![]() |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[QUOTE=12thMan]I've always wondered how to spell kimosabe:)[/QUOTE]
Hopefully I didn't date myself by using a Lone Ranger reference. |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[quote=Ghost]Hopefully I didn't date myself by using a Lone Ranger reference.[/quote]
Actually your screen name is probably dating you more!! |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
25%... ade made it two year in a row after he was a gauranteed cut and turned out to be somewhat useful, so there are no locks.
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[QUOTE=12thMan]Actually your screen name is probably dating you more!![/QUOTE]
OK, now that's funny!:rofl: |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[quote=Beemnseven]On a Joe Gibbs coached team? There's not a chance in hell they keep 6 wideouts. To have that many, means that you keep one less offensive lineman, tight end, you name it, off the roster every game. For a team that's expected to use 2 or 3 wideouts at most through most of any game, plus have enough room on the active roster to use Cooley, Fauria, a backup running back and full back -- not to mention a defensive coach that depends on multiple defensive backs -- there's just not enough room for 6 WRs.[/quote]
You and Schneed are both right. Not really sure what I was thinking when I typed that response. Mathematically it felt like I had worked it out, but probably because I don't want to cut either Thrash for his ST skills or Jacobs because I cringe to think he'll do for another team what we've expected him to do here. |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[quote=TAFKAS]damn, I thought this thread was about a pimpin' casio calculator watch personally signed by TJ.
He'll have plenty of time to sign watches as he'll be in the first round of cuts[/quote] First it was Patten now its Jacobs...............:doh: |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
I think if it's between him and thrash he'll win. I like Thrash Marty should have never let him go to the Eagles. Last year thrash was slow. On the same token Jacobs was thowing up dueing the seahwks game. I still don't know if he makes it. I would take a gamble onan unproven rookie before I sign them. Time for new blood unless Jacobs shows what he got.
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[QUOTE=BMF21]First it was Patten now its Jacobs...............:doh:[/QUOTE]
Why'd you quote me there? By the way, I've decided I'm going to start charging royalties for having my posts quoted. |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
I would have to say 50 50. I am getting tierd of hearing how great the kid is. It's time to see it in a game.
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
With Patten's good attitude and Thrash at least proving in his career he could halfway produce, I see him gone...100% GONE!
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
Yeah, lost in all this WR discussion is David Patten. Gibbs has been raving about the guy all offseason. His attitude, his work ethic, and his performance in camp. He's a 100% lock to make the team (cap is not a concern, JoeCrisp, the team is under the cap and there aren't any decent players left available on the market).
And there's no way in hell Gibbs will keep six WRs. These are things we should know just from paying close attention to the team. Gibbs never keeps 6 WRs, and he loves David Patten - remember, Gibbs signed Patten and traded for Thrash, he [B]inherited[/B] Jacobs. With those things in mind, it comes down to Thrash vs Jacobs for 5th WR. So I don't see how anyone can put the odds at better than 50/50, and 50/50 would be ignoring the fact that Thrash is way better on special teams. Jacobs has no realistic shot, IMO. |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
I don't know why the hell he's been wasting a roster spot for as long as he has. Let the guy go already... its not like he's going to ever come out of his shell and become a productive wideout... and who cares what he does in practice from time to time... hes never done anything at all when it counts...
I have him with 0 chances on our roster... he'll get signed by the cowboys so they can pick his brain about our offense before they play us... just like barrow last year... |
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
yeah, we see how well that worked out. jacobs is finished here.
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
Would it be financially smart to keep Jacobs on the practice squad? I mean at this point we would already have to absorb his contract for this season and this would leave us with a guy who knows the offense and players on our team better than any free agent wideout. I know we are starting out with more quality depth at WR than last year but it wouldn’t hurt to be able to pull Jacobs off the practice squad to fill in for WR or ST duty barring an injury.
|
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch
[QUOTE=Wanga Skins]Would it be financially smart to keep Jacobs on the practice squad? I mean at this point we would already have to absorb his contract for this season and this would leave us with a guy who knows the offense and players on our team better than any free agent wideout. I know we are starting out with more quality depth at WR than last year but it wouldn’t hurt to be able to pull Jacobs off the practice squad to fill in for WR or ST duty barring an injury.[/QUOTE]
That Guy is pulling his hair out right now reading this post, haha. TG, would you like to field this question? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.