Any teams interested in trading for Jacobs?[/QUOTE]

Not a chance.

No one will trade for one of our leftovers after this deal. That is probably why San Francisco traded Lloyd before they signed anyone, to help keep some value in him.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Its also on the radio out here on the left coast on KMBR. It also said that Carter is a Skin and that the 49ers lost two free agents along with Lloyd! Sorry that is KHTK not KMBR!

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=EXoffender]Any teams interested in trading for Jacobs?[/QUOTE]

This guy would be the Lepper of free agent wide outs.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=drew54]Our wide outs could be the Posse 2.0[/QUOTE]


Not the Posse



[SIZE=7][COLOR=DarkRed]THE QUAD[/COLOR][/SIZE]

:point: :point: :point: :point:

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

All guessing aside, their forum is the ugliest thing I have ever seen.

[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]talking bout it on eagles board. They say that siruis and elfin say it isn't true??

[url="http://www.concretefield.com/forum/index.php?topic=17770.new#new"]http://www.concretefield.com/forum/index.php?topic=17770.new#new[/url][/QUOTE]

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Dana87]
[size=7][color=darkred]THE QUAD[/color][/size]

:point: :point: :point: :point:[/QUOTE]All in together now...

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=RedskinPete]Its also on the radio out here on the left coast on KMBR. It also said that Carter is a Skin and that the 49ers lost two free agents along with Lloyd![/QUOTE]Madden '06 roster updating as we speak. Damn. If you change Andre Carter from ROLB to RE he's now rated 99 OVR!

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Dana87]Not the Posse



[SIZE=7][COLOR=DarkRed]THE QUAD[/COLOR][/SIZE]

:point: :point: :point: :point:[/QUOTE]

I dont know, this isn't the run and shoot.

Joe Gibbs is not equal to Jerry Glanville.

But we could always try.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=hooskins]All guessing aside, their forum is the ugliest thing I have ever seen.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. It looks like it was started with a Fisher Price my first forum set.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Only thing that slightly worries me is that both moss and randle el are short, fast guys, I hope we don't get too 1-D.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=hooskins]Only thing that slightly worries me is that both moss and randle el are short, fast guys, I hope we don't get too 1-D.[/QUOTE]With the run? Who's paying attention to Portis when you have a WR corps like this?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

No I mean with passing, they are deep threats, etc....1-D in our passing game


[QUOTE=EXoffender]With the run? Who's paying attention to Portis when you have a WR corps like this?[/QUOTE]

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Can one of our great and powerful Mods change this thread title once we have official word?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=hooskins]No I mean with passing, they are deep threats, etc....1-D in our passing game[/QUOTE]


Cooley isn't afraid of going over the middle. And to be honest as long as someone is running a route underneath, teams will respect it because these guys are a juke away from a TD, every time. :food-smil

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=hooskins]No I mean with passing, they are deep threats, etc....1-D in our passing game[/QUOTE]I was being sarcastic.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=ESPN]The Redskins also acquired receiver Brandon Lloyd in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers on Saturday night. With the additions of Randle El and Lloyd to a receiving corps that already included Santana Moss and David Patten, Washington's offense has a Greatest Show on Turf feel for new coordinator Al Saunders.[/QUOTE]

Music to my ears

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Has this been made official?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

john clayton just said on espn news that Lloyd and Randle El would be in the $30 mill range over 6 years, each. Thats $90 mill to our recieving core if its true, WOW!!!

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]Music to my ears[/QUOTE]
And thanks to ESPN, I now have a new signature.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Wanga Skins]john clayton just said on espn news that Lloyd and Randle El would be in the $30 mill range over 6 years, each. Thats $90 mill to our recieving core if its true, WOW!!![/QUOTE]The signing bonus is key.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

I just left a signing with Doug Williams, John Riggins and Mark Rypien. For me to hear this is just what we needed because Dallas is close to signing T.O. and that puts us in the position to scoring 5 TD per game. I bet our offense won't be lowest scoring team this year.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

The signing bonus is important but I didn't hear what it was gonna be for either of them. Also how long does the signing get to be prorated out with the new CBA?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Wanga Skins]john clayton just said on espn news that Lloyd and Randle El would be in the $30 mill range over 6 years, each. Thats $90 mill to our recieving core if its true, WOW!!![/QUOTE]

