Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Trample the Elderly;572822]Do you think that they O-Line will be ready to start against the GMen and win? I'm more than confident about about the D. Even the special teams will be better with Hunter. I'm not hating on the O-Line, but as of right now I don't think they're a "Championship Level" squad.[/quote]

I was alluding to the fact that all throughout the offseason, some people here were talking as though last year's problems were solely Campbell's fault and there wasn't much said about the offensive line.

The offensive line has a lot to prove, and these minor injuries are likely to cause concern. I do think we have a better (and younger) line than last year's, and I think going up against the monster of a defense we have should help them. I think some people are overreacting a bit about the offensive line; however I wouldn't be opposed to the team getting a veteran tackle for thee right side (Jones...maybe Runyan).

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Ruhskins;572836]I was alluding to the fact that all throughout the offseason, some people here were talking as though last year's problems were solely Campbell's fault and there wasn't much said about the offensive line.

The offensive line has a lot to prove, and these minor injuries are likely to cause concern. I do think we have a better (and younger) line than last year's, and I think going up against the monster of a defense we have should help them. I think some people are overreacting a bit about the offensive line; however I wouldn't be opposed to the team getting a veteran tackle for thee right side (Jones...maybe Runyan).[/quote]

If we get Runyan we'll need to get some aerosol smell-good too.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Lotus;572826]Ok, try this:

Trade Golston or Monty, plus Doughty, to Jax for Tony Pashos.[/quote]

I'm fine with it, but I'd rather just pick up any of the free agents out there. I do really hope we get a tackle with experience. I feel like the FO feels like they have to stick by what they said to not bring new guys in, but just suck it up and do what everybody knows is what's best for the team. Bring in one guy and everybody is gonna be happy.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

Things could be worse. The Iggles line sounds like it's falling apart. There's a good article by Larry Weisman on The Redskins Official Site about the problems the Iggles are having.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=JLee9718;572814]With Heyer healthy the O-Line was looking bad. How's it going to be if a couple of key guys get hurt? The D-Line is tearing them up anyway.[/quote]

I believe Haynesworth is likely making the offensive line look worse than it will be against most of our opponents, but I hear you.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

Two consecutive years now, Heyer's been an above average RT. I think we forget that because last year he was so ungodly disasterous on the left side, that we judged his abilities early. But the biggest problem is that he just looked like a RT on the left side. His footwork was terrible. He's never had that problem on the right side.

Of course, the interior line is the cause of concern. There's Thomas, and who knows what we can get out of him the rest of his career. There's Rabach, and we know perfectly well what we're getting out of him the rest of his career. And Dockery, well, the last time he was here, Rabach and Thomas were quality offensive lineman. He's still the best out of the three, but best case scenario, we get our money's worth when he does an adequate job filling into Pete Kendall's shoes.

Outside of a nice half season from Fabini in 2007, and a good game or two from Mike Pucillo and Rabach here and there, the last time we had a decent C or RG was 2006. Tackle might be the least of the lines concerns, especially since Samuels seems to be back in top form.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=53Fan;572902]Things could be worse. The Iggles line sounds like it's falling apart. There's a good article by Larry Weisman on The Redskins Official Site about the problems the Iggles are having.[/quote]

Agreed, it was a very good article. Here's the link...

[url=http://www.redskins.com/gen/articles/For_Redskins__O_Line_Issues_Are_Short_Term_45793.jsp]For Redskins, O-Line Issues Are Short Term[/url]

I'm sure some Debbie Downer will say that this is the Redskins website, blah blah blah, but Weisman makes some good points.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=GTripp0012;572912]Two consecutive years now, Heyer's been an above average RT.[/quote]

Why, then, was Heyer unable to reclaim his starting role at RT from Jansen?

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;572917]Why, then, was Heyer unable to reclaim his starting role at RT from Jansen?[/quote]

That's a good question, but I personally would have kept Heyer in there and I think Jansens play proves my point.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Ruhskins;572913]Agreed, it was a very good article. Here's the link...

