![]() |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[quote=DynamiteRave;1172541]Any reason why starters are playing the first half? Other than they've been terrible and really needs the reps?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] They've been terrible and really need the reps. No run game at all. |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[QUOTE=jamf;1172542]They've been terrible and really need the reps.
No run game at all.[/QUOTE]That scares me. When we have to throw 40 times a game we won't be better than last year. 9-7 at best if the run game isn't improved Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
What bothers me about the OL is that we have seen them run block better with a worse personnel
|
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
Total 10 yards rushing the first half.
|
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;1172544]What bothers me about the OL is that we have seen them run block better with a worse personnel[/QUOTE]Yeah I hope it'll get better.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
We are still not going to be able to run the ball. It's not what we do well. If you don't have TE's that can block you won't run. Period. Reed and Paul are not blockers and Davis is meh..
|
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
2nd String looks pretty good.
I'm glad Doctson is getting playing time. Fuller does not look like a returner. |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[quote=jamf;1172551]2nd String looks pretty good.
I'm glad Doctson is getting playing time. Fuller does not look like a returner.[/quote] Seriously...get fuller off the field before he blows out a knee. Wtf |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
Well Kirk did great and played indeed. He got a TD!
|
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
At least we are winning
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[quote=DynamiteRave;1172541]Any reason why starters are playing the first half? Other than they've been terrible and really needs the reps?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] You answered your own question. Plus it looks like the entire offense will rely on Kirk and his receivers in a repeat of last season. Maybe our vaunted O line isn't as good as advertised. Fat Rob is a dud in PS thus far. Perrine shows a tad of promise. |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
[QUOTE=FlyerSkin;1172555]You answered your own question. Plus it looks like the entire offense will rely on Kirk and his receivers in a repeat of last season. Maybe our vaunted O line isn't as good as advertised. Fat Rob is a dud in PS thus far. Perrine shows a tad of promise.[/QUOTE]Kirk is a top 10 fantasy guy for a reason. Everyone knows we will pass it 40 times a game
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
Only positive on offense from last night was Jay Gruden IMO.
He had the guts to keep his 1st offense out there until they finally produce. He's said to be a players coach, but yesterday he made a statement. And that's risky because if a key player (TW, KC, Pryor or Crowder for say) had been seriously injured he looks like a fool. Also he seemed to have learned a thing or two about clock management. On defense we look good at ILB. |
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
Consistently, the O-line
|
Re: P/S week 2. Packers thread
A big fuck you to the NFL Network. I purposely avoided sports all day and went to bed early so I could wake up early and watch the replay of the game. It was on at 4 am. Didn't record because the network is unavailable. Unbelievable. Good thing i recorded Terrance Crawford fight too so I still have something to watch.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.