Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=Alvin Walton;1165573][url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/21/report-bears-seeking-trade-partner-for-cutler/]Report: Bears seeking trade partner for Cutler | ProFootballTalk[/url]

stay away
stay away[/quote]

Hahaha! The media has been trying to get Cutler to Washington for years now.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=Alvin Walton;1165573][URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/02/21/report-bears-seeking-trade-partner-for-cutler/"]Report: Bears seeking trade partner for Cutler | ProFootballTalk[/URL]

stay away
stay away[/quote]

Sure, now that Cutler is old and washed up instead of young and slightly above average, it makes perfect sense that we'd be interested in him now. Maybe we can trade Kirk and a first for him.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

If we let Kirk go and don't get a QB like Romo, fuck it might as well get cutler.. He's better than colt right?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1165608]If we let Kirk go and don't get a QB like Romo, fuck it might as well get cutler.. He's better than colt right?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]

Cutler? Romo? They would be stop gap moves regardless. The big noise at this moment is Winston seems to want Desean in Tampa Bay There is a good chance we lose both Desean and Pierre this off season. If that is the case two picks will be for WR I think, unless we get a cheap FA wide out. 2017 might end up being a whack year for the Skins.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1165608]If we let Kirk go and don't get a QB like Romo, fuck it might as well get cutler.. He's better than colt right?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]

No, he isnt

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1165611]No, he isnt[/quote]

They both suck, Cutler may retire according to reports. If we don't have Kirk in 2017, we will have a LONG YR bro.. It could be another 4-12 season

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=FlyerSkin;1165609]Cutler? Romo? They would be stop gap moves regardless. The big noise at this moment is Winston seems to want Desean in Tampa Bay There is a good chance we lose both Desean and Pierre this off season. If that is the case two picks will be for WR I think, unless we get a cheap FA wide out. 2017 might end up being a whack year for the Skins.[/quote]

Tony could be a good pick up if he stays upright.. He's better than Colt or a rookie starting.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

I want KC to work out, but...

For some reason I think Colt will be ok. I think that is why it is hard for the front office to swallow the large numbers for KC - they believe that Colt will work.

So following this train of thought... maybe QB isnt a free agent need most think it is. That gives even more inherent value to trading KC - none of the picks have to back fill QB.

Not what I want to see, but is a legit thought process IF Colt can play.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

Colt McCoy is one concussion from retiring. He cannot make it through a full year healthy. This is stupid that we are even talking about something this dumb. McCoy can be a back up for a game but over the course of a year? He will suck badly.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;1165667]Colt McCoy is one concussion from retiring. He cannot make it through a full year healthy. This is stupid that we are even talking about something this dumb. McCoy can be a back up for a game but over the course of a year? He will suck badly.[/quote]

I agree.If Colt could stay healthy I think he would be ok,but I dont think he can.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

Colt cannot make the deep throws Cousins can, but if we lose both our starting recievers as well I guess it doesnt really matter. F this team and this bullshit.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

I don't even want to have the "potential replacements for KC" discussion, so I won't. If the plan is to let Kirk go and potentially have Colt start the entire year, I won't root for a team this year, I'll just watch the games and hope they're entertaining.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1165681]I don't even want to have the "potential replacements for KC" discussion, so I won't. If the plan is to let Kirk go and potentially have Colt start the entire year, I won't root for a team this year, I'll just watch the games and hope they're entertaining.[/QUOTE]



I will root for a 2 win season so Dan and Bruce get exposed for the shit brains they are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[quote=Brody81;1165682]I will root for a 2 win season so Dan and Bruce get exposed for the shit brains they are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

We've had that - or close enough. It's all inconceivable.

Re: NFL offseason 1.0 thread
 

[url=http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/dallas-cowboys/cowboys/2017/02/23/tony-romo-play-washington-2017-cowboys-redskins-need]Dallas Cowboys: Could Tony Romo play for Washington in 2017? Here's what Cowboys, Redskins would need to do | SportsDay[/url]