[url=http://www.redskins.com/gen/articles/For_Redskins__O_Line_Issues_Are_Short_Term_45793.jsp]For Redskins, O-Line Issues Are Short Term[/url]

I'm sure some Debbie Downer will say that this is the Redskins website, blah blah blah, but Weisman makes some good points.[/quote]

Yeah I appreciated the perspective. Very interesting how much positive news Rinehart is getting. Buges has always been rather sparing in his compliments unless it's a surly veteran at issue...sounds like he's impressed w/ the kid's improvement over last year.

Thinking about Buges role in all this makes me wonder how much the awful tragedy he endured last year impacted his group. I was a bit surprised when he decided to ride through another season...there's little doubt in my mind he wants to take his guys to the next level and reestablish the o-line as a team strength rather than a weakness.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=53Fan;572902]Things could be worse. The Iggles line sounds like it's falling apart. There's a good article by Larry Weisman on The Redskins Official Site about the problems the Iggles are having.[/quote]

Sure they could always be worse, flip the coin they could and should be much better. It would be foolish to think this front five will and/or does not have areas of real concern. Even this early on.

I wish I had a little more faith in this aging O-line and the depth we have, but I don't. I would hope the Skins at least address the RT position for the short term now and sign a FA, starter quality Tackle.

Could care less about the eagles. I'm not a fan, hope they fall apart.

My only focus is what is going on with the Skins.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=GTripp0012;572912]Two consecutive years now, Heyer's been an above average RT. I think we forget that because last year he was so ungodly disasterous on the left side, that we judged his abilities early. But the biggest problem is that he just looked like a RT on the left side. His footwork was terrible. He's never had that problem on the right side.

Of course, the interior line is the cause of concern. There's Thomas, and who knows what we can get out of him the rest of his career. There's Rabach, and we know perfectly well what we're getting out of him the rest of his career. And Dockery, well, the last time he was here, Rabach and Thomas were quality offensive lineman. He's still the best out of the three, but best case scenario, we get our money's worth when he does an adequate job filling into Pete Kendall's shoes.

Outside of a nice half season from Fabini in 2007, and a good game or two from Mike Pucillo and Rabach here and there, the last time we had a decent C or RG was 2006. Tackle might be the least of the lines concerns, especially since Samuels seems to be back in top form.[/quote]

Well there again GT doesn't it count for something how much positive news we're hearing about Rinehart, the fact we've got a seasoned vet in Bridges (probably a better RG than RT) and a guy who adds about 30 more pounds to the line in big Dock (over Pete)? There's not much defense for Rabach, but what I'm saying is it seems almost certain he'll be sandwiched between better guards than we had last year.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=skinsfan_nn;572934]Sure they could always be worse, flip the coin they could and should be much better. It would be foolish to think this front five will and/or does not have areas of real concern. Even this early on.

I wish I had a little more faith in this aging O-line and the depth we have, but I don't. I would hope the Skins at least address the RT position for the short term now and sign a FA, starter quality Tackle.

Could care less about the eagles. I'm not a fan, hope they fall apart.

My only focus is what is going on with the Skins.[/quote]

I would definitely like to see improvement, but the point is, these are minor injuries we're going through.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;572908]I believe Haynesworth is likely making the offensive line look worse than it will be against most of our opponents, but I hear you.[/quote]

Then I can only imagine how bad the Giants D Line will make them look at the opener. Tuck, Osi, Kiwanuka, Cofield, Robbins, Canty, must have woodies thinking about tee-ing off on Campbell. Even this rookie pass rush specialist OLB, Clint Sintim is probably aroused.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572946]Then I can only imagine how bad the Giants D Line will make them look at the opener. Tuck, Osi, Kiwanuka, Cofield, Robbins, Canty, must have woodies thinking about tee-ing off on Campbell. Even this rookie pass rush specialist OLB, Clint Sintim is probably aroused.[/quote]

Leave it to a Gnats fan to talk about woodies and men getting aroused.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=53Fan;572947]Leave it to a Gnats fan to talk about woodies and men getting aroused.[/quote]

:lol:

