![]() |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[QUOTE] I hate injuries so I'm certainly not cheering, [/QUOTE]
me too unless they are non life threatening. [QUOTE] IT is about to get MUCH HOTTER .... Jessica Simpson is having drinks with Hollywood henderson and pacman ....poor Romo [/QUOTE] maybe they are talking about a 4 some?can't be hollywood only like paralyzed handicap[ed women in wheel chairs. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=Ade Jimoh Fan Club;489503]My responses to your post:
1) Can we trade them Durant Brooks for a bucket of chicken and 10 minutes with the Cowboy cheerleaders? (Ok - 2 minutes) Is that per cheerleader or overall? After the first couple i could go a little longer.... |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=irish;489482]Too bad for the Boys. This really opens things up for the Skins. They need to win the next 2.[/quote]
If the Browns play us like they're playing the Giants right now, next week's game will be tough, too. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
I wish I was more happy about romo being out, but they have so many weapons that I am not sure their offense will suffer too much with Brad in there for awhile. As long as he has the time he will keep the offense moving. But I'd rather see them without Romo then with him.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
The time off will probably be great for Tony Romo's game, although certainly it hurts the Boys in the short term.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
Id rather have them at their best
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
Watching Brad Johnson play QB is like watching paint dry. All he's going to do is dink and dunk. And while he'll cut down on the turnovers, the playmaking ability that Romo gives them goes out the window.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=Twilbert07;489560]If the Browns play us like they're playing the Giants right now, next week's game will be tough, too.[/quote]I wouldn't worry about that. There were 15 days between their last game and this game to prepare for, and they will only have 6 days to prepare for us.
Also, as much as the G-men were off their game, understand that -- much like the Rams vs. us -- the Browns don't win that game unless they finish +3 in the turnover margin (sound familiar?). If we simply protect the football better next week, the Browns won't touch us. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=GTripp0012;489643] If we simply protect the football better next week, the Browns won't touch us.[/quote]
thats a big frickin IF |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=htownskinfan;489672]thats a big frickin IF[/quote]
Is it really though? The Skins had 1 turnover through 5 games, and 1 game with 3. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now on the last game. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=GTripp0012;489275]Word is that he'll return in time to play us at FedEx.
The Cowboys play the Rams, Tampa, and the Giants in the time Romo will be out.[/quote] Which is fine. We're NOT SKURD! Just means he'll be rusty and wanting to protect his lil fanny finger from getting hit. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
While Brad Johnson has a noodle arm, he's a smart QB. This is going to open things up in the middle of the field for the Cowboys. Watch for TO or Crayton in the slot, and Witten over the middle to see a ton more looks. TO will stop whining for a few weeks because with Romo out, Johnson will have no choice but to get the ball to TO if they are going to be successful.
Plus with no Felix Jones, Tashard Choice is going to get a chance to relief Barber, who is going to see plenty of more carries. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
If Johnson shakes off the rust, I think he will bring the cowboys a sense of professionalism that is missing.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=CRedskinsRule;489714]If Johnson shakes off the rust, I think he will bring the cowboys a sense of professionalism that is missing.[/quote]
Exactly. There is something very wrong with the Boys right now. If you saw when Folk hit that FG to tie it, Romo barely showed any emotion. This is the guy that is never at a loss to smile or get excited. Someone made a great comparison to the Pats of the mid 1990s, after Parcells left, when they hired a players coach in Pete Carroll. What happened afterward was a team that showed a lack of discipline, committing dumb penalties. Larry Brown on the Cowboys postgame show made a great point. When he was playing, especially under Jimmy, they took pride in not making mistakes. To make mistakes was to jeopardize your position on the team. That doesn't seem to truly matter right now. I mean, if Wade Phillips wanted to cut a player right now, would he just be able to tell Jerry to do it and everything would be OK? I highly doubt it. All this being said, they are still 4-2, and these next three games are all winnable. If they can bond together as a team and truly play as one, this injury could be a blessing in disguise. Or, the whole damn thing could implode. I'm sure you Redskin fans would HATE to see that happen. :) |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[B]AS THE COWBOYS WORLD TURNS ...[/B]
The Soap opera in Dallas continues. The injuries to Tony Romo and Felix Jones is a new chapter in [B]AS THE COWBOYS WORLD TURNS[/B]. T.O. is always one catch or lack thereof from implosion. PacMan is one bar fight away from suspension. There is always so much drama in the big D. Stay tuned folks. The saga continues ... |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
wade phillips is a puppett and jerry jones of the world's best master of puppetts.
jj wants the world to think he knows it all about football,and that if the talent is there,anybody can coach the team.well guess what?he's made himself into a bigger jackass than he was when he ran jimmy johnson away.what an asshole! |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=pbhawks45;489722]Exactly. There is something very wrong with the Boys right now. If you saw when Folk hit that FG to tie it, Romo barely showed any emotion. This is the guy that is never at a loss to smile or get excited.
