Re: Good for Campbell
 

Blache really called good defensive games when Hall wasn't in the lineup. Actually, that's pretty much true of 2008 as well.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

:) make super...

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/08/11/al-davis-this-years-raiders-are-like-the-1980-super-bowl-champs/]Al Davis: This year's Raiders are like the 1980 Super Bowl champs | ProFootballTalk.com[/url]

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;719083][URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/08/11/al-davis-this-years-raiders-are-like-the-1980-super-bowl-champs/"]Al Davis: This year's Raiders are like the 1980 Super Bowl champs | ProFootballTalk.com[/URL][/quote]

I don't see a Cliff Branch type of wr in the Oakland line up. Davis is being optimistic and I think Oak has had a good off season but I don't think they're even a playoff team. But they should be better plus they play in weak division.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[quote=skinsfan69;719088]I don't see a Cliff Branch type of wr in the Oakland line up. Davis is being optimistic and I think Oak has had a good off season but I don't think they're even a playoff team. But they should be better plus they play in weak division.[/quote]

No, Davis is being senile.

They could push for a WC spot with luck and health though...or a total collapse by the Chargers.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

LOL Al thinks JC could take that team to a SB?????? Good Luck

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;719124]LOL Al thinks JC could take that team to a SB?????? Good Luck[/quote]

Or his new QB, Colt. The timing of this prediction...

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;719124]LOL Al thinks JC could take that team to a SB?????? Good Luck[/quote]


He must not have ever watched any Campbell game tape. I am not even going to waste my time reading the article.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

You guys may want to tread lightly with all this anti JC talk. I get blasted something serious whenever I speak the truth,...or at least my truth about that guy. Buuuuuuut who knows maybe some of you all were going on me for saying he was a bum. But Hey, give him a shot.

Seriously though, I don't give a hell what he does out there. He should've done it here, but he never got a shot though right guys ????

Bum ass Farger !!!!

Re: Good for Campbell
 

[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;719160]He must not have ever watched any Campbell game tape. I am not even going to waste my time reading the article.[/quote]

Well, it IS Al Davis...via PFT...

Re: Good for Campbell
 

Campbell should do well in that offense, more suited to his style than the WCO. And Louis Murphy should be a good target for him. I see him improving off his numbers last year.

All that said though, while I think the Raiders may compete for a .500 record which could win that division that's as far as I see them going

Re: Good for Campbell
 

I don't think the Raidahs are Super Bowl contenders, but they do have a bit of talent and a lot of their scoring woes could be pinned on Fat JaMarcus being just plain bad. 8-8 seems doable for them.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

Can anyone please tell me why everyone is on the JC bandwagon ? ESPN always talked down on Jason but when he leaves D.C, the guy becomes the Raiders savior??? LOL

Re: Good for Campbell
 

Well he improves the situation there, he's got a huge chip on his shoulder/something to prove, and the system fits him better as a dropback guy.

Re: Good for Campbell
 

I just love how Campbell was a the problem in DC and the answer in Oakland