Re: Most surprising cut?
 

I was actually kinda surprised by all of them. Especially after the way Farris played and the way Parson returned kicks. I think James Thrash should have played himself off this team this preseason. I don't see what the benefit of keeping him is. I think they should have kept either Farris or Parson.

I was also very surprised by the cut of Ron Warner, he played very well last season when he was given a chance. The same for Wilds. I just don't understand it, myself.

However, I am pleased to see that Nemo and Rock stayed on the team.

Re: Most surprising cut?
 

[QUOTE=jdlea]I was actually kinda surprised by all of them. Especially after the way Farris played and the way Parson returned kicks. I think James Thrash should have played himself off this team this preseason. I don't see what the benefit of keeping him is. I think they should have kept either Farris or Parson.

I was also very surprised by the cut of Ron Warner, he played very well last season when he was given a chance. The same for Wilds. I just don't understand it, myself.

However, I am pleased to see that Nemo and Rock stayed on the team.[/QUOTE]

thrash is our #1 teams player as a gunner, he had the most ST tackles, some decent returns, and he played alright at WR and hback last year in limit time.

Re: Most surprising cut?
 

I had to say that Warner surprised me the most. McCune's cut was an eyebrow-raiser, but we all knew there was a logjam at LB. And I'm mildly surprised by Dyson, because I thought we needed a sizeable WR. But Warner came out of nowhere for me, I didn't see that coming at all. I didn't realize Nic Clemons was doing well.

Re: Most surprising cut?
 

I voted McCune but I was also kind of disappointed that Farris got cut. He looked pretty damn good in that last game...