Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=flaskinsfan8;678844]I would definately say Brandon Marshall. One, TO is way past his prime and a headache. Also, I went to UCF so I like Brandon Marshall.

T.O. sucks.[/quote]

I have to say this is an extremely nice arguement. Fair and to the point.

I'd still take T.O. There is no draft pick required. I will say that I wouldn't mind Marshall if Denver would take one of our draft picks from next year. We are 2 short this year. No need to over do it.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I just want to know how on earth could anyone say no to taking an emotional person like this. He's obviously loves his teamates. We need some of this......:)

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbHkJ2DQHqE]YouTube - Terrell Owens crying like a baby.[/url]

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;678848]Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though[/quote]

Smoot got to disagree. Whitehurst is grabidge

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I don't have any real opinion of Whitehurst, I've seen enough of him to say...I have no real opinion of him.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;678848]Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though[/quote]

Ugh not Landry...I really think he can still be a good player with different coaching. He's one of the very few players on the roster i would rather not trade.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

None of the above.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I'll take neither

but if I had to take one, I'd take Marshall. Younger, better hands, just wants to be paid, just what snyder can do for him. I would not give up my first rounder for him though, I'd only swap at best but I really don't want to do that either.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

If you force me to pick then as sick as it makes me to say it I would rather have TO. I think Marshall would help them more on the field but TO will not cost them anything but money.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Terrell Owens wouldn't be a bad signing because he won't cost a mint in money and no compensation is required. The Redskins don't have the luxury of surrending draft picks for Marshall unless Denver is willing to trade him for say McIntosh and Kelly straight up.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Nada! Let them go elsewhere.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Both of these guys are viruses.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

This doesn't even depend on if it was Shanahan we were actually dealing with all those times they got over on us in trades. Denver thinks all their players are gold. We don't really need receivers atm and if we did I wouldn't get one from Denver. I thought Shanny was going to even cut Marshal at one point when he was there. If you got to have a receiver get Owens with and incentive based front loaded contract. But again why.....we got three good possibilities. I'm really waiting to see Marko in some games.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

The way Bruce Allen has been negotiating these contracts, I wouldn't be surprised that if (we were to) get TO, it'd be for a base salary of 10K or something ridiculously cheap.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I would rather not sign either. After all the crap I've given Cowgirl fans about T.O. uhhh.....no thank you.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Ruhskins;678905]The way Bruce Allen has been negotiating these contracts, I wouldn't be surprised that if (we were to) get TO, it'd be for a base salary of 10K or something ridiculously cheap.[/quote]

With crazy incentives. Don't say anything remotely critical of the QB, coaches, or any other teammmates unless told otherwise $1 million.

[quote=53Fan;678983]I would rather not sign either. After all the crap I've given Cowgirl fans about T.O. uhhh.....no thank you.[/quote]

Yeah, but now he would be our crap.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

^ Crap is the key word Dirtbag. Once he starts dropping passes all hell would break loose around here. Besides, I don't want him taking time away from our young guys. But that's just me.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I want both. I am tired of this b.s. waiting game! We haven't pissed away a pick for a big name yet. We dumped a bunch of overpriced veterans. We made saavy cap moves and we let people come here and leave town.

UNACCEPTABLE!!!!

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;679003]I want both. I am tired of this b.s. waiting game! [B]We haven't pissed away a pick for a big name yet.[/B] We dumped a bunch of overpriced veterans. We made saavy cap moves and we let people come here and leave town.

UNACCEPTABLE!!!![/quote]

We could always sign Jason Taylor again!

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=53Fan;679004]We could always sign Jason Taylor again![/quote]

I am not for that at all, but he would be a better fit with the current regime!

Does anyone know someone who bought that jersey?

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;679006]I am not for that at all, but he would be a better fit with the current regime!

[B]Does anyone know someone who bought that jersey[/B]?[/quote]

Man they use to have it in every department store around here...cheap! And no, I don't know anyone who owns one.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=53Fan;679004]We could always sign Jason Taylor again![/quote]

It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Marshall in a heartbeat...gotta be like 10 years younger!

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;679008]It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.[/quote]

If you show pass rushing skills, you're immediately in his doghouse. I'm pretty stoked about seeing the defense cut loose this year.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

T.O. will always be a Cowgirl to me, reminds me of Michael Irvin...I can't stand the guy....every time we touch that teams' players we get hexed.
It's really simple....stay away from anyone ever associated to the Cowboys....PERIOD...they are the ENEMY.

Brandon Marshall is fine, but trading anything for him is NOT.
If we trade for someone, it should be for a starting LT.
That is all I have to say about that.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Zerohero;678780]As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles[/quote]


Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;679016]Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.[/quote]

Yeah i don't want either, just if we had to pick one.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;679016]Don't see why we would go after either man. IF we were so screwed at WR we will just draft one. But I agree, TO will be cheaper and the Buffalo experience probably had a humbling effect on him as he can see the show is slowly coming to an end for him. At this point the money isn't the primary motivator, as I am sure he wants a ring before he bows out.[/quote]

Still 829 yards with Ryan Fitzgerald as your QB is pretty impressive, especially for a guy with as much mileage as T.O.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

neither...and here is why

1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp)
2) why not develop our own receivers?
3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing
4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does.

This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Neither, develop the one's we have if possible.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I would rather have T.O! Marshall is way to expensive.