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572946]Then I can only imagine how bad the Giants D Line will make them look at the opener. Tuck, Osi, Kiwanuka, Cofield, Robbins, Canty, must have woodies thinking about tee-ing off on Campbell. Even this rookie pass rush specialist OLB, Clint Sintim is probably aroused.[/quote]
This is no slam on your line, it's damn good, but any one of those guys is not AH, and as for Sintim, he's just happy to be invited to the big boy party. The surprise this time might be more for Eli, when AH, Carter, Daniels and Orakpo greet Eli the first time. One hundred million dollar qb vs one hundred million dollar dt, lets see how the day goes HEH HEH HEH.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=53Fan;572947]Leave it to a Gnats fan to talk about woodies and men getting aroused.[/quote]Oh, you really got me there, HAR HAR HAR.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;572951]This is no slam on your line, it's damn good, but any one of those guys is not AH, and as for Sintim, he's just happy to be invited to the big boy party. The surprise this time might be more for Eli, when AH, Carter, Daniels and Orakpo greet Eli the first time. One hundred million dollar qb vs one hundred million dollar dt, lets see how the day goes HEH HEH HEH.[/quote]
You were the kid who even after you got burned kept touching the stove, weren't you? How many times have the Skins brought in these big name FA's only to disappoint? Tuck and Umenyiora are both among the top 5 D-linemen in the league. Not expecting much from Sintim, but the Giants will find a way to work him in and be productive. Not saying he is going to be ROY or even an every down player, but he'll contribute.

Secondly, the Giants have the best OLine coach in the game. He'll have a plan to contain Haynesworth if porkchops is at 100%. Good luck containing the Giants D Line.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572958]You were the kid who even after you got burned kept touching the stove, weren't you? How many times have the Skins brought in these big name FA's only to disappoint? Tuck and Umenyiora are both among the top 5 D-linemen in the league. Not expecting much from Sintim, but the Giants will find a way to work him in and be productive. Not saying he is going to be ROY or even an every down player, but he'll contribute.

Secondly, the Giants have the best OLine coach in the game. He'll have a plan to contain Haynesworth if porkchops is at 100%. Good luck containing the Giants D Line.[/quote]

You are in fantasy land. Strahan and Burress are gone and so is any chance of you guys winning a Super Bowl this year.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572958][B]You were the kid who even after you got burned kept touching the stove, weren't you?[/B] How many times have the Skins brought in these big name FA's only to disappoint? Tuck and Umenyiora are both among the top 5 D-linemen in the league. Not expecting much from Sintim, but the Giants will find a way to work him in and be productive. Not saying he is going to be ROY or even an every down player, but he'll contribute.

Secondly, the Giants have the best OLine coach in the game. He'll have a plan to contain Haynesworth if porkchops is at 100%. Good luck containing the Giants D Line.[/quote]
Actually I learned how to cook an outstanding Lasagna. Bring up past mistakes, I will talk about Fletcher, and the other FAs who made up the #4 d with a lesser line. When AH brings it, you go ahead and think about Stubblefield. I will be looking at DHall taking that pick back to the endzone. I am confident that will happen at least once.
Note, Buges is a pretty dang good coach, and I didn't disrespect your line, but if you want to think that AH, Griff, Daniels, and Carter are not gonna cause a problem, then I'm not the only one drinking koolaid.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

They didn't have Strahan last year and they still had a great D. Nor did they have Umenyiora. This year, Umenyiora is back and they still have everyone from last season's D.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572968]They didn't have Strahan last year and they still had a great D. Nor did they have Umenyiora. This year, Umenyiora is back and they still have everyone from last season's D.[/quote]

Again using that same logic, we didn't have AH last year nor did we have Orakpo. This year AH is here and we still have everyone from last year.

BUT here is the difference, your weaknesses, by your own admission stayed, ("Everyone from last season's D") but our additions strengthened the weak part of our D. Scoff if you want Coff, but the first game will be far different this year.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572958]How many times have the Skins brought in these big name FA's only to disappoint?[/quote]

Still harkening back to 2000? We've also brought in guys like Santana Moss, Clinton Portis, Randy Thomas, Andre Carter, Cornelius Griffin, Andre Carter, Phillip Daniels, London Fletcher, Marcus Washington, and others who have earned their paychecks and, in many cases, exceeded expectations. Oh, and we didn't pay $100,000,000.00 to a QB with a career rating of 76.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;572973]Still harkening back to 2000? We've also brought in guys like Santana Moss, Clinton Portis, Randy Thomas, Andre Carter, Cornelius Griffin, Andre Carter, Phillip Daniels, London Fletcher, Marcus Washington, and others who have earned their paychecks and, in many cases, exceeded expectations.[B] Oh, and we didn't pay $100,000,000.00 to a QB with a career rating of 76[/B].[/quote]

:laughing2 Stupid is as stupid does. :doh:

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572958]You were the kid who even after you got burned kept touching the stove, weren't you? How many times have the Skins brought in these big name FA's only to disappoint? Tuck and Umenyiora are both among the top 5 D-linemen in the league. Not expecting much from Sintim, but the Giants will find a way to work him in and be productive. Not saying he is going to be ROY or even an every down player, but he'll contribute.

Secondly, the Giants have the best OLine coach in the game. He'll have a plan to contain Haynesworth if porkchops is at 100%. Good luck containing the Giants D Line.[/quote]

I'm going to give you a very unbiased opinion (which I don't expect you to have nor a lot of us here, since this is a Redskins fan forum)...

Both the Redskins and the Giants have strong defenses, and both are going to wreak havoc against each other's offense.

I'm speculating here, but, I would say that the Giants and Redskins had somewhat similar fates last season. The Giants offense had a great first half of the season (with Burress), but fizzled out late late in the second half of the season. Of course, their offense was better, because it complimented their great defense and got them to the playoffs. But the G-Men did miss Burress during the loosing streak and ended up being one and done in the playoffs.

We all know the story of the Redskins offense last season, and unfortunately our offense did not compliment our good defense enough to get us to the playoffs or give us a winning season.

Both the Giants and Redskins had similar offseasons. The Giants are still without a #1 receiver and it would have made a lot of sense to trade for Boldin or Edwards (I mean the team has a history of succeeding with a FA WR after all). Instead, the Giants put all their resources on their already strong defense, while losing their #1 WR, a good #2 WR, and a strong component of their running game.

For the Redskins it would have made sense to add a stud lineman with their #1 pick or go after a pro bowl lineman during the offseason. Instead they used their resources to add to their already strong offense (just like the Giants). However, if you do an unbiased comparison in the player loses/acquisitions between both team, I would have to give a nudge to the Redskins.

Redskins offense added Dockery and brought younger depth to their o-line; their defense brought a Pro Bowler DT, a young stud DE/LB, and kept a possibly Pro Bowl CB. However, the Redskins losses were not that great, and most of the people that were released were old players

The Giants did add Nicks at wideout, but he joins a young/inexperience WR group. On defense they added Canty, Bernard, and Boley, but I don't think these guys compare to Haynesworth and Hall, or even Orakpo (if he lives to his potential). New York losses were big, no Burress, no Ward, and no Toomer.

Now, are the Redskins better than the Giants or vice versa? It's hard to tell. I would say they are pretty equal, giving a slight nudge to the Giants right now if I want to be unbiased (plus we have to play them in NY once again in week 1). However, I wouldn't say that one is going to kill the other. Each team has question marks (Giants receivers, Redskins offensive line, no Spags in NY, JC's last stand season) that can make them or break them. You might disagree with me b/c your biased, but I would say this is as unbiased of an opinion you are going to get here.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

To answer the question on whether or not the Redskins had a better offseason than the Giants entirely depends on whether you penalize the Redskins for the moves they almost made. Because while the Redskins were being derided for flirting with their non-existant QB problem, the Giants were improving defensively. But the Redskins also improved defensively, and probably as much if not more.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

In my opinion, coggs, the Giants have the best defense in the division followed by the Redskins, Eagles, and then Cowboys.

The only thing that could possibly prevent the Redskins defense from being top five is if they misuse their personnel. Same with the Giants.

I think the Giants have the better offense right now, by virtue of being the top offense last year. But I think the Redskins are bound to make a big jump offensively, and unless the Giants offense stays right where it established itself last year, I think the Redskins might have the better offense.

As for special teams, our punters' nickname is Hunter the Punter. How cool is that?

You have the better power ranking, but we play Detroit and St. Louis while you play Arizona and Minnesota. Could be an interesting finish, given that schedule quirk.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572968]They didn't have Strahan last year and they still had a great D. Nor did they have Umenyiora. This year, Umenyiora is back [B]and they still have everyone from last season's D[/B].[/quote]
i think they are missing one very important part of that defense, Spagnola. who is their new defensive coordinator?

