Brandon or T.O. ?

SOUL-SKINS · 03-26-2010, 12:56 PM

This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall.

Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall?

freddyg12 · 03-26-2010, 01:03 PM

IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

Longtimefan · 03-26-2010, 01:04 PM

Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out.

I would say no to TO under any circumstance.

BigHairedAristocrat · 03-26-2010, 01:07 PM

I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks.

Skinny Tee · 03-26-2010, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddyg12

IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

KLHJ2 · 03-26-2010, 01:36 PM

I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

doughtydoubter · 03-26-2010, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

good point

Zerohero · 03-26-2010, 01:41 PM

As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles

Longtimefan · 03-26-2010, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.

steveo395 · 03-26-2010, 01:51 PM

Do not sign either of them. We are trying to build a team for the long term. T.O. is too old, but that is actually the least of his problems. We would have to give up too much to get Marshall and he has character problems too.

We need to build from the inside out. If we trade for Marshall, we will have no o-line, which is much more important. Plus, we need to give Thomas and Kelly a shot.

MTK · 03-26-2010, 01:51 PM

Neither.

McD5 · 03-26-2010, 01:52 PM

I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

KLHJ2 · 03-26-2010, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Longtimefan

We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.

Look, I don't care who we have playing WR. Once they get to that level (NFL) all of them can peform to a satisfactory level, all they have to do is catch the ball when they are thrown to. The guys we have will look like studs as soon as Campbell or whoever the QB is, is not throwing off of his right ass cheek anymore.

Lotus · 03-26-2010, 02:01 PM

I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me.

As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly.

Chico23231 · 03-26-2010, 02:08 PM

Marshall by far and away.....but Ill take neither at this point if it means giving away draft picks....We need to add a WR with ARE gone. At this point wait for more cuts, I really dont waste another pick on one...we have the youth, lets add a dependable vet for cheap.

03-26-2010, 01:03 PM	#2
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

03-26-2010, 01:04 PM	#3
Longtimefan Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md. Posts: 4,832	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out. I would say no to TO under any circumstance.

03-26-2010, 01:07 PM	#4
BigHairedAristocrat Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,712	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks. __________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.

03-26-2010, 01:36 PM	#6
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 46 Posts: 5,829	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind. I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

03-26-2010, 01:41 PM	#8
Zerohero Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: phoenix, az Age: 46 Posts: 901	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles

03-26-2010, 12:56 PM	#1
SOUL-SKINS Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Connecticut Posts: 896	Brandon or T.O. ? This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall. Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall? __________________ TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART

03-26-2010, 01:51 PM	#10
steveo395 The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,674	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Do not sign either of them. We are trying to build a team for the long term. T.O. is too old, but that is actually the least of his problems. We would have to give up too much to get Marshall and he has character problems too. We need to build from the inside out. If we trade for Marshall, we will have no o-line, which is much more important. Plus, we need to give Thomas and Kelly a shot. __________________

03-26-2010, 01:51 PM	#11
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,569	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Neither. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-26-2010, 01:52 PM	#12
McD5 Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 35	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall. A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

03-26-2010, 02:01 PM	#14
Lotus Fire Bruce NOW Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 11,434	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me. As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly. __________________ Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny

03-26-2010, 02:08 PM	#15
Chico23231 Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 34,616	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Marshall by far and away.....but Ill take neither at this point if it means giving away draft picks....We need to add a WR with ARE gone. At this point wait for more cuts, I really dont waste another pick on one...we have the youth, lets add a dependable vet for cheap. __________________ My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us

Brandon or T.O. ?

Locker Room Main Forum