Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst

MTK · 10-11-2010, 11:03 AM

D.C. Sports Bog - Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst

Totally agree with this one:

Worst TV Graphic: For the 703rd consecutive week, the crew broadcasting the Redskins' game -- in this case, on Fox -- used a nifty graphic to show all the coaches who have worked under Dan Snyder, and their personal win-loss records. I mean, I've beaten that drum as much as anyone, but at this point I'd rather see a graphic highlighting the career catches of Anthony Armstrong or something.

Seriously, must they roll that out every damn game??

TheMalcolmConnection · 10-11-2010, 11:15 AM

It's kind of like talking about the 2000 FA spree STILL...

People still talking about that a decade later...

12thMan · 10-11-2010, 11:18 AM

I was stunned they rolled out that stat with all the flash and dazzling effects. I was like WTF does this have to do with the Skins being 2-2, facing the Packers today.

They roll out that tired ass stat every chance they get. I'm like move on already.

saden1 · 10-11-2010, 11:18 AM

NBC is having a similar graphic being prepared as we speak.

NYCskinfan82 · 10-11-2010, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

NBC is having a similar graphic being prepared as we speak.

NO NO NO remember the networks talk now so Fox will be loaning there graphic to NBC. LOL

saden1 · 10-11-2010, 11:25 AM

I Brian Orakpo really 24? Even his voice is scary...all I hear when is speaks is "I'ma kill you!"

GhettoDogAllStars · 10-11-2010, 11:42 AM

We are the media's whipping boy, plain and simple. They love to hate us, and the other teams in the division easily get more, and better, coverage.

Has anyone been hearing how the Giants are #1 in the division? I've heard it several times now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are 2nd (div record 0-0) and we are 1st (div record 2-0). If anything, they are merely tied for 1st.

TheMalcolmConnection · 10-11-2010, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars

We are the media's whipping boy, plain and simple. They love to hate us, and the other teams in the division easily get more, and better, coverage.

Has anyone been hearing how the Giants are #1 in the division? I've heard it several times now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are 2nd (div record 0-0) and we are 1st (div record 2-0). If anything, they are merely tied for 1st.

I gotta' say though. Nicks has been scary for them. I HATED when they got him in the draft (later than I would have guessed too). That being said, we've proven we can play with ANYONE.

artmonkforhallofamein07 · 10-11-2010, 11:52 AM

Best: The Offense and Defense in the 4th Quarter and Overtime.

Worst: The Offense and Defense in the first half!

Stat that matters: Win. 3-2 1st in the East one game out of Homefield Advantage in the Playoffs!

(had to add that one)

GhettoDogAllStars · 10-11-2010, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I gotta' say though. Nicks has been scary for them. I HATED when they got him in the draft (later than I would have guessed too). That being said, we've proven we can play with ANYONE.

Yeah, Nicks is totally legit, and the worst part is that he makes Eli look good. So now that makes us the only team in the division without a big play receiver, unless you consider Moss, but he doesn't really compare to Austin, Jackson and Nicks.

scowan · 10-11-2010, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars

Yeah, Nicks is totally legit, and the worst part is that he makes Eli look good. So now that makes us the only team in the division without a big play receiver, unless you consider Moss, but he doesn't really compare to Austin, Jackson and Nicks.

Yeah, but I thought Jennings and Driver were suppose to be "all that" ..... let's see Jennings 2-22 and Driver 4-58 and neither scored, so all I have to say is "whatever" to these great receivers. The Skins also shut down Jackson and Maclin the week before. Teams are obviously moving the ball on the skins, but they havn't scored much on them lately. I see the skins doing the same thing to Manning next week. The Colts seem to be stuggling lately to score as it is.

GTripp0012 · 10-11-2010, 12:46 PM

The Giants and the Eagles both look good. Eagles look like the best team, but we usually match up with them a lot better than we do the Giants. We may have to beat the Eagles twice to finish ahead of them. The Giants, we can probably get away with a split because of our softer non-conference schedule.