My initial feeling is that they have overpaid for both. How do you pay them more than Moss?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

They probably did overpay but it helps sure up a big hole and it gives mr. saunders more toys. Also Moss got his deal done before he had ever put the type of numbers he put up in 2005. I wouldn't be suprised to see Moss renegotiate in the couple of years.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Wanga Skins]They probably did overpay but it helps sure up a big hole and it gives mr. saunders more toys. Also Moss got his deal done before he had ever put the type of numbers he put up in 2005. I wouldn't be suprised to see Moss renegotiate in the couple of years.[/QUOTE]

Ideally you don't have to restructure. This would bug me if I was Moss.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper]Ideally you don't have to restructure. This would bug me if I was Moss.[/QUOTE]
It would bug me too if I was Moss but maybe he and the rest of the team that was together for last years playoff run know that this is needed to win a championship. The guys seemed to be very open to restructure their contracts to keep the team intact so maybe Moss will be ok with it for now. Isn't he represented by the evil drew rosenhaus, if so.....UH OH!!!

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

if the skins signed randle el 6 years for 31 mil, as they say, then i think we definitely overpaid. He's just a slot receiver. True, he does return punts and he can occasionally throw the ball, but that's still too much. i wouldn't be suprised if moss becomes unhappy with his contract now.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Quite an array of weapons, Patten played like a fourth wideout last year and Jacobs had enough chances. I haven't read a full thread in a while, but ahem, cough, dare the youngster get a chance?

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

For what its worth...

The DJ at Lulus annouced the Randle-El signing around midnight (at least I think it was around midnight).

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

Why would Santana become unhappy. Thats rediculous. He's not that kind of guy anyway. But still, santana went from a dissapointment in NY to a beloved, HIGHLY PAID, player in DC. Many people said we overpaid for him last year, and he didn't hesitate to sign that contract. so in essense, i dont see santana getting upset.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=BleedBurgundy]I am so much more psyched about this than the Lloyd signing. I don't know which is going to be our #2? Will there be enough balls to go around? I hope Campbell is hitting the books hard... We're going to need him this year, no way is Brunell going to get it done all year, IMHO.[/QUOTE]

Me too...Lloyd has me WAY more excited! I think hes gonna be a SICK #2, with Randle-El catching passes in the slot, reverses, WR screens/passes and returning punts.

Wow.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=NFLNetwork]Why would Santana become unhappy. Thats rediculous. He's not that kind of guy anyway. But still, santana went from a dissapointment in NY to a beloved, HIGHLY PAID, player in DC. Many people said we overpaid for him last year, and he didn't hesitate to sign that contract. so in essense, i dont see santana getting upset.[/QUOTE]

Rediculous? You don't think he will want more money as an established wide receiver? You can combine Lloyd and Randle-Els stats and they are well short of Moss. This will be an issue down the road.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

thats 1 season. we are not talking about a guy that has had an incredibly productive carreer and as a result has a big ego (In Santana). Plus, we need to take the double teams off him...i think he'll take not having the double teams over "i want the biggest contract so i can get 2 catches a game cause they are double teaming me"

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper]Rediculous? You don't think he will want more money as an established wide receiver? You can combine Lloyd and Randle-Els stats and they are well short of Moss. This will be an issue down the road.[/QUOTE]

I totally agree. I can't see how Moss wouldn't feel upset about their signings and their respective contract numbers.

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

also, for what it is worth, the eagle fans are saying because the 10 mil is not up front it is a pretty good deal for both sides...

Re: Skins Signed Randle El
 

[QUOTE=NFLNetwork]thats 1 season. we are not talking about a guy that has had an incredibly productive carreer and as a result has a big ego (In Santana). Plus, we need to take the double teams off him...i think he'll take not having the double teams over "i want the biggest contract so i can get 2 catches a game cause they are double teaming me"[/QUOTE]

Do you know him personally?

If you set a team's receiving record you should be the highest paid guy and in today's nfl, agents use circumstances like this to help themselves and their client.