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Ruhskins;572990]I'm going to give you a very unbiased opinion (which I don't expect you to have nor a lot of us here, since this is a Redskins fan forum)...

Both the Redskins and the Giants have strong defenses, and both are going to wreak havoc against each other's offense.

I'm speculating here, but, I would say that the Giants and Redskins had somewhat similar fates last season. The Giants offense had a great first half of the season (with Burress), but fizzled out late late in the second half of the season. Of course, their offense was better, because it complimented their great defense and got them to the playoffs. But the G-Men did miss Burress during the loosing streak and ended up being one and done in the playoffs.

We all know the story of the Redskins offense last season, and unfortunately our offense did not compliment our good defense enough to get us to the playoffs or give us a winning season.

Both the Giants and Redskins had similar offseasons. The Giants are still without a #1 receiver and it would have made a lot of sense to trade for Boldin or Edwards (I mean the team has a history of succeeding with a FA WR after all). Instead, the Giants put all their resources on their already strong defense, while losing their #1 WR, a good #2 WR, and a strong component of their running game.

For the Redskins it would have made sense to add a stud lineman with their #1 pick or go after a pro bowl lineman during the offseason. Instead they used their resources to add to their already strong offense (just like the Giants). However, if you do an unbiased comparison in the player loses/acquisitions between both team, I would have to give a nudge to the Redskins.

Redskins offense added Dockery and brought younger depth to their o-line; their defense brought a Pro Bowler DT, a young stud DE/LB, and kept a possibly Pro Bowl CB. However, the Redskins losses were not that great, and most of the people that were released were old players

The Giants did add Nicks at wideout, but he joins a young/inexperience WR group. On defense they added Canty, Bernard, and Boley, but I don't think these guys compare to Haynesworth and Hall, or even Orakpo (if he lives to his potential). New York losses were big, no Burress, no Ward, and no Toomer.

Now, are the Redskins better than the Giants or vice versa? It's hard to tell. I would say they are pretty equal, giving a slight nudge to the Giants right now if I want to be unbiased (plus we have to play them in NY once again in week 1). However, I wouldn't say that one is going to kill the other. Each team has question marks (Giants receivers, Redskins offensive line, no Spags in NY, JC's last stand season) that can make them or break them. You might disagree with me b/c your biased, but I would say this is as unbiased of an opinion you are going to get here.[/quote]

Now, this is an intelligent and fair assessment. Mattyk, this site could use an "honors forum" where people such as myself, Ruskins, dmek, and the other intelligent people can hang out to discuss football. Anyways, I wanted them to go after Edwards or Boldin, as well. Even with Edwards dropped balls, a DC still has to account for him and respect him lilke they did for Burress. Opens up the rest of the offense. However, the Giants believe Hixon and Smith are ready to take over. Boldin, I don't think Arizona really wanted to trade him. I think it was a bunch of posturing and their demands were ridiculous. Similar to the Blue Jays and Roy Halladay. Losing Ward is not going to be as big as it seems. Bradshaw was a huge part of the running game in 2007, but was not used much in the offense in 2008. He'll be able to step in. They also have Danny Ware who would be a #2 on most teams ready to compete for the #3 spot if they decide to go with the 3-headed monster attack.

Last year, it wasn't just the loss of Burress. The DLine was also banged up. In 2007, and the first 10-11 games of 2008 they had a rotation of dlinemen to keep everyone fresh. That is why they added Canty, and Bernard, and with getting Umenyiora back, they are stacked again. A DE rotation of Umenyiora, Tuck, Tollefson, Kiwanuka, Canty and a DT rotation of Canty, Alford, Robbins, Bernard, Tollefson will give opposing OLinemen problems.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=GTripp0012;573013]In my opinion, coggs, the Giants have the best defense in the division followed by the Redskins, Eagles, and then Cowboys.

The only thing that could possibly prevent the Redskins defense from being top five is if they misuse their personnel. Same with the Giants.

I think the Giants have the better offense right now, by virtue of being the top offense last year. But I think the Redskins are bound to make a big jump offensively, and unless the Giants offense stays right where it established itself last year, I think the Redskins might have the better offense.

As for special teams, our punters' nickname is Hunter the Punter. How cool is that?

You have the better power ranking, but we play Detroit and St. Louis while you play Arizona and Minnesota. Could be an interesting finish, given that schedule quirk.[/quote]Giants will kill Arizona, but seem to always lose to Minnesota. Giants punter is still Jeff Feagles, not great with distance, but he'll keep the ball inside the 5.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=dmek25;573049]i think they are missing one very important part of that defense, Spagnola. who is their new defensive coordinator?[/quote]Wasn't happy about losing him. They gave him a lot of money last year to stay, but I guess these guys want to be head coaches. I have a feeling he is going to be another in the long list of coaches who were great coordinators, but not so great as a head coach. Time will tell. New DC is Bill Sheridan, was the LB coach the past few years. If I had the choice, would have promoted Waufle, the DLine coach.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

coggs, what makes you think he wont make it as a head coach?

Re: Heyer Injured
 

nothing concrete, just always had the impression that he was a bit of jack-off.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;573055]Mattyk, this site could use an "honors forum" where people such as myself, Ruskins, dmek, and the other intelligent people can hang out to discuss football. [/quote]

I have to give credit where credit is due.

This is the jerk-off post of the week and it's only Thursday. Well done!

It's just fascinating to read that a Giants fan regards themselves with such a great sense of self-worth. You are so very intelligent.

When you look in the mirror does your head look abnormally large?

I'm not talking about how big it looks when you are wearing that Giants helmet that you have under your bed.

You know the one that you bought just to feel the sensation of actually putting a football helmet on for the first time in your life.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=wilsowilso;573124]I have to give credit where credit is due.

This is the jerk-off post of the week and it's only Thursday. Well done!

It's just fascinating to read that a Giant's fan regards themselves with such a great sense of self-worth. You are so very intelligent.

When you look in the mirror does your head look abnormally large?

I'm not talking about how big it looks when you are wearing that Giants helmet that you have under your bed.

You know the one that you bought just to feel the sensation of actually putting a football helmet on for the first time in your life.[/quote]

He said this about an x coach it seems it also applies to their fans:

"nothing concrete, just always had the impression that he was a bit of jack-off."

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=wilsowilso;573124]I have to give credit where credit is due.

This is the jerk-off post of the week and it's only Thursday. Well done!

It's just fascinating to read that a Giants fan regards themselves with such a great sense of self-worth. You are so very intelligent.

When you look in the mirror does your head look abnormally large?

I'm not talking about how big it looks when you are wearing that Giants helmet that you have under your bed.

You know the one that you bought just to feel the sensation of actually putting a football helmet on for the first time in your life.[/quote]

Seriously. I feel badly for anyone who spends their time on an opposing team's site tirelessly defending their team/players to a mass of fans who can't stand them. Talk about running up hill on a treadmill. I wouldn't be caught dead on a Cowboys/Giants/Eagles board trying to convince a bunch of people who hate the Redskins that our players are good. Talk about wasted energy.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=coggs;572946]Then I can only imagine how bad the Giants D Line will make them look at the opener. Tuck, Osi, Kiwanuka, Cofield, Robbins, Canty, must have woodies thinking about tee-ing off on Campbell. Even this rookie pass rush specialist OLB, Clint Sintim is probably aroused.[/quote]

Nice gay references. Not surprising from a fan of the New Jersey team.


Our DL will destroy your OL too. Our secondary is stronger. We have more weapons on offense. Will be a good game, not the homo-erotic blowout you're dreaming about.

Oh yeah... [IMG]http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k56/chad212_2006/6kydw93.gif[/IMG]

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[quote=Buster;573154]Nice gay references. Not surprising from a fan of the New Jersey team.


Our DL will destroy your OL too. Our secondary is stronger. We have more weapons on offense. Will be a good game, not the homo-erotic blowout you're dreaming about.[/quote]

They are all lost now that Strahan is gone.

Re: Heyer Injured
 

[QUOTE=Buster;573154]Nice gay references. Not surprising from a fan of the New Jersey team.


[B]Our DL will destroy your OL too. Our secondary is stronger. We have more weapons on offense. Will be a good game, not the homo-erotic blowout you're dreaming about.[/[/B]QUOTE]

Ha-ha. Nice Buster!