Then again, we lost to the Rams who might be better than the Seahawks, and the Bucs are almost certainly a better opponent than the Panthers. So perhaps the Giants have the easiest schedule in the division, considering that Tampa Bay looks like a .500 or better team.

GTripp0012 · 10-11-2010, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scowan

Yeah, but I thought Jennings and Driver were suppose to be "all that" ..... let's see Jennings 2-22 and Driver 4-58 and neither scored, so all I have to say is "whatever" to these great receivers. The Skins also shut down Jackson and Maclin the week before. Teams are obviously moving the ball on the skins, but they havn't scored much on them lately. I see the skins doing the same thing to Manning next week. The Colts seem to be stuggling lately to score as it is.

Rogers took Jennings out of the game -- they love to use him out of the slot and we just took him off the field essentially.

Driver had a number of plays where he beat our coverage downfield and then just dropped the pass.

redsk1 · 10-11-2010, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

It's kind of like talking about the 2000 FA spree STILL...

People still talking about that a decade later...

Yes, I don't like it either, but it has been the Skins "way" for about a decade up until last year w/ the AH signing. Big FA signings, no draft.

CRedskinsRule · 10-11-2010, 12:52 PM

Week 5: Redskins Defeat Packers In Overtime: 16-13

good pictures

10-11-2010, 11:15 AM	#2
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst It's kind of like talking about the 2000 FA spree STILL... People still talking about that a decade later... __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

10-11-2010, 11:18 AM	#3
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst I was stunned they rolled out that stat with all the flash and dazzling effects. I was like WTF does this have to do with the Skins being 2-2, facing the Packers today. They roll out that tired ass stat every chance they get. I'm like move on already.

10-11-2010, 11:18 AM	#4
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst NBC is having a similar graphic being prepared as we speak. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

10-11-2010, 11:25 AM	#6
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst I Brian Orakpo really 24? Even his voice is scary...all I hear when is speaks is "I'ma kill you!" __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

10-11-2010, 11:42 AM	#7
GhettoDogAllStars Playmaker Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Denver Age: 42 Posts: 2,762	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst We are the media's whipping boy, plain and simple. They love to hate us, and the other teams in the division easily get more, and better, coverage. Has anyone been hearing how the Giants are #1 in the division? I've heard it several times now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are 2nd (div record 0-0) and we are 1st (div record 2-0). If anything, they are merely tied for 1st. __________________ To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered.

10-11-2010, 11:03 AM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst D.C. Sports Bog - Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst Totally agree with this one: Worst TV Graphic: For the 703rd consecutive week, the crew broadcasting the Redskins' game -- in this case, on Fox -- used a nifty graphic to show all the coaches who have worked under Dan Snyder, and their personal win-loss records. I mean, I've beaten that drum as much as anyone, but at this point I'd rather see a graphic highlighting the career catches of Anthony Armstrong or something. Seriously, must they roll that out every damn game?? __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

10-11-2010, 11:52 AM	#9
artmonkforhallofamein07 Pro Bowl Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Charleston , SC Posts: 5,001	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst Best: The Offense and Defense in the 4th Quarter and Overtime. Worst: The Offense and Defense in the first half! Stat that matters: Win. 3-2 1st in the East one game out of Homefield Advantage in the Playoffs! (had to add that one) __________________ Just win.

10-11-2010, 12:46 PM	#12
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 36 Posts: 15,994	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst The Giants and the Eagles both look good. Eagles look like the best team, but we usually match up with them a lot better than we do the Giants. We may have to beat the Eagles twice to finish ahead of them. The Giants, we can probably get away with a split because of our softer non-conference schedule. Then again, we lost to the Rams who might be better than the Seahawks, and the Bucs are almost certainly a better opponent than the Panthers. So perhaps the Giants have the easiest schedule in the division, considering that Tampa Bay looks like a .500 or better team. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

10-11-2010, 12:52 PM	#15
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 57 Posts: 21,429	Re: Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst Week 5: Redskins Defeat Packers In Overtime: 16-13 good pictures

Redskins-Packers, Best and Worst

Locker Room Main Forum