Someone made a great comparison to the Pats of the mid 1990s, after Parcells left, when they hired a players coach in Pete Carroll. What happened afterward was a team that showed a lack of discipline, committing dumb penalties. Larry Brown on the Cowboys postgame show made a great point. When he was playing, especially under Jimmy, they took pride in not making mistakes. To make mistakes was to jeopardize your position on the team. That doesn't seem to truly matter right now. I mean, if Wade Phillips wanted to cut a player right now, would he just be able to tell Jerry to do it and everything would be OK? I highly doubt it. All this being said, they are still 4-2, and these next three games are all winnable. If they can bond together as a team and truly play as one, this injury could be a blessing in disguise. Or, the whole damn thing could implode. I'm sure you Redskin fans would HATE to see that happen. :)[/quote] Funny I saw it very differently when you guy's tied it up at the end of the game. They showed a shot of TO and Romo and they both had that smirk on their face like now we will put them away in overtime. I even had that same feeling as here they go to pull this one off but we now know "the rest rest of the story". |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=Mattyk72;489687]Is it really though?
The Skins had 1 turnover through 5 games, and 1 game with 3. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now on the last game.[/quote] I think so,I think it was a fluke we went 5 games without a turnover,that just doesnt happen,as a matter of fact it had never happenned before in nfl history,so to think were going to stay on that same path IMO is very wishful thinking.Now hopefully there wont be anymore 3 turnover games,a more manageable 1 turnover game. Is it just me or does it seem like over the yrs when we have turnovers they usually turn into HUGE plays for the other team.Cant we just fumble the ball and somebody fall on it instead of running for a td? It seems like over the yrs theres been a few times where we would just dominate a team but the turnovers would kill us because they werent just fumbles or ints,they were fumbles or ints that were returned for TDS!! I can remember a game againts the eagles in the 80's I think,Gerald Riggs was carving up the eagles,had over 200 yrds rushing,was going in for a score to put the game away and fumbled and it was returned for an eagles td,eagles win. That kinda shit always seems to happen to us,or maybe i just think that cause Im a skin fan,maybe other fans feel the same way about their teams |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
come sunday at 415pm,we'll all see whether if it was or was not a fluke.
sunday's game will decide the season in my view. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=htownskinfan;489762]I think so,I think it was a fluke we went 5 games without a turnover,that just doesnt happen,as a matter of fact it had never happenned before in nfl history,so to think were going to stay on that same path IMO is very wishful thinking.Now hopefully there wont be anymore 3 turnover games,a more manageable 1 turnover game.
Is it just me or does it seem like over the yrs when we have turnovers they usually turn into HUGE plays for the other team.Cant we just fumble the ball and somebody fall on it instead of running for a td? It seems like over the yrs theres been a few times where we would just dominate a team but the turnovers would kill us because they werent just fumbles or ints,they were fumbles or ints that were returned for TDS!! I can remember a game againts the eagles in the 80's I think,Gerald Riggs was carving up the eagles,had over 200 yrds rushing,was going in for a score to put the game away and fumbled and it was returned for an eagles td,eagles win. That kinda shit always seems to happen to us,or maybe i just think that cause Im a skin fan,maybe other fans feel the same way about their teams[/quote] 5 games without a turnover is rare, but I also think coughing it up 3 times in a game is almost as much of a fluke for this team. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=Mattyk72;489767]5 games without a turnover is rare, but I also think coughing it up 3 times in a game is almost as much of a fluke for this team.[/quote]Rare,and lucky. Because, instead of fumbling 4 times against the Rams, if we had fumbled say, once more against the Saints, twice against the Cowboys, and once vs. the Eagles (same ball security %), we'd be staring 2-4 in the face right now, and 0-3 in the division.
Even with the loss to the Rams, we're clearly better off the way things HAVE worked out as opposed to what could have been. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
I think what this proves is that Zorn (or Gibbs for that matter) can stress ball security all they want, but if the QB's arm is hit, or a helmet hits the ball squarely, it's still going to come out.
What hasn't happened yet is that Jason Campbell hasn't thrown a ball into coverage that he shouldn't have thrown. And that's a huge advantage we have over other teams. Because teams that play us are throwing very interceptable balls, and if that trend continues we will dominate the turnover margin this season. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=Mattyk72;489767]5 games without a turnover is rare, but I also think coughing it up 3 times in a game is almost as much of a fluke for this team.[/quote]
I really really hope your right |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
Romo willing to play?
[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3645737]ESPN - Source: Romo tells coaches he'll play with broken finger - NFL[/url] |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
so i heard
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
ha ha! Good! this could mean big time trouble for the girls. however, if romo hurts it bad enough to where he can't play the Wash. game, Brad Johnson will prob rip us to shreds,(always does), but in the same breath, dallas prob won't win many other games.a gift and a curse...
on another note, does anyone else find it bizarre that we play dallas at wash. after our bye week but cowgirls also have their bye week that same week? kinda takes away any advantage of the bye week doesn't it? In all my years i don't think I've ever heard of 2 teams playing each other after bye week. they should do them all like this...imho |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=GTripp0012;489775]I think what this proves is that Zorn (or Gibbs for that matter) can stress ball security all they want, but if the QB's arm is hit, or a helmet hits the ball squarely, it's still going to come out.
What hasn't happened yet is that Jason Campbell hasn't thrown a ball into coverage that he shouldn't have thrown. And that's a huge advantage we have over other teams. Because teams that play us are throwing very interceptable balls, and if that trend continues we will dominate the turnover margin this season.[/quote] JC is really doing a great job protecting the ball. Just an amazing job to not have an INT so far. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
He couldn't hold onto the ball with all of his fingers in tact. So, how many fumbles will he have with a broken finger? 7? 8? :D
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
romo is stupid.he could and will be one rejected pass away from missing the whole season.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=johnerotten;490555]romo is stupid.he could and will be one rejected pass away from missing the whole season.[/quote]
GO RAMS! They pressured Campbell very well, better than anyone else this season so far. Hopefully they can get some good shots on Romo too. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
I was surprised he wasn't going to play, not taking anything away from a broken finger, just seemed 4 weeks was way to long to be out. If Campbell did that, the threads would probably light up.
But why would Favre call another team's qb in the middle of the season??? would he do that if he had been in the NFC? weird. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=CRedskinsRule;490568]I was surprised he wasn't going to play, not taking anything away from a broken finger, just seemed 4 weeks was way to long to be out. If Campbell did that, the threads would probably light up.
But why would Favre call another team's qb in the middle of the season??? would he do that if he had been in the NFC? weird.[/quote] Butt Buddies? |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=GTripp0012;489775]I think what this proves is that Zorn (or Gibbs for that matter) can stress ball security all they want, but if the QB's arm is hit, or a helmet hits the ball squarely, it's still going to come out.
What hasn't happened yet is that Jason Campbell hasn't thrown a ball into coverage that he shouldn't have thrown. And that's a huge advantage we have over other teams. Because teams that play us are throwing very interceptable balls, and if that trend continues we will dominate the turnover margin this season.[/quote] I have thought it has been kind of funny while Troy Aikman has been announcing our games he has talked about how well JC holds on to the ball in trafic and does not put it on the ground. Everytime I hear him say this I jus think back to all his fumbles last year. He is doing a better job of protecting the ball but I'm not ready to say he does a great job of not fumbling because of how many he had last year. Its like Aikman is just looking at what he has done over the past 6 weeks. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=firstdown;490597]I have thought it has been kind of funny while Troy Aikman has been announcing our games he has talked about how well JC holds on to the ball in trafic and does not put it on the ground. Everytime I hear him say this I jus think back to all his fumbles last year. He is doing a better job of protecting the ball but I'm not ready to say he does a great job of not fumbling because of how many he had last year. Its like Aikman is just looking at what he has done over the past 6 weeks.[/quote]
I was thinking about this the other day. All the wierd drills JZ ran last summer may have done some good. Specifically, look at the way JC handles himself under pressure in the pocket this year. Always looking downfield, maintaining focus on the play and not the whirlwind of activity around him. Maybe throwing blocking pads at him worked? It may have also helped him stay out of trouble thus far in general. HTTR |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=firstdown;490597]I have thought it has been kind of funny while Troy Aikman has been announcing our games he has talked about how well JC holds on to the ball in trafic and does not put it on the ground. Everytime I hear him say this I jus think back to all his fumbles last year. He is doing a better job of protecting the ball but I'm not ready to say he does a great job of not fumbling because of how many he had last year. Its like Aikman is just looking at what he has done over the past 6 weeks.[/quote]
He's done a great job [I]this year[/I]. Aikman has referenced the fact that in the past he didn't do a very good job at holding on to the ball. |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
london fletcher can't cover michael westbrook is about the worst thing i have heard aikman say bad about any redskin this season.
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
On ESPN's NFC East Blog, it says Jerry Jones was catching Romo's passes before practice, and that JJ thinks Romo could play on Sunday. I am glad Snyder has pretty much learned to let the coaches coach!
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
I think Brett Favre could and has pulled off playing effectively with a broken finger....but Tony Homo is no Brett Favre. So I hope if he does play they break the rest of his fingers for being such a fool..
|
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[QUOTE] On ESPN's NFC East Blog, it says Jerry Jones was catching Romo's passes before practice, and that JJ thinks Romo could play on Sunday. I am glad Snyder has pretty much learned to let the coaches coach! [/QUOTE]
is'nt that the truth?i thought the league had some sort of rule BANNING the owners from the sidelines during the season except for emergencies?that old bastard is down there every week.he is also gonna be the one to decide if romo plays this week,not the coaches or doctors.that's bullshit! |
Re: Romo out 4 Weeks
[quote=johnerotten;490647]london fletcher can't cover michael westbrook is about the worst thing i have heard aikman say bad about any redskin this season.[/quote]
Kinda tough to cover him since he's out of the league. I'm guessing you meant Brian Westbrook of the Eagles. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.