Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

why can't we be frieeeeeeeeeeeends, why cant we be frieeends

Re: Redskins
 

[quote=SirClintonPortis;746496]And recent Super Bowl teams usually dominate in at least one facet of the game, those facets being offense or defense, for the whole year. We're barely keeping afloat everywhere.

[/quote]

This right here is the reason I can't get to hyped over our 3-2 start. Thats why I need to see better football execution before I can even consider us a POSSIBLE playoff team.

Re: Redskins
 

[quote=LavaRnChad;746702]This right here is the reason I can't get to hyped over our 3-2 start. Thats why I need to see better football execution before I can even consider us a POSSIBLE playoff team.[/quote]

everyone is a 'possible' playoff team.

Re: Redskins
 

[quote=Hog1;746502]You mean like Dallas??
How does "SirTonyRomo" sound to you?[/quote]

I hate them as much as anybody here, but for Romo to come into the NFL as a very low round draft pick and become one of the top 7-10 QBs, arguably the best in the NFCE, I'll take him.

Re: Redskins
 

[quote=LavaRnChad;746709]I hate them as much as anybody here, but for [B]Romo[/B] to come into the NFL as a very low round draft pick and become [B]one of the top 7-10 QBs, arguably the best in the NF[/B]CE, I'll take him.[/quote]
AGREED, a phenom in his own right and a...steal!!
If he was getting better protection, they would be dangerous

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

What the hell? Look at this disrespect I spotted on ESPN's fantasy player pages this morning:

[IMG]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5188/espn.png[/IMG]

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

[quote=Buster;746892]What the hell? Look at this disrespect I spotted on ESPN's fantasy player pages this morning:

[IMG]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5188/espn.png[/IMG][/quote]

Heads are rolling (to be clear though this is Rotowire.com)

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

Yep, but it's on ESPN's page, so in the end, it's their responsibility.


Make heads roll, SS. Get rid of Cowturd first.

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

[quote=Buster;746916]Yep, but it's on ESPN's page, so in the end, it's their responsibility.


Make heads roll, SS. Get rid of Cowturd first.[/quote]

It is (was) on Yahoo! Sports, among others, as well. Rotowire provides the content to multiple sites. These things slip by sometimes

I like Cowherd. Didn't until I met him, but now he's probably my favorite personality here (or one of them at least)

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

He could be a cool guy to hang out with and get some wings...but on the air, I can't stand him. His voice, his views, his ego/personality and most of all...anything he says. Even if there's a promo/commercial with his voice on, I change the station until it is over. He's like ESPN's radio version of Stuart Scott. :D

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

[quote=Buster;746929]He could be a cool guy to hang out with and get some wings...but on the air, I can't stand him. His voice, his views, his ego/personality and most of all...anything he says. Even if there's a promo/commercial with his voice on, I change the station until it is over. He's like ESPN's radio version of Stuart Scott. :D[/quote]

He can sound a bit grating sure...but he did pick the Skins over the Packers and has called Shanahan an early favorite of his for coach of the year. The wings here aren't so great...the sushi on the other hand...

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

Cowturd has grown on me over the years. He's entertaining, and that's his job. But man, the guy wasn't made for TV that's for sure.

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

Best: That anthony armstrong catch. reminded me of the a johnson catch in that when armstrong went up and got 2 hands on the ball, the defender actually had his arm/hand in between armstrong's hands holding ball and armstrong's chest making hard for armstrong to just bring the ball in, somehow armstrong managed to maintain control of the ball as he fell. just a super game changing play in a game were we didnt have many on offense.

Also hunter smith gets a big 2 thumbs up. those punts at the 10 really put GB back and imo made GB have to change the way they called plays when backed up. winning the field position battle, not punting it for a touch back, are big big plays in close hard fought games like these.

Good: while i thought the refs just refused to call any holding in this game, i liked how the refs let the players play aggressive. i dont mind refs calling a close game or letting them play, but they must be consistent for both teams and through out the game. yeah that was PI when the guy bumped cooley early but that was the way they were letting them play for both teams. i think the non PI call on jarmon at the very end was also a should have been penalty in alot of other games but in this one it was a consistent non-call.

Worst: lichensteiger, torrain to a degree on pass pro and mcnabb who had his first really ugly inaccurate game which we expected but he also stuck it out and made plays at the end to win the game, which we expected as well.
gano, im alil worried, he seems mentally fragile and inconsistent up to now but Ill take him over what we had in the past.

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

[quote=SmootSmack;746927]It is (was) on Yahoo! Sports, among others, as well. Rotowire provides the content to multiple sites. These things slip by sometimes

I like Cowherd. Didn't until I met him, but now he's probably my favorite personality here (or one of them at least)[/quote]

Looks like it was taken down.

Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst
 

